Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Doncaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Coredesat 08:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Doncaster

Unmaintained, incomplete portal about a very narrow topic. Eight of the subpages linked on the portal page were never created. (There are three Doncaster articles so it is not speedyable as an underpopulated portal.) The only edit in the last year was to fix a disambiguation link. --B 06:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. feydey 16:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Shalom ^Hello 01:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. It would be better for editors to work on creating Portal:Yorkshire and only add portals for parts of Yorkshire at a later time, when more users are involved. --Bduke 07:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as a small, incomplete, unmaintained portal: just what the nominator said. Acalamari 20:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 17:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.