The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEPT, by someone else. -Splashtalk 03:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Rfc's existance is a clear-cut case of WP:POINT. -- that's right i'm anon 18:08, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Speedy keep. This Request for Comment was made in good faith. Andrew pmk | Talk 18:41, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Deletion at this point in this forum would be horribly out-of-process. Xoloz 22:32, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.