Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Jim brosnan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Closed for in the wrong process, and page deleted per housekeeping (dab to nonexistent pages) and A7. >Radiant< 14:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jim brosnan

A disambiguation page that is entirely redlinked. Examination of the capsule descriptions suggests that it is very unlikely that either person would pass WP:BIO even if the articles were written. Joyous! | Talk 21:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:BIO, and both subjects are related to each other. --Nishkid64 22:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom (capitalisation is wrong in any case). Yomangani^talk 23:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy close, list on AfD as is usual for pages in article space; this is MfD. --ais523 08:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Good point. Speedy close as listed in wrong place. Yomangani^talk 10:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.