User talk:Misza13/Archives/2006

Cold War

Hi, I see that you reverted my edit on Cold War. The reason I removed the text is that it was an unwikified load on top of the current article. Can you take a look at it? Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, mea culpa. I'm recently spending a lot of time on RC patrol, mercilessly hunting massive deletions/blankings - I have mistakenly taken your edit as such. As a side note, why not just leave that text and work on it? --Misza13 ^(Talk) 14:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

I was in "RC Patrol mode", and not in "work on an article to make it better mode" myself as well. Basically, adding the text dump made the article look poor (after all, two different articles on the Cold War on the same page) and I was in no mood to start the delicate work of merging bits and pieces into the former article. Anyway, thanks for helping out on the RC patrol, it is a pretty sweaty work. :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

History should be restored on Social Security page

After the vandalism, the restored version cut out the history, unless of course you want to break that out too into another article. John wesley 18:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

A strage behaviour of the Popups utility, I suppose. I did go back in the diff history to make sure I'm reverting a whole batch of vandalism but the bogon radiation probably messed up something anyway. --Misza13 ^(Talk) 19:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

What's up with those userboxes?

I don't know if anyone will ever come here, but anyway... I'm recently confused and frustrated by all the mess with userboxes. Having logged today I have noticed a userbox on my page (namely {{User no evil boxes}}) changed into a red link. No TfD tag, no discussion, nothing. Apparently it was speedied and I don't even know how to check who did it and who's to blame. While trying to recreate it from scratch I also noticed that {{user freedom}} was also removed. Also, many boxes from Wikipedia:Userboxes/Userboxes#Userbox Opinions and Politics have vanished as well (red links as proof of backlink-careless deletion). I mean, okay after a proper discussion and reached consensus they can be deleted, but those userbox-hating-authoritary-admins make me want to leave this community. What I have even noticed is that in some cases userboxes were deleted despite consensus saying otherwise. Now I know that Wikipedia is not a democracy, but some admins apparently understand it as Wikipedia is adminocracy ruled by Jimbo the King. They seem to freely base their decisions on "Jimbo stated that..." or on various policies (whichever suits them better). Actually the policies are also confusing - at time I remember there were at least 3 different places where userbox policy was extensively discussed - and how is one to catch up with it and defend his point? And all the while the boxes keep dying one after another... Okay, enough with this rant - I don't think anyone cares anyway, but if some experienced and well informed on this matter user could help me in my frustration, I'd be grateful. Misza13 ^(Talk) 12:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

You can check the deletion log ([1]). Just go to Special:Log and select delete. Then search. There is guy going around substituing deleted userboxes onto peoples userpages, so maybe yours will get fixed up that way. And if you do recreate it, keep in mind that you can only do so in your userspace, not in the template namespace.--Commander Keane 12:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Yep - let's move all userboxes to some userspace (or project space), and then let the deletionist fume to their heart extent.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I'm an inclusionist, but thanks for asking. Also, we've been advocating the substing and movement of these things to user space for quite some time now, not that anyone's been listening. Mackensen (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Well, we're listening now. Your disruption has made your point, hey, wait, isn't that against guidelines? Hmm, let's see, yep, right here at WP:POINT. So why don't you undelete them, put messages on the templates to show that they need to be subseted in X hours and give people a chance to do so? The Ungovernable Force 05:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. [2] —Guanaco 19:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

insurgent box.

{{User:Mike McGregor/insurgent}} I backed it up when I made it.

Thanks

Thanks for signing my manifesto and taking an active role in combating the speedy deletion of userboxes. Also, I like your userbox, but it took me a long time to get my userpage looking spiffy and formatted well, so I don't want to add more userboxes. The Ungovernable Force 08:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Rfc

Misza, I've started an Rfc regarding this weekend. If there's anything you can add, please do so. --D-Day Somebody talk to me. Please somebody! Anybody! 23:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying. I was recently thinking about doing it myself. I promise I'll try to find some time to improve the quality of the RfC (as I see Kelly Martin is already questioning it). Oh, and spread the gospel that userboxes are not harmful to the Wiki community! Misza13 ^(Talk) 23:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

It will be done. Thanks! --D-Day Somebody talk to me. Please somebody! Anybody! 23:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment on DRV/Userboxes

I was just trying to prevent the place from getting absolutely swamped. But I guess that's going to happen anyway. --Cyde Weys 23:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

deleted templates

I'm sorry to have forgotton the <noinclude> tags on these userboxes. However users could easily have removed the templates from their userpages to avoid the mistake: that is, if any users were actually using these userboxes (which they weren't at the time of deletion, at least according to "What links here"). To accuse me of vandalism is a serious breach of WP:AGF. Physchim62 (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so no vandalism then. I change the accusation to incompetence and irresponsibility. I am mostly annoyed by this because it is not the first such case when an admin is so hasty in {{deletedpage}}'ing and protecting the 'boxen that they simply don't care. Anyway, thanks for not ingoring me at all like others do. Misza13 ^(Talk) 22:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Howard Bloom

Why did you revert my edits? They were entirely intra-wikipedia links and cleanup efforts. 130.253.5.179 17:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I was on an RC partol scanning for massive page blankings. When I saw this edit I decided that this is such a case. Please register and start using edit summaries - this way your edits won't be suspicious to others. Misza13 ^(Talk) 18:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

oh I just rearranged the page. the two or three paragraphs text I deleted were reincorporated earlier in the article. i'm sorry for th confusion. 130.253.5.179 18:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey

Hey fattie nerd. Get off your fat ass and find something productive to do, rather than reverting edits in what is a very inaccurate piece of shit encylcopedia anyway.

By the way, nice going in WW2. Getting invaded by the Germans and that....you were shit. 172.216.94.217 18:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

If you don't like Wikipedia, you don't have to edit it. Nobody forces you (I hope!) to do it. As of BTW, I wonder where you come from, IP coward? Misza13 ^(Talk) 18:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

The last thing I need is a bunch of sweaty WoW fans appearing on my doorstep. By all means search all of Swindon if you must! 172.216.94.217 18:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the Reversions

Thank you for reverting the vandalism of my user page in such a timely fashion, twice. Hu 19:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. I have non-self edits to users' pages highlighted in Vandal Fighter and am happy to revert such vandalism as well. Misza13 ^(Talk) 19:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

PokeRealm

Hello, are you an admin? If so, can you delete the PokeRealm entry and protect it?

M@thwiz2020 said he would if it was re-posted. O 0 19:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not an admin - I'm just using a JavaScript code that emulates the admin "rollback" action. Are you sure this article doesn't even qualify for cleanup? Misza13 ^(Talk) 19:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Ani maldjian

Hello! I see you have {{copyvio}}'ed Ani maldjian. I'd like you to know that I have also found the article on http://www.armeniapedia.org/index.php?title=Ani_Maldjian, so perhaps this is not a copyvio but a candidate for cleanup? Misza13 ^(Talk) 20:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I did. But that page is a direct mirror of wikipedia and it is a copyvio as well. ---J.Smith 20:13, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you much! :)

I really appreciate you noticing my work. My name is Mike, hope to talk to you again in the future! :)Judgesurreal777 21:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

My name is Michael as well (just in Polish). :-) Again, good work on Pyromania. I had it watched for almost a month by now and I still hardly believe the progress (the amount of work to be done before cleanup was just beyond my comprehension). The history of your edits to the article (step by step) is also a good lesson in performing a cleanup. Thanks! BTW, I really like your user page: I would also like to have such clean and tidy one but I just can't resist to putting every junk I find around in there. ;-) See ya! Misza13 ^(Talk) 22:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Archive

Thanks for archiving my talk page! I'd have done it myself, but there's this thing called school I gotta work on, so this was kind of put on the backburner. Thanks again though! --D-Day ^{My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes} 20:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. After all, what are friends for, right? --Misza13 ^(Talk) 20:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Invitation

I'd like your thoughts on a brainstorm I've tried to articulate here: User:Leifern/Adminwatch idea. And feel free to spread the word. --Leifern 16:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandlism to my user page. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 00:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Polish noticeboard

You may be interested in visiting our Wikipedia:Polish Wikipedians' notice board.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

What if someone crossed out the Polish flag?

Would you find that respectful? ROGNNTUDJUU! 17:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, technically any disagreement could be seen as a lack of respect, but since when a lack thereof is a crime? And crossing something out is a universally understood way of disagreement expression, so it would be fine with me. Leaving that aside, you seem to have abundant amounts of free time. Why don't you use it up on something useful (instead wasting it in pointless debates)? Like writing an encyclopedia? You see, there's still a lot to be done. Misza13 ^{T C E} 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

You know what? Abusing wikispace for divisive user boxes is not in any way helpful for improving an encyclopedia. Same holds for double standards on images. I use mine in a helpful way: {{user respect}} ROGNNTUDJUU! 01:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Your userbox is as divisive at the anti-EU one (so don't be surprised if you wake up one day just to see that it's gone), so please go back to writing encyclopedia and stop wasting my and other people's time with this trolling. Thank you. Misza13 ^{T C E} 12:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Good job

I just wanted to commend you for the way in which you've been handling this situation involving ROGNNTUDJUU!. The two images he has been posting everywhere, the crossed-out US and UK flags, have been nominated for deletion at WP:IFD because of their violation of policy (they were only uploaded to prove a point, as he even admitted to on the images' talk pages). Hopefully ROGNNTUDJUU! will learn what is appropriate in this community and things will cool down. But, until then, keep up the good work, and if you want any support in anything, I'm around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metros232 (talk • contribs)

Question

Do you write the revert messages such as "Reverted edits by 195.195.127.253 to last version by Quiddity" every time manually, or do you use some script or template? Thanks, ---Marcus- 12:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

No, obviously. This would be too tedious. I'm using a JavaScript code which does it automatically. It's called godmode-lite.js (should be somewhere on WP:US) and emulates the "rollback" action normally available only to admins. Misza13 ^{T C} 12:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

User PGP

Thanks for being the first user I noticed to try out my {{User PGP}} box. Kit O'Connell (Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 21:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

And I thank you for creating it. I like to collect such geeky stuff. I don't use PGP a lot (hmmm... do I still remember my passphrase? I keep forgetting it) but it's fun nonetheless. However, I think I'll do some upgrades to the userbox - it could use some face-lifting. Misza13 ^{T C} 22:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

RuneScape

Sorry for accidentally reverting your revert of vandalism on RuneScape...we must have hit revert at the same time and you got to it first. Schzmo 11:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

It's ok. That's what often happens when two people "race for revert" and both are armed only with JavaScript tools (your popups vs my godmode-lite.js) - the long time it takes to revert this way sometimes causes such strange effects. Misza13 ^{T C} 12:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello Misza13

I saw your work it's very nice.I was only experimenting and i wont do it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.190.122 (talk • contribs)

Tawkerbot2

Hmm, I wonder if this was another freak networking error, there filter that it was flagged under a criteria what it wouldn't catch. I'll have a look into it, that one is the one in a thousand bug we've been having. Sorry about that -- Tawker 17:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for providing the link for MarkSweep to ban me. You're not getting anything in my Wikiwill! ;) --D-Day ^{My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes} 18:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, I do my best to show people that the userbox discussions are sometimes ridiculous. I also couldn't resist expressing my personal dislike to MarkSweep. Too bad he's probably too occupied with his ArbCom case to notice. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom eh? Well well. That should be fun. Yeah that Tfd was kind of a parody, although hindsight being what it is, it probably wasn't the best idea. Oh well. --D-Day ^{My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes} 19:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

rv of vandalism

Hi Misza,

Just a quick note to say thank you for reverting the vandalism of my userpage! As funny as that was, I'd probably prefer it not to be there... on balance!

Thanks again, DJR (Talk) 19:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Alien vs. Predator

What's the problem? That article needs MAJOR cleanup work and I'm taking it upon myself to do it. Why would you revert my edits? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.36.17.218 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, actually, from my view you have removed a massive amount of content without specifying an edit summary. This is very confusing for other editors, especially because massive blankings of articles are one os the most frequest forms of vandalism here. You might also considering registering as edits made by anonymous IPs are also more conspicious. Finally, you could use the {{inuse}} template to indicate the fact that you're working on the article. Misza13 ^{T C} 21:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. If need be, use the preview button, but don't slaughter the article while you're in the process of "cleaning it up". Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Maybe this is a matter of me inproperly stating my intentions. I'm all to happy to continue allowing anyone and everyone to make edits to the page, including my work. HOWEVER, much of what's on that page (as is noted on the edit page) is simply speculation inserted based on people's memories of the film. In addition, I don't feel that such an in-depth breakdown of the entire film story - including spoilers - is neccesary for a descriptive page on the film. I honestly feel that my edits make the page cleaner, easier to understand and more direct. I simply don't have enough time to spend several hours fixing everything in one big sitting, if you guys woukld like to add to or modify my edits, please do, but don't simply revert my work. I'm trying to benefit the page, not vandalize it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.36.17.218 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok then. But may I suggest that you:

1. edit the article in small parts,
2. specify proper edit summaries,
3. register,
4. sign your posts with "~~~~"?

Thank you. Misza13 ^{T C} 22:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

No one is questioning your motives here, but the fact does remain that you have already violated WP:3RR and three other editors have found your changes to be unhelpful (and reverted them as such). If you disagree with how the article is written and would like to make major sweeping changes to it, please discuss these changes at Talk:Alien vs. Predator (film) beforehand. There's nothing wrong in being bold with your editing, but disregarding community consensus is disrespectful, and violating the three revert rule is a blockable offense. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough, but: 1. I did put something about my edits on the talk page, and I did add edit captions to a couple of my reversions saying that I was attempting to HELP the article 2. I was unaware if the three revert rule BUT 3. It only came to that because you guys simply panned my edits as vandalism without so much as looking at what I had written. I'm making an effort to ensure that everything of importance that was on tha page before reamins there, I'm simply removing surpurflous information and rewording what's left. As you would have noted if you'd read my changes before you reverted them, the plot synopsis is still there, as are the facts and trivia, etc... The only thing I've really removed is the speculatory and largly inaccurate overly large breakdown of the film's events - it just seems like I removed much more beacuse that section occupied a considerable amount of space. If the consensus is that the play by play breakdown should remain, then let's re-insert it - but let's do it in clear language and without the inaccuracies.

If we're going to continue this discussion, please forward any comments to my talk page. --Flash-Gordon 10:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Persian people

Regarding your edit here. Why are you reverting your own reverts? You also might want to check this guy User:200.118.111.122 who jumped into two unrelated edit wars in a very timely manner. Shoot, you're not an admin!? Aucaman^Talk 14:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually, my first revert was almost automatic after almost reverting him after this (Ahwaz reverted first) - I just went through his contributions. Then I actually found out that he was referring to the talk page ("AS PER Zmmz"), where the dispute indeed seemed to be solved (to me at least), so I undid myself. Sorry for the confusion. Oh, and yes, I'm not an admin. Why? Misza13 ^{T C} 15:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

No the dispute is not over. There's even a mediation case. See this, which has remained unanswered (the personal attack's placed outside the section). They're not supposed to remove the dispute tag, but I'm not going to get into a revert war now. Aucaman^Talk 15:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks Misza for wishing me happy birthday. Szvest 15:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up™}

Redirect

Sorry about that, will do. McPhail 15:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment from User:200.118.111.122

why are you chnaging my edits? i'm editing based on sources, please read before changing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.118.111.122 (talk • contribs)

I don't care about the content which you have added (actually you have removed more than added). It has been reverted and will be reverted until a consensus is reached on the article's talk page. Misza13 ^{T C} 15:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism?????

What are you talking about? I havent vandalised anything. I never edit, and I dont even know how to vandalise. My friend is the only other person that knows my password, he might have done that. I wouldnt ruin people's things, that is mean and it takes away peoples info.

If you could beilieve me please reply.

User:JimmyNikaidoh123

I have replied on your talk page. Misza13 ^{T C} 18:41, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for working on Portal:Culture of Indians. I see this portal will be successful. -User:Code Napoleon

Revert on Cold War

Just FYI, I've reverted your revert on Cold War. The anon User:209.66.200.45 fixed the vandalism; your revert restored the Pig Latin version (done by User:ChaoticAzure). - jredmond 19:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I usually check the diff before reverting but in cases where my Vandal Fighter reports a massive removal of text (this was some 20 KB) I go straight to contributions and revert from there to speed it up. Works most of the time, sometimes fails. ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 19:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiDefcon 1

Hello! FYI, the WikiDefcon 1 is reserved for really extreme cases of vandalism. If you feel that there is some increase of activity (I did a quick check with CDVF and couldn't spot it) it rather qualifies as 4. 3 and 2 are used when Wikipedia is assaulted by massive attack by automated/bot attack (such as SQUIDWARD). Finally, I don't know if level 1 (formerly known as "Overwhelming level of vandalism. Database lock recommended.") was ever legitimately called. Thus, I have reverted it back to 5. Please be careful in judging the situation in future not to cause unnecessary panic. Thank you, Misza13 ^{T C} 13:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

...um... what? What did I do? I presume it was an accident, but I'm not sure what you're talking about. Stifle 13:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I think you got me mixed up with User:Scaife. Stifle 13:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Um, yes... Sorry... Actually, I'm wondering now which links did I follow to make that mistake. ;-p I'll bug him now then. Sorry again. --Misza13 ^{T C} 13:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I know: I mixed you up in history of WP:AIV. He was adding new vandals, you were removing and that's how it went. Misza13 ^{T C} 13:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

*embarrassed* Sorry, we were just getting hammered earlier. I'll leave the shiny things alone in the future. Cheers! --Scaife ^(Talk) Don't forget Hanlon's Razor 13:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, I didn't mean to be that harsh. Perhaps you just need a bit more experience on RC patrol (or see for yourself how an actual SQUIDWARD attack looks like in CDVF). Misza13 ^{T C} 13:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey, no problem. If you didn't tell me how whould I know, right? --Scaife ^(Talk) Don't forget Hanlon's Razor 21:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Warm welcome

I'd just like to thank you for the welcome you gave me, so, thanks :) S-m-r-t 16:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

User: Ad it al

I recently read your comment on Naconkantari's talk page about putting my cousins pleas to him in BJAODN, and I must say I am insulted. I believe, despite his actions, he should be treated fairly, and I believe an informal apology is in order. Trosk 00:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I didn't mean to insult anyone (moreover I don't understand why you feel insulted). If I did somehow, then sorry, but I found the discussion just plain hilarious. I think you should give your cousin a small lecture on "Introdution to Internet Usage" - your computer may be in danger in his incompetent hands. Cheers! Misza13 ^{T C} 10:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Mini Thanks!

Congratulations on your victory in the war against vandalism on Mini today. Many thanks! SteveBaker 14:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

User trolling

Hey Misza13, a couple of weeks back, you had some dealings with ROGNNTUDJUU!. At the time you warned him that his actions were borderline trolling and spamming. Well, the user is back and doing much of the same things. He deleted the comment you left on his user page: [3]. The user continues to delete comments off the talk pages at his own whim and reply to them on other talk pages if he feels like it. What kind of action do you advise from here?--Metros232 23:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Damn, I though this troll has given up already. As per the usual policy against trolls, I'd say ignore and just vote delete on his creations (if you care at all!). On the other hand, I'm tempted to fill an RfC on this, but then again: an RfC's purpose is to arrive at a consensus (no formal decisions are made) and I don't think ROGNNTUDJUU! is up for any consensus... I'll give a last try and direct him to Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. --Misza13 ^{T C} 10:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Really, I thought he had just left the project all together too. But yes, RfC had crossed my mind too, but I agree, I don't know how willing he would be to cooperate in such an action. If you start one, however, I'll support it of course.--Metros232 12:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Le sigh. Your posts to him were removed this morning with the edit summary: "This has been dealt with already and posting it here again is vandalism". So, congrats, you're now a vandal. How does it feel? Oy vey.--Metros232 15:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

User:82.15.17.152

Thanks for reverting my talk page, and for reporting this one to WP:AIV. Much appreciate. Gwernol 15:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Bouncing Souls move

Thanks for the help with the Bouncing Souls move. bmearns, KSC_(talk) 22:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandal on my user page [4]. --Ugur Basak 23:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

CSD

Your personal monobook is appearing in CAT:CSD. Your edit summaries do not appear that you really want this deleted. If you do please make an edit to it, specificy PLEASE DELETE, or leave me a talk message. If you do not want this deleted, please examine it for why it may be getting categorzied for deletion. Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaosflux (talk • contribs) 04:34, March 19, 2006

I think it's because this line contains the deletion template, I have temporarily removed it:

addlilink(Amenu,'javascript:puttemplate("delete","{{d}}",0,0,0)', "delete", "");

Mushroom (Talk) 08:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I didn't realize it would get interpreted (but since "~~~~" does, I should have predicted it). I'll be more careful in future. Thanks again and sorry for the confusion! Misza13 ^{T C} 10:11, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Stop vandalising my page

I explain on my user talk page how I deal with posts. If you do not like it, we have to agree to differ. Reverts on other users' talk pages are vandalism and I expect you to stop it. ROGNNTUDJUU! 16:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

By saying "we have to agree to differ" you are basically saying "f*** you - I'll do it my way". And you can't deal with posts the way you like, because: 1. the talk page doesn't belong to you and 2. there are rules on talk pages here. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Rules about talk pages for sure do not say you should revert on other users' talk pages. I explained how I do it, I honour the rules by answering all honest questions, and now please stop your vandalism on my page. ROGNNTUDJUU! 16:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Many users do not archive but delete comments from their talk pages. Why do you single out this one? I see his point asking others not to cross out flags. De mortuis... 17:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

There is a difference between removing old discussions and warning notices. Misza13 ^{T C} 17:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I completely agree with ROGNNTUDJUU! that your warning was absurd, and so does Kingboyk. Stop bullying others. De mortuis... 18:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Sure truce. I will go and make a pudding now. ROGNNTUDJUU! 18:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your layout help. The pudding was delicious by the way, just let it cook a bit too long. Wanna share the recipee? ROGNNTUDJUU! 01:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for updating my vandalism counter.  :) - Trysha ^(talk) 09:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Renovate Page

Hi, I saw that you are doing userpage renovations and I was wondering if I could get mine renovated. Something like yours would be good. Thanks Leidiot 10:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Club of Rome

Hello Misza

Have you done any research or do you know anything about the organization called the Club of Rome? Quite obviously the initial entry was written by The Club of Rome itself which of course would fail to mention that in fact they are an organization dedicated to reducing the population of "undesirables" such as yourself. They are one of the leading proponents of these draconian New World Order methodologies which include cold malthusian analysis and a eugenics approach to "culling" the population.

Wikipedia could be a very liberating and informative source of real information about the world around us but first it has to have completely accurate information.

Have you researched before you deleted my accurate depiction of the club of Rome?

Christopher Broder (69.113.25.112 (talk · contribs))

Well, you didn't specify any sources either (and Wikipedia is not a place for your original research). Instead, you've been adding extremely POVish statements such as this one or this one. Not to mention that edits such as [5] and [6] have no place here and definitely fall under vandalism. And BTW, (and I hope I won't regret asking) under what criterion do I fall under the "undesirables" category (not that I care about some club at all, just curious about your judgement...)? Misza13 ^{T C} 12:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Birthday

^_^ Thanks. Happy early birthday to you, too! Big 18 for me tomorrow, though I still have a lot of work to do 'till I consider myself an adult :) — Deckiller 22:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

It is proper isn't it?

I do believe that my edits to Talk:Quantile are proper. Could you please comment on some sources I have compiled.

• Refactoring
• [7]

68.78.35.117 03:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but I see absolutely no connection between refactoring and almost completely blanking an article's talk page. That's vandalism. Misza13 ^{T C} 11:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The connection is that the objection is no longer valid seeing as how it has already been taken care of for over a month now, plus the fact that the entire post was expedited by an improper edit in the first place. In my mind the very least that could be done is change it to a notice that it is a common mistake to remove it from the article (which I do not think it is). The best reason for doing it is because the discussion as a whole is overly too long for such a simple mistake. I believe that Talk pages should have some current relevance to the current article or provide guidance to those in the future who may incorrectly edit the article. (unless my views are themselves misguided) Wikipedia:Wikipedia_maintenance#Talk_pages correctly summarizes my views of using archives on talk pages; Thats not to say that archives are bad style, because they do serve a useful purpose; However, if someone has the time and is willing to put in the required effort to filter out and compress the content, while still maintaining its' usefulness to the current discussion and article, then it should be done. Thank you for you input, I appreciate your feedback on this matter. (Now I would remove the previous sentence from future archives seeing as how it is superfluous to the main discussion.) (If you would rather this discussion be moved to my talk page, I would not have a problem with it.) 68.78.35.117 15:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I object to blanking (as opposed to archiving) talk pages, be the matter resolved or not. As Misza correctly points out, that's regarded as vandalism. I don't doubt for a second that you are armed with good intentions, but that's just not the way it's done here.

Secondly, the section you want to remove in talk:quantile is still unresolved, so please leave it there. Thanks. PizzaMargherita 15:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for commenting. I didn't know if it's resolved or not, so an inside view is helpful. I don't see any reason for the discussion to be removed (even if it's closed) - after all, the issue may rise again in future and the archive is a good point of reference in such cases. Also, why archive at all? The page doesn't look overly bloated with topics... Misza13 ^{T C} 15:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't quite suggesting that it be archived at its' current state, but when it does need to be archived, it would be easier to read if it was refactored. I consider "blanking" the article to be a lazy form of refactoring seeing as how it could be reworded as an faq or frequently made mistake; However, I considered the mistake to be uncommon (just a silly oversight), thus deciding to "blank" it all together. Assuming that the subject was truly resolved by all parties, would you be ok with changing it to more of a faq form (as opposed to blanking it outright)?68.78.35.117 19:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Well that settles it; I didn't know it was still unresolved... Although I must say that too me it appears to be resolved, but in either case I'll stop the edit wars.68.78.35.117 19:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Also, about the second reference you are citing, that's definitely not how it's done here. If you fuck up change your mind about something, you should use <strike>. PizzaMargherita 15:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Your comments seem to be at direct odds with Refactoring. Do you agree with my interpretation? Plus this it is not a matter of changing ones mind it is about the disscussion as a whole not being relevent to the current artical. (assuming of course that it was truly resolved.) (don't leave out the <del title="reason"> tag. :-) )68.78.35.117 19:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Re:Vandalism

Really appreciate the assisstance there. What is it with some people ? Find on my userpage a list of Wikipedia protocol that will be of use to you. Go ahead and make a copy for your use. Again, appreciate the assisstance. Martial Law 07:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC) :)

Happy birthday to you also

Finny the birthday panderichthys wishes you happy birthday.

Happy birthday! Our birthdays are one day apart :) — Deckiller 23:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

That's nothing yet! You share B-day with Ali K and FireFox on 25th. Meanwhile, I share with Karmafist and Pengo on 26th. 6 out of 300 Esperanzians on the span of 2 days! Now how's that for a Birthday paradox? Misza13 ^{T C} 00:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Enjoy! Cheers, Sango123 (e) 02:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Misza13! thanks for doing my user page by the way Leidiot 02:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday, see you on IRC, and have a good one! --Ali K 05:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday, you old geezer Thanks for helping on my user page! --D-Day ^{My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes} 12:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia wishes you a Happy Birthday!!

I saw on Esperanza it is your birthday? Congratulations!! Gryffindor

Thank you all! Misza13 ^{T C}

Thanks...

...for the birthday wishes :) — FireFox • T [14:11, 26 March 2006]

Esperanza

Thanks for the welcome. I'll do my best :-) —Whouk (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy birthday

Happy Birth day - I missed the party as I was detained at another wikipedian's birth day party. --Bhadani 16:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Birthday greetings

Belated greetings...

--hydkat 05:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Edit anniversary

Thank you, Misza13! :) Cheers, Sango123 (e) 03:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Block of User:Grue

Hmmm... Isn't 48 hours a bit too long for a "cool down" penalty? Misza13 ^{T C} 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Dear Misza13: In my opinion, no; I think 48hrs is about enough to give a proper forced protraction from the débàcle as 24hrs wouldn't really be enough to illustrate the gravity of why Wikipedia:Civility is necessary practice. I'd have agreed if the behaviour was less focused towards a particular debate, but in this case the temperature has got so hot that really a slightly longer block is the only solution. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 20:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

And the award for fastest draw on the revert button goes to....

Thanks for catching the blanking of my userpage so quickly! :) .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 01:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

for being the only one around me who had enough imagination to think of something for April Fool's Day. Seen my new boxes? ROGNNTUDJUU! 11:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I've noticed that you've been creating new ones like crazy. They're mostly harmless, but be careful: with all the recent fuss about userboxes... well, let's just say that some people hate them passionately and often go on killing sprees. Good luck! Misza13 ^{T C} 11:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Tut tut.

I saw ya makin' edits on my userpage then reverting them. Nothin' gets by me. *hands you a cookie* — natha(?)nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 00:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 01:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

HAHA

I actually thought Jimbo vandlized my userpage ILovEPlankton 21:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Spam message from MiszaBot

This is a spam message from the friendly Misza13's spam bot! This message carries virtually no information, so please feel free to delete it altogether.

User page

I happened upon your userpage and I must say, lookin' spiffy indeed. Very relaxing color scheme, nice layout, well organized; just felt you diserved recognition :) Anyway, cheers! _-M ^o P-_ 21:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! I've been stealing soft colors from Esperanza for a while and have recently moved my bulky userboxes to a subpage. Now I'm pretty happy with the layout. Make sure to check out all 3 status images! Misza13 ^{T C} 21:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Aww man, thats such a fluffy dog! I have a golden retriever. _-M ^o P-_ 22:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Von Neumann's catastrophe

I reverted the source box you placed on Von Neumann's catastrophe. I have confined the text of this article to only summaries of those things that are already said in other articles. The source of all of the information given is already in other articles in expanded form. Twenty links have been added to the article to provide source information. If you think that there is anything in the article that is not supported by the links provided, please list those things on the talk page. --Dragon's Blood 18:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying, but let's keep the rest of this content dispute where it belongs. Misza13 ^{T C} 18:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk page layout issues.

I have some layout issues on my talk page that I hope you can help me with (you'll be rewarded with the usual confections and cookies).

• When I comment to someone's comment on my talk page, it'll look like this.
• other times, it will look correct.

Thanks *hug* — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 23:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I think I've fixed it. Where are my cookies? Misza13 ^{T C} 12:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

For fixing my page, you get:

— nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 13:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. The vandal was funny! Royalbroil 01:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Status script.

I've noticed your status switcher script and it's much better than the one I use. I can't even remember who gave me the script I'm using now.

Anyway, there are some problems with the one I'm using now (the option to change the status is only seen on the watchlist or when I edit a page). I'm wondering if yours can somehow be adapted to use the scheme I'm using now (see User:nathanrdotcom/Status and User:nathanrdotcom/StatusDiv), with the status located where it is.

Any thoughts? — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 16:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Status script isnt working

I cant get the status script to work. I pasted the second script on that page into my monobook.js file, and I created the StatusTemplate thing, with the first section of code in it. It wont work though. Do you know what is wrong? Wikipeedio 20:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Not sure, especially because you changed the original function. Didn't it work in my version? Also, this line:

if (location.href.indexOf("User:Wikipeedio+"subpage"+&action=edit&newstatus=") == -1) return;

should rather read (note the placement of "s and +s):

if (location.href.indexOf("User:Wikipeedio"+subpage+"&action=edit&newstatus=") == -1) return;

otherwise, I'm not sure whether it will compile at all. Also, check whether the buttons link where they should. The "in" for example should link to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wikipeedio/Status&action=edit&newstatus=in Misza13 ^{T C} 10:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Oops, my bad. I forgot to bypass the cache by doing the CTRL+F5 thing. I fixed that one line, I didn't do it very carefully. It works now. Thanks for your help. Wikipeedio 15:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Perl Framework ??

I'd be interested in sharing notes or code. I am only reading, not writing, in my code so far, but I based my WP access code on User:Pearle code... what I have so far is at User:Lar/ClassificationTableGen (that code is a bit backlevel, it doesn't include any access code, but shows my direction) ++Lar: t/c 23:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

My code doesn't do anything terrific yet. It uses LWP::UserAgent to check out pages, then parses the HTML::Response to get the editing form as HTML::Form object. Then the user modifies the form's properties and UserAgent sumbits using $form->click. The biggest problem is writing error handling (which is modest yet). Wikipedia can generate an amazing multitude of errors. I plan to publish the module (Where has seen a draft of it) once it is more reliable. Misza13 ^{T C} 10:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

So you're not using the trick Pearle uses then of just finding the form box and stripping everything else away? That way seems to be a more text processing based approach than using the Form object. What errors are you running into? I haven't seen many yet. Interesting. I'll be keen to see what you've got once you're ready. Meanwhile I need to put up the module I made out of Beland's code which strips away all the command processing loops and leaves just the routines to get and put pages.. ++Lar: t/c 14:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Actually this is what HTML::Form does: [8]

@forms = HTML::Form->parse( $response )

It parses a HTML::Response (received from UserAgent), extracts all forms and returns them as objects in the @forms array. The errors are pure Wikipedia caused ones:

• After sumbitting the form, the response is usually a HTML 302 redirect. Sometimes it is not.
• There might be edit conflicts (so far I avoid them through "&section=new" editing).
• "Wikipedia has a problem", "You have been blocked" (in the case of bots).

Above all this, I have yet no mechanism that would verify if the edit succeeded despite errors. One could check the page history, but databese lags may prove it ineffective. I've also been thinking about connecting it to the IRC recent changes feed... (Which I do myself whenever the bot is doing the spamming.) Really, these are mostly ideas that yet need to be checked for viability. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining that. I did not realise you could use parse that way... "I am only an egg", but I would love to collaborate with you... As soon as I have my code to where I am happy, I'll come back here and leave you a link to the pages and would welcome your comments! ++Lar: t/c 16:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

A KISS Rfa Thanks

Thank you, I've been promoted. pschemp | talk 01:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Ikiroid/PimpMyPage

I thought removing "User Wikipedia" excludes userpages from the category, but perhaps I am mistaken. When I went to look at pages in the category, only one esperanza talkpage was listed, although I've created a link to it on Firefox's talk page. Care to clarify?--The ikiroid (talk/parler/hablar/paroli/说/話) 18:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, I've put the User:Ikiroid/PimpMyPage template on my user page as a test and it showed up in Category:Wikipedians in need of a better Userpage. So does FireFox's talk page. The new category name is shorter and better IMHO, so I guess there's no issue here. Misza13 ^{T C} 18:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, ok, I guess I did something wrong. My bad.--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 23:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Misza13, it is with a smile on my face that I place you into the elite bunch of Wikipedians that have received the Comedy Gold! award after seeing this bit of hilarity. --IronChris | (talk) 21:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I placed this on your talk page because I did not want to modify your awesome user page. Feel free to move it to where you see fit!

Heh, thanks! I'm doing my best to keep the fellow Wikipedians from going totally crazy about this userbox madness... Misza13 ^{T C} 21:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments and hurt feelings

I'm sorry but I cann't assume good faith in most of your comments in WT:ESP#Channel stats and I'm blanking them because they are not helping the conversation. Please do not restore them.

Basically the conversation went: you: "i support" <- now that was fine. it was neutrally worded and I didn't delete it

...then later...

you: "You need to grow up"
me: "NPA. Attacks aren't helping."
you: "Oh, I wasn't intending to attack you. Besides, you need to stop being childish" (that's two attacks, and one after I told you NPA. A non-constructive comment regarding my actions is still an attack)

As a fellow Wikipedian, you should know how your words can have an effect on others. Insulting the author of an idea instead of commenting on the idea itself is not constructive and hurts feelings.

WP:NPA is a policy for everyone, not just for you to break when you feel like it (then claim you weren't out to attack, then attack again to add insult to injury).

We've gotten along just fine until now, I don't know why you'd all of a sudden do this. It makes me sad & hurt. Quite honestly, there's a time and place for such comments and posting them in the middle of an idea proposal/vote isn't the right time or place.

I have a certain way I deal with problems based on personal experience. While it may not be the most ideal way, it works for me. (When I'm backed into a corner or there's more conflict than I know how to deal with, I leave) I'd appreciate not being called immature just because you don't agree with my problemsolving methods (or that my intent wasn't made clear). While you may not agree with the method I use to deal with conflicts, it doesn't give you the right to attack me because of it.

For the record and to clarify: I didn't leave because I wasn't getting what I wanted. I left because I needed some space. If you're not sure of my intentions, please ask (I won't consider it an offense) and I'll tell you. I'm pretty sure you know the old saying about making assumptions so I don't need to type it here.

Let's try to get along here, please? We're fellow Esperanzians and I don't see the reason why either of us should be attacking the other. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 22:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

As the idea of you guys engaging in verbal conflict frightens me, I just wanted to step in and say, don't take it further. Misza, if you respond to Nathan, don't apologize and antagonize at the same time. Nathan, see if maybe you accidentally hurt Misza or did something to provoke this. Just don't kill each other. _-M ^o P-_ 22:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

IMO, I did nothing to cause this. My way of dealing with too much conflict (which is leave the channel and try to process the events quietly, then come back when I'm less upset. In my own personal experience, that's the method that works for me, it's a protection mechanism. I have a lot of protection mechanisms) isn't a reason to insult me. We all have our own ways of dealing with conflict, that needs to be respected even though we may not agree with them.

You can see the comments that were deleted here (hmm, okay the first one was constructive [which I've just restored], the second was not) and here.

MoP: I appreciate your comment. It's very much needed. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 22:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but you two are friends. Better to stop then go down in a fiery wreckage. I agree that we all have personal ways of calming down; when I get a bit angry, I eat ice cream to get better. Well, perhaps Misza just got annoyed and thought that you were running away from the problem; hopefully, its just a small misunderstanding. But you did well to address the issue like a civil person, Nathan, so kudos for that. _-M ^o P-_ 22:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to think we're friends. I don't know what I'm supposed to think now. Admittedly, I was "running away from the problem" but not just for the sake of running away. I needed space. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 22:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

From what I can see, Misza was a bit frustrated; he didn't understand that you weren't leaving for good (I think). I only read the two links that you posted, and it seems this way. However, it should be alright when Misza gets back. _-M ^o P-_ 22:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I was leaving until I could find a better way to deal with the issues (I needed the time to calm down). I eventually talked to Where about it and we worked to deal with the issues addressed by the AC. If I had an "Advisory Council Complicated English to English" dictionary, it would solve most of the issues. If he wasn't sure why I was leaving the situation, he should've asked me what my intent was, instead of jumping to the conclusion that I was being "immature" and "childish". — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 22:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, we all have our bad days; maybe he was just having one. But I agree, you reserve the right to get your private space; hopefully it doesn't happen in the future. _-M ^o P-_ 23:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I have posted an official apology on WT:ESP#Channel stats. Misza13 ^{T C} 11:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for being willing to apologize. That's very important, and I wish everyone were able to apologize so willingly. I've gained respect for you. Sarah crane 19:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

My Visitor's Box

Hahaha, that's subversively clever! Na zdrowie!--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 00:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

I'm sorry this message is so late. Anyway, thanks for wikifying the code behind my user page. I want to give you a barnstar, but I don't know which format you would prefer. So, I'll provide the image:

[[:Image:Barnstar.png]]

And the text:

I award you this [[Wikipedia:Barnstars on Wikipedia|barnstar]] for your help on my user page. --[[User:TantalumTelluride|<span style="color:#CD6600;">Tantalum</span>]][[User talk:TantalumTelluride|<span style="color:#000080;">T</span>]][[User:TantalumTelluride/Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">e</span>]][[User talk:TantalumTelluride|<span style="color:#000080;">lluride</span>]]

Now, you can put them together however you want to. By the way, if Sango123 and I don't fix my user page again before you get back from your wikibreak, please come by and help us. Once again, thanks. --TantalumTelluride 03:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Status changer

Hi, thanks for sharing your status-changer JavaScript code. I've had a status indicator for a while (not as nice as yours), but no script, and I never seemed to get round to changing it. This script makes things much easier – Gurch 10:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Userpage Vandalism

I bestow the PSI Award to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health!

Thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my userpage. I appreciate it. -- Psy guy ^Talk 12:38, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Userbox wars

Here we go again. Will this ever stop? It has grown tiresome. Meanwhile, Doc accuses me of personal attacks. Please be honest with me? Was my comment really attacking? I'll change it if it was, but my gosh. People need to realize that the majority wants userboxes. --D-Day ^{My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes} 19:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

why did you withdraw?

why did you withdraw from the elections? ILovEPlankton 02:18, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

They were laid by a chocolate bunny. Go on, take them! :P _-M ^o P-_ 04:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter! :D _-M ^o P-_ 04:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

He is Risen!

Jesus Christ is risen today, Alleluia! our triumphant holy day, Alleluia! who did once upon the cross, Alleluia! suffer to redeem our loss. Alleluia! Hymns of praise then let us sing, Alleluia! unto Christ, our heavenly King, Alleluia! who endured the cross and grave, Alleluia! sinners to redeem and save. Alleluia! But the pains which he endured, Alleluia! our salvation have procured, Alleluia! now above the sky he's King, Alleluia! where the angels ever sing. Alleluia!

-- Psy guy ^Talk 06:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

More chocolate eggs for Misza13. :D Happy Easter! Sango123 (e) 16:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter! You'll note my latest comments on the deletion review page. Thought it'd make a lovely rebuttal. Regards, --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 11:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter/Have a good Passover/Have a nice day...or this bunny will eat you :) Where ^(talk) 15:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh dear. Why are the animals eating us? Can't we all just get along? --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 15:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Everyone else seems to have stolen all the good Easter pictures and stuff, but I wish you a Happy Easter all the same. — FireFox • T [16:24, 16 April 2006]

Happy Easter and a Merry Chrismas. ILovEPlankton 18:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, and the same to you! Happy Easter! -- Banez 18:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanx, happy easter to you too!...altho if you're in Poland, you're probably sleeping right now. In that case, happy belated Easter!--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 19:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter! These special Easter eggs were laid just for you by an evil bunny! — — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 21:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the chicky! I will treasure it always. :) pschemp | talk 05:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanx!

Thanks for removing the vandalism off my talk page.

--Primate#101 11:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Misza13 ^{T C} 12:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

A tiny favour.

Hi there Misza, I hope I'm not bothering you too much; I was just wondering, if you have any spare time in your busy schedule, could you look at the Editor review page and try to maybe review me? I'm trying to find out how I can improve and how I'm viewed on Wikipedia. Much thanks! _-M ^o P-_ 04:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Sure, Mopper. Just for the sake of giving myself at least 24 hours before posting anything else than {{test}}, I'll leave it until tommorow. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:45, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Trading spaces

Thanks

"Out", right.... ;) Thanks for your quick reversion. æle ✆ 2006-04-20t23:11z

Help needed with status changer javascript

I use a slightly-modified version of your status changer as follows:

// STATUS CHANGER
addOnloadHook(function (){
 var user = document.getElementById( 'pt-userpage' ).firstChild.firstChild.data;
 var subpage = "/status";
 var scheme = "/statustemplate";
 var linkprefix = "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:";
 var contribs = document.getElementById( 'pt-mycontris' );
 //Add the links
 addlilink(contribs, linkprefix+user+subpage+"&action=edit&newstatus=in", "In", "pt-status-in", "I'm in!", "");
 addlilink(contribs, linkprefix+user+subpage+"&action=edit&newstatus=busy", "Busy", "pt-status-busy", "I'm busy!", "");
 addlilink(contribs, linkprefix+user+subpage+"&action=edit&newstatus=out", "Out", "pt-status-out", "I'm out!", "");
 if (location.href.indexOf("User:"+user+subpage+";&action=edit&newstatus=") == -1) return; //Are we here to auto-edit the status?
 //Get new status
 status = location.href.split("=");
 status = status[status.length-1];
 //Modify the form
 document.getElementById('wpTextbox1').value = "User:"+user+scheme+"";
 document.getElementById('wpSummary').value = "Status: "+status;
 document.getElementById('wpMinoredit').checked = 'checked';
 //Submit it!
 document.getElementById('editform').submit();
});

However when I click on the "in", "busy" or "out" links, it only loads the edit window for my status page and just stops there. It doesn't change the text and autosave. I'm using Opera 9 (and IE7 beta occasionally), if that matters.

Hope you can help me figure out this one. Or if you can't help me, please point me to someone who knows how all this works. Thanks a lot! :-) Kimchi.sg | talk 01:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Followup to what we said over IRC: The script actually relies on the same case as the actual subpage name. Thus I kept the "/status" and "/statustemplate" in the script as well as the subpage names. It was the &amp;quot; and the extra ; that broke the script. It's working perfectly now. Thanks! :-) :-) :-) Kimchi.sg | talk 16:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Misza13/CURRENTMINUTEOFDAY

Saw your reply on Cyde's talk page (never took it off watch after leaving a message there some time ago), and wondered if you'd thought about using {{#expr:{{CURRENTHOUR}}*60+{{CURRENTMINUTE}}}}? Still painful calling on {{CURRENTHOUR}} and {{CURRENTMINUTE}} but... Jude (talk,contribs,email) 12:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Did you check out the content of {{CURRENTHOUR}} and {{CURRENTMINUTE}}? They're both huge #switches (actually series of #ifeq's but anyway...), so using them both would be an even greater strain on the servers. The Devs should invent some string-handling functions and that would solve the problem. Misza13 ^{T C} 12:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Re:Renovation

Hi Misza,

It really doesn't matter to me if you copy from someone else or come with something on your own. I just want it to look nice and pretty.

I'd like you to keep all exisiting info on the userpage as well as the subpages. I'd also like to see if possible, all my userboxes on the main page(all the categorized ones anyway).

Other than that, your only limit is your imagination. Take your time with it too. I'm in no rush. Drop me a fax if you have any more questions. Regards, --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 16:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Thank you for supporting me in the AC elections. ILovEPlankton 17:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower ^háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Community Justice Voting has Begun!

I see you've registered to vote in the Community Justice elections, and I'm just telling you that now you can vote!

Please cast your vote(s) at Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections/Voting; following instructions provided there.

Thank you,

Computerjoe's talk 12:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC) (current Chairman)

One FREE Vandalism

(where allowed by law. Shipping and handling not included. Some settling of contents may have occured in transit. Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball!!!) ++Lar: t/c 17:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Please watch your civility

Please assume good faith, and be more civil. Calling edits you don't like[9], or which don't meet your standards 'vandalism' may be regarded as a personal attack. This is not a word to be thrown about lightly. Thanks.--Doc ^ask? 21:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Request

If you have the time, could you take a look at this list and see if you can fix anything there for me? Thanks. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 03:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Some of this stuff will probably require a more general renovation of your userpage. I'd gladly attempt that once I'm done with D-Day's. Misza13 ^{T C} 09:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Eep @ renovation. Thanks. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 23:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Rendering

This page renders fine in Opera. "Tricks" are perhaps better left for other purposes. Anyway, thanks, -Will Beback 22:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Edit to User Talk:Quentin Smith

I saw this edit. Why did you change it from {{PAGENAME}} to {{PAGENAMEE}}? --—Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeMoney (talk • contribs)

Please remember to sign your posts. I changed that to fix the link to creating a new talk section. The {{PAGENAMEE}} parameter substitutes spaces with underscores. Without it, there was a space in the URL to new message, so the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quentin Smith&action=edit&section=new by clicking here] was incorrectly split into URL & link text parts after "Quentin" instead of "section=new" and thus didn't work. Misza13 ^{T C} 09:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Renovation Revisited

Thanks for your renovation on my user page! It is simply amazing! Here, I baked you this cake on my new oven.(Where did you find it? Lowe's?)

Image:Culinique.jpg

--D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 23:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

can you believe people?

Editing my talk page with out leaving a message, that is just mean! :) ILovEPlankton 00:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Just trying to be helpful - it's a bitch having to go into "edit" mode to read a talk page. But, if you prefer to have an invisible page, I guess that's your perogative. Cheers, -Will Beback 00:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

FYI, we solved it with a strategically-placed break. The boxes were stacked up side by side. -Will Beback 06:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Free vandalism

Just checking this offer is available outside the US as being from New Zealand I'd hate to be dumped with additional tarrifs or customs taxes - and I was looking forward to voting too! :) - Glen ^T_C (Stollery) 19:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

This is Internet, so uniform data shipping rates apply. But sorry again! :slaps self: --Misza13 ^{T C} 19:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

bunny

Thanks for the text bunny. It's cute! I don't know quite what you mean about the code. But whatever. :) --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 22:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Relax

Smorgasborg!

Take it easy over at Deletion review tiger! I'd hate to see you get called on for being incivil. Here, have some ice cream. It always makes me feel better! :-) --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 20:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not exactly relaxed, but I still have my fingers under control. That "get a life" comment was just an effect of me assuming that Kelly Martin is apparently bound by different civility standards, so I just adjusted myself. BTW, I recently feel I'm being watched closely by different sides. :) Misza13 ^{T C} 20:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Heh, I just had to create it: --Misza13 ^{T C} 20:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Why?

Why do you insist on restarting the userbox wars? Thats what your policy will do. ILovEPlankton 18:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

For one thing, the userbox wars are far from over. For second, unless one uniform policy regarding them is established, they will continue. My project aims as cutting it once and for all. No more WP:DRV/U, simply because the community says no to political/religious/etc userboxes in Template: namespace. No more TfD's on them, because they're (with few useful exceptions) no longer templates. I hope that clarifies and thank you for your attention on this matter. I'd like the policy reviewed before putting it officially for discussion. Also, I'd like further matters discussed on the policy's talk page, for the sake of greater visibility. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok you got me, the wars aren't over. We do need a uniform policy, and If you don't mind I would like to discuss the policy further on it's talk page. ILovEPlankton 20:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I think it's good. Instead of having things like This user hates topic X or This user loves topic X you can just make a userbox that says This user is interested in topic X.--The ikiroid (talk)^{(Help Me Improve)} 22:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

A public appeal to stop the fighting.

I am not your enemy and I'd like you to stop attacking me so that we can resolve this like adults. Think about what you're doing: We've been friends here for a while. We've helped each other out, been kind to each other, is this really the route you want to go?

However, if you keep attacking me, I'll have no choice but to ask for a block on you. WP:NPA is a policy of this site, and cannot be blatantly disregarded whenever you feel like it.

Please consider what you're doing. It's wrong to attack others. Please realize that the other person in a conflict has thoughts and feelings, even if you can't see them. — nathanrdotcom ^{(Got something to say? Say it.)} 17:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

There's incivility on both sides. Computerjoe's talk 17:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

He was incivil before and apologised. Now he's incivil again. A second apology will mean nothing (if he's really sorry, he wouldn't have been incivil after having apologised for being incivil some weeks ago. An apology is supposed to mean something). However, if he admits he made a mistake, that's some progress. But how will I know he won't fall back into the same pattern of attacking again and do it a third time? His word is meaningless to me now. (I realize Wikipedia is not a crystal ball). — nathanrdotcom ^{(Got something to say? Say it.)} 17:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Threatening for blocks to be made is not the way to go. Ian13/talk 21:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

After the above ("His word is meaningless to me now.") and after being threatened on IRC, I see no reason why I should assume good faith on Nathan's side and attempt further mediation. I also don't know why out of the entrire Esperanza I am being singled out as his greatest enemy. But, as follows my previous statement, I don't want to know. Misza13 ^{T C} 17:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hi, couldn't help but notice you've been voting delete on a lot of userbox review templates. Not trying to votestack, but what gives? Regards, --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 11:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, if you take a look at the "New messages" trick above and actually follow the link, things should become clearer. What I'd like to have is a policy that governs the userboxes and prevents the waste of Template: space for generally unhelpful (to the Project) stuff. If it looks the same before and after subst:, then why don't do it and help the servers? I noticed a similar policy being written by expansion of WP:CSD. Did you notice T2? That's some new stuff. Misza13 ^{T C} 12:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that T2 is taking no prisoners. That's why I backed out the userbox debates. Your proposed policy looks good, I'll definitely support it when voting begins. --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?}) 12:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Questions:(Reply at my talk page)

I'm actually running a survey but Tony sees it as spamming. So here it is: (You'll be the last person I'll ask)

Question 1. Are you an Administrator?

Not yet.

Question 2a. If you are when did you become an administrator?

Question 2b. If you're not has anyone nominated you to become one?

Not yet, but some have proposed that I should run (on IRC mainly).

Question 3. Would you like to become an administrator someday?

Yes, I would. My schedule plans an Editor review by the end of May and an RfA at least a month later.

Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 14:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Here you are. Cheers! Misza13 ^{T C} 14:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 14:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Re:Can I really edit here?

Yes you can. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 17:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Prettifying.

I'm just here to say, you did a good job in "prettifying" my "I drop this RfC" comment in the RfC. Kudos. (No, don't give me that suspicious look, you really did do a good job :-) - Nathan 14:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

A countersmile!

Nathan has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

Come back!

Please come back soon! Ian13/talk 20:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

 :sigh: If only it was that easy... Misza13 ^{T C} 21:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Come back when you feel like you want to. Just don't leave. Computerjoe's talk 18:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry. You won't get away from me that easy. But I got tired (and disappointed by a few people) and have some serious exams coming soon, so I figured out it's a good time for a longer break. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes: A New Proposal

Misza13, as you are the author of a proposal yourself, I invite you to read my essay on what should be done with the matter. Hopefully this essay (which tries to achieve a middle ground between the two sides) will become a proposal to attempt to change WP policy- because this debate is hurting Wikipedia and dividing the userbase too much. I would hope you could read my essay and comment, both on how to improve it and on how to make it into a proposal to vote to vote. Thanks! // ^The True _Sora 00:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Smile :)

G.He has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing! —G.He 21:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

ZOMG!

Thanks for the evil edit ;) — Nathan ^(talk) 02:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanx

Thanx for changing the cat. I'll fix the template. BTW, have you seen User:Ikiroid/The Gallery? I just created it this morning (well, morning in Illinois anyway).-- The ikiroid  18:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Rest

Hope that you feel better soon and be refreshed. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 20:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. My WikiMood is now better, but real life issues will keep me stressed for almost a month yet. Misza13 ^{T C} 20:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for cooling the debate off with user KAS. You did a great job. --Xyrael ^T 19:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. When I saw the discussion drifting to Nathan's page, I felt like I should step in and cool things down before he gets stressed again, or at least take some possible collateral flame damage on myself. My efforts didn't however get appreciated by Tony Sidaway (see KAS' talk page). Misza13 ^{T C} 19:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Not sure he meant that, but it's sorted now anyway. Thanks. --Xyrael ^T 20:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiLove!

Here's a pizza for you! Pizzas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:smile! Happy editing! ~Linuxerist (talk · contribs)

Template help

I noticed you have a lot of detailed cool templates on your userpage. Are you good at working with esoteric templates? I need some help with Template:Infobox WS.-- The ikiroid  13:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess I have some experience with templates (the peak of my experiments being User:Misza13/Random). I'll try to find some time. If you know what you want, I can help coding it. Misza13 ^{T C} 14:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, look at the template's talkpage, that's what we're aiming for. You see, we just took the template from Template:Infobox Language and copied it, but now we want to modify it and nobody in WikiProject Writing systems knows how :P.-- The ikiroid  15:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the happy birthday wishes, Misza13!  :) -- Natalya 14:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Misza13! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. You must really like making me approve you for things. First AWB and now this I can't take it!!!! ;-) Happy editing. Prodego ^talk 17:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Garh! I wanted to approve Misza! --Xyrael ^T 19:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, actually Prodego approved me so quickly that for a moment thought "is he a bot or what?" Really: I signed up, went back to my watchlist and 2x"Misza13 approved" were already there. :) Misza13 ^{T C} 19:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I was at a significant disadvantage, being out bell ringing. Humph. --Xyrael ^T 20:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Your polish userpage

May I suggest you moving your english level from 3 to 4? Or at least 3.5, if you would like to be modest. Your english is impressive, and flawless as far as I can tell ;).-- The ikiroid  22:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

"Near-native", huh? I'm flattered. :) I had my first contact with the language at the age of six and have been learning it ever since. But in fact, it's not that brilliant as it seems. The impression you get is created by a simple trick: I use Simple English (or, what I call it, "Internet English") - no complicated grammar structures, "difficult" words and such. If I started using them, I would get lost quickly and started making hideous mistakes. But thanks anyway. Oh, and there is no {{user en-3.5}}. ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 09:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Hmm...it doesn't seem like simple english to me, you write better than most middle-class midwestern Americans that I know. I've heard that if you begin learning a language before the teenage years it's easier to master, which may explain it. So what do you try to avoid writing? Passive voice? I'd be interested to know, I'm trying to learn French and Mandarin chinese, and I think passive voice is the hardest thing about a language.-- The ikiroid  14:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Passive voice is not avoided by me - it's only found sounding very "yodish" at times by me, no? ;-p I also didn't find it especially difficult, but then again, maybe it's a matter of thinking patterns and predispositions, which vary from man to man. And yes, learning "from the cradle" does help a lot - if not the very poor vocabulary, I could consider myself bilingual (actually I even studied in a "bilingual" class in the high school). With languages learned later in life (like german, russian or french), I have much more problems. The situation is on the other hand completely different when it comes to new programming languages, which I usually learn like blitz. Misza13 ^{T C} 15:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, so I see. It's always good to hear the viewpoint of another person learning language. Thanks ;).-- The ikiroid  15:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

^demon's sig

Could you explain that ~~~ business? That will print his name, yes, but the thing we're getting at is making the date slightly smaller. Who's misunderstanding who here? xD Thanks! --Xyrael ^T 12:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

The thing is, that ~~~ puts the content of the "Nickname" field in Special:Preferences. ~~~~ puts that and the date (unformatted). So, if you put {{subst:User:Whatever/sig}} there and the template will contain the date trick (like ^demon's does), then it's enough to sign with 3 tildes, as 4 tildes would put that and the date (I feel like repeating myself :-P), which would result in two dates being written (one from the template and one from the fourth tilde). Oh my! That was supposed to be an explanation, but reading this, I'm not sure I'd fully understand it... Misza13 ^{T C} 13:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I get what you mean now, and I've given it a shot. However, templates never work in raw signatures, or so I've discovered. It doesn't work :( Any other ideas? Thanks for trying! --Xyrael ^T 12:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so it does! Wow! However, I can't use this with VandalProof and the like because these automatically use which stops me as it'll display the date twice, unfortunately. --Xyrael ^T 12:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I've been wondering that for awhile now. I meant to log it with Daniel to see if he could work a way into the next release for custom sigs, but I just hadn't gotten around to it and I did. That's the only major issue I have with using VP right now. ^demon^{[yell at me]}_{[ubx_war_sux]} /19:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll link these pages together. --Xyrael ^T 19:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Hole in the wall

Hello. I noticed that you recently welcomed User:Hole in the wall to Esperanza [10]. However, please note that that user's account was only created on June 3 and that he/she only has about 47 edits in all as of 00:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC). That does not meet the requirements for membership, so be sure to check the users before welcoming them. Thanks. G.He 00:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

In short: take a look at this edit and 2 subsequent ones, plus the top of the Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Members#Putting the 'green' letters in signature post. I trusted Joanne's judgement. Cheers! Misza13 ^{T C} 12:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

-.- Must be overworking... (See my talk header. Why am I even online?) I swear I saw that comment in the edit history before I wrote the previous message, yet somehow missed that... I'm really sorry about that. Now I'm gonna punish myself by doing more work! :P G.He 02:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

It's early July, now

Unless someone else has got there first, would you accept a nomination for adminship from me? You have consistently shown yourself to be trustworthy and a worthwhile member of this project and I see no reason why it wouldn't succeed. You may prefer someone else to nominate you; if this is the case I won't be offended - just let me know :) --Xyrael ^T 11:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Sincere apologies - I'm getting too enthusiastic about the presence of the end of the school year and getting month names mixed up. :S --Xyrael ^T 11:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, for me it is exactly one more month of tortures to go - hence the estimated July. Not that I'm sure I'll have more time there... And yes, I'd prefer being nominated by an admin. So, if you still have chance, since (one week of RfA) < (one month). ;-) But thanks anyway. :-) Misza13 ^{T C} 12:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

RE: IRC bot

I'm re-enabling him then - thanks for keeping me informed. Good luck with getting Bob back, and see you on the channel. --Xyrael ^T 17:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

hehe.

Naughty naughty :) — Nathan ^(talk) 19:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I almost thought you wouldn't actually check why was it commented out. ;-P Misza13 ^{T C} 19:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

God, I thought that was real for a second.. I was thinking: Darn, there went my clean block log. :p Hmm... I didn't know evil was trademarked. Thanks for the message Cheers! The King of Kings 21:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:Trusted Users MfD

Hi,

As you should know, only administrators may close XfDs, unless the decision is completely without controversy (ie. unanimous, or very close to that.) You closed this MfD prematurely. In my judgment, it is not without some controversy, as there are several outright delete votes. I have reopened the discussion. Please refrain from closing controversial XfDs until you gain adminship. Best wishes, Xoloz 00:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, for me it looked like almost all votes were either keep with {{rejected}} or delete, which I believe should mean "reject" in the case of proposals as well. Additionally, Xaosflux already tagged it as such, so I considered my closing more of a janitorial work than an actual decision (yeah, I admit, I forgot to take the MfD tag down along). But if you say so, I won't touch XfDs again. Misza13 ^{T C} 07:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't mean to sound too harsh! :) (I have a very nasty cold, and may be snappier than I think I am.) I'm sure you'll be an admin soon enough -- it's just that, that particular discussion had too many delete votes to be closed early by anybody (IMO), much less a non-admin. Best wishes, Xoloz 17:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

IRC linking

Sorry for making a mistake on Bob's page. Under mIRC, I'm told (I don't use it) that without a hash it adds one, so for a double hash you use two. --Xyrael ^T 12:01, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Wdefcon

Thanks the for update. They've been {{db-owner}}'d. --Zsinj^Talk 13:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:Them userboxen

Sorry your policy didn't fall through; if you haven't already, check out WP:DEUTSCH.-- The ikiroid  16:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

And I'm not sorry. :) I feel it might have kinda inspired the other proposals (like WP:MACK). And if it changed at least one editor's view on the userboxes, then it was worth the trouble. Anyway, the implementation of WP:DEUTSCH is the main reason I have decided to close the discussion. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, OK. Just making sure.-- The ikiroid  18:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

P.S. I hope your exams go well.-- The ikiroid  18:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

So far, so good. Thanks! Misza13 ^{T C} 18:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for reverting Cyde's reversion. I'm starting to wonder if he's trying to make some attempt at civility by reverting what he thinks is vandalism. — Nathan ^(talk) 18:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. Let's just say that some people have an incompatible sense of humo(u)r. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

/me deletes Cyde. DELETE DELETE DELETE. *runs off* — Nathan ^(talk) 19:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

/me chases Nathan with a large trout for repeatedly pinging his talk page. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

zOMG PONG! — Nathan ^(talk) 19:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Bot code?

Hello , Misza13. What code does your bot run on? May I know where to download the program?-- 陈鼎翔 贡献 和 CCD Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I have written him in Perl. Entirely from scratch, i.e. from the sockets through the IRC protocol up to the entertainment functions. It's not available for download yet, but when the codebase becomes stable and I clean the code up, I'll release it. If you're still interested, I could probably send it to you via e-mail or something (once I finally tag the files with proper licenses). Misza13 ^{T C} 16:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Archiving bot

Sweetness! :) :) :)

Is this service open to the public yet? -- Where is Where? 21:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

It stiil needs some ironing, like adding config files (with any custom archiving schemes possible). I also have to do something with this - the bot leaves some unnecessary newlines on the talk - apparently, blanking a section (the bot does &action=edit&section=1 and determines if a section qualifies for archive) does not wipe it out entirely - a newline is still left. It should be ready soon tho - interested? :-D Misza13 ^{T C} 09:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

A bit of a problem with your status-switcher script

{{User:Super-Magician/StatusTemplate|undefined}}

I would appreciate any help you could give. — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 19:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

That's a weird error. Two questions that can lead me to solution:

1. What's the browser you're using?
2. What's the exact URL the "in" (for example) button leads to?
3. Is the URL the same as what appears in the adress bar moments before the status gets saved.

Yes, I know the last question looks silly, but I'm investigating all kinds of possibilities (like the other included scripts modifying the address for some reason). Misza13 ^{T C} 19:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response.

1. Internet Explorer 6 (SP1) on Windows 2000 (SP4) (I can try it using IE 6 on a Windows XP SP2 system, but I doubt it would make any difference)
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Super-Magician/Status&action=edit&newstatus=in
3. Yes.

By asking me #1, could you be hinting that I must use Mozilla Firefox? And, by the way, that was three questions.

— Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 20:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so now I know where in the code the problem is located, but still not sure why it doesn't work. I did a minor update to User:Misza13/Scripts/Status switcher. Reinstall/copy again (remember WP:CACHE) and try again - does same thing but in a different way. Yeah, it was 2 questions when I started writing it, but thought of the 3rd later. And yes, using Firefox is surely a good idea. :-D Misza13 ^{T C} 20:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

All right, after that update, it works! Yes!! Thanks so much!! :D — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 21:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Good to see that. Way to go, me! World saved again! Ehem... Note to self: stupid IE probably doesn't handle the .split() method. Regular expressions work fine. Misza13 ^{T C} 21:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

more care when reverting, please

I was aware that that was wrong because I had only just fixed that error myself (in between the vandalism) but a quick revert with that in it was not a problem as that text was hidden you then nipped in before me to fix the last bit. Jooler 12:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the stub sorting

WOW!!! You are a super coder :D. Yeah; adding stubs manually probably isn't such a good idea. What could be done, however, is writing a perl script to fetch the stubs page, parse it, write the script, and dump it (using your perl framework) to User:Misza13/ss.js. This page can then be included in monobook.js. Also, for this to fit the screen, maybe the menu should start somewhere else further to the left (like in the toolbox?). Just suggestions, of course. -- Where is Where? 14:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Damn n00bs.

I deleted the section you just commented in (this one) and just gave the newbie involved a stern talking to about TYPING LIKE THIS and netiquette. Hopefully, the do's and don'ts of what to do and what not to do will actually sink in. — Nathan ^(talk) 00:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Status changer

Hi. I was putting up your status changer, but I can't seem to get it to work! I copied the following code:

'''<div style="border: 1px solid black; background: white; float: right; position: relative; top: -30px; padding: 5px">Example's status: {{ #switch: {{{1}}}
 | in=<span style="color: green;">IN</span>
 | busy=<span style="color: #FFAA00;">BUSY</span>
 | out=<span style="color: red;">OUT</span>
}}
</div>'''

onto this page, and I placed {{User:Oreos/StatusTemplate|STATUS}} onto this page. I installed Add LI link onto my monobook.js as well as the function you provided, but the 'in' 'busy' and 'out' functions don't appear. Any idea why? Øřêōş^{Go Italia!} 19:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Weird. I have copied your monobook to mine and it works fine (i.e. they show up). Did you purge the cache of your browser? Or maybe you didn't notice them? They should be to the left of the "logout" button. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

da Vinci Barnstar

Check this out, da Vinci Barnstar. --evrik 15:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

MiszaBot a bit strange

Dropped a note on MiszaBot's talk page; you might want to stop it and take a look. ~ PseudoSudo 16:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Logged out. ~ PseudoSudo 17:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, that was ten minutes ago; nevermind. ~ PseudoSudo 17:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, the "ARRAY" thingy was obviously my fault, as I made errors in the configuration file. The logged out bug is more of a mystery - I have no idea why it happened. The bogon radiation is my only explanation so far. Thanks anyway! Misza13 ^{T C} 17:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

217.206.224.221

Saw you're reverting 217.206.224.221 on Tattoo, Thanks I missed one. I've given him a block warning if continues I'll WP:AIV Cheers Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 11:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the quick revert on my userpage! -- Ferkelparade π 14:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Awesome.

I was patrolling recent changes and kept seeing "Magdalen College School, Oxford" on the list, and had to see what that was all about. I don't know why someone's vandalizing that page, but you're doing very well at thwarting it. Just thought I'd stop by and say "good job", because fighting vandalism shouldn't go unrecognized. —Helfaery 11:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

User:F 22

Can you help me with my linier and quordinate geometry???? i hate maths it should be blown up! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by F 22 (talk • contribs) .

I probably could. But you should really try to do your homework on your own! Plus, you really shouldn't be saying "i hate maths it should be blown up" to a matematician. ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 12:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

my oops on C-119 Flying Boxcar

Thanks for catching my error. Firefox seems to be getting worse about that bug [11]. --rogerd 16:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. I'm regularly reverting such Google Toolbar blankings and don't even bother with warnings. This is seems a new RC patroller's plague. Hope they fix it quick. Misza13 ^{T C} 17:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, I de-installed the Google Toolbar for now. I will keep following this bug and not re-install it until it is fixed. But I saw that it is not certain that the toolbar is the cuprit. --rogerd 00:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

My dear Misza

My dear Misza, your extremely kind words and your beautiful gift mean so incredibly much to me, that I'm not sure I can express it properly. I'll display it with pride, you can count on it. I did notice your previous hard work on the Native American Portal, and your excellent work did it all much more clear and easy for me - and this is also the perfect oportunity to invite you to retouch it all you want. I hope this is but the beginning of a long friendship, since it's not everyday that I get approached out of the blue by one of the kindest Wikipedians I've ever seen. A big big hug, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 21:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

RE: Birthday

Thanks a ton! Hopefully the next one doesn't come for a while. >_< Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Giant Enemy Crab!} 05:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Call for consensus on fan site list on Andy Murray page

Hello Misza13,

You've probably noticed my (probably foolhardy) attempt to resolve the edit war on the Andy Murray page regarding fansites. The protagonists do not look about to resolve it among themselves, so I'd appreciate it if you and other regular editors could express your views on this part of the page, so that we can stop the war going forward, or at least block a protagonist who persists in it. Please come to the talk page here

The questions I've put are:

Please can I have the opinions of those who regularly edit this site:

1.Should there be a list of fansites?

2.Should it be ordered

a) alphabetically

b) by site's popularity or quality

c) by some other factor

3. If by popularity/quality how to judge this?

Thanks RobbieC 21:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

No thanks. I only reverted vandalism/Google Toolbar malfunction on that page and am certainly not interested in your edit war. Misza13 ^{T C} 21:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Deleting my edits

Dear Misza13,

Why did you delete my edits to User:Nathanrdotcom? 81.158.86.241 17:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Not to be rude but user pages are for users to tell the world about themselves and user talk pages are for other users to leave comments, not the reverse. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 18:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)}

Thanks Misza!

Hi there. I would like to thank you very much for your vote in the Esperanza Elections, your trust in me was appreciated and I hope I will be able to live up to your expectations in the future. Thanks again! Regards -- Banes 09:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza Elections

Misza13

---

Thank you for your vote in the Esperanza Elections. Your support is much appreciated, and it means that I am now in the Council. I will continue to try my best, and if you have any questions or queries, please don't hesistate to leave me a message. Thanks again, — FireFox 15:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Lots of thanks

I offer many thanks to you, Misza13, for your support in the Esperanza elections! Your confidence means a lot, and I look forward to working to better Esperanza. -- Natalya 01:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Nazi symbols

Nazi symbols Ilya K 12:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Python

Where did you learn python? GangstaEB (sliding logs~dive logs) 01:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

From books mainly. I started with Python. Pocket Reference, but it was too concise. Later, I studied some example code for the pywikipedia framework and finally bought Python Cookbook, which should now serve all my further needs (like Perl Cookbook does). Misza13 ^{T C} 15:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This Anti-Vandalism Barnstar is awarded to you because of all of the work you have done reverting vandalism. Gray Porpoise 01:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey thanks for the CSS. :P My browser seemed to cope quite well. Here's to many more wikibirthdays! Cheers -- Banes 18:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Cool Barnstar above too btw. And why didnt you tell me you were up for adminship you scamp! I might have missed it... -- Banes 18:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Poland question

I find it somewhat suprising - not in a negative way, just suprising - that a active editor from Poland, one who is now applying for adminship, seems to never involve himself with WP:PWNB...? Well, you added yourself to the participant list, but I don't recall you posting there. Any particular reason why?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. I'm usually so preoccupied with maintenance work (like reverting vandals) that I don't find time for "real" article editing, much less visiting our cabal's den. Moreover, whenever I read PWNB, I have a bad luck at finding issues with someone altering Poland-related articles in a sneaky way, and such edit wars just drive me away. I promise I'll try to improve, boss. ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 19:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the answer. Do what is most fun for you, wikignome work is much appreciated. Although I we need more users involved in some discussions, on the other hand, being less involved in some content disputes makes you a more neutral admin then I am - so feel free to keep on doing what you have. Wiki needs us all. Keep up the good work! PS. If you are familiar with bots, there is something related to geography of Poland Wikiproject and pl wiki that User:Balcer (IIRC) wanted to do, you may want to talk to him.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 01:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Mazel tov!

Congrats on reaching WP:100!!! -- Where 17:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! :-D Next stop, WP:200. ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 17:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks :). Sadly though, I think the rate of RFA supports has a strong inverse coralation to the amount of people who have already supported (now that is something that would probably be fun to fit a regression line to :) ). Still, I hope you get it anyway. Maybe more people would notice you if you changed your IRC nick to Misza13|rfa? Then again, people might oppose because of attempts to publicize your RFA if you did that. -- Where 22:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Nage drove ya

Yeah Meesh, you shoulda told me! I've been watching your talkpage for an RfA (I was too afraid of screwing up the nomination to nom you), and all of the sudden I'm passing thru WP:RfA and there's you! It was like the Twilight Zone.....your nomination was already halfway down the page! Best of luck as an admin!--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 19:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, advertising one's RfA has been frowned upon in the past, so I chose to keep a low profile. All I did was actually changing the "Admin hopeful" userbox on my main userpage to "Admin nominee" (even that's hard to spot, since they're all rolled up). I'm glad you found it anyway. I have {{User:Dragons flight/RFA summary}} transcluded on my Desk, so it's harder to miss someone I'd care to vote for, BTW. Misza13 ^{T C} 20:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Ah, so I see.--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Misza13, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.

Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 10:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

A new RfA Q

Just to let you know, Viva La Vie Boheme! added a simplw last minute Q on your RfA. Not that it'd make any difference answering it to the result of the RfA, but having a nice completed flawless RfA to look back on and be proud of would be nice.--Andeh 02:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

comments

Hi, Misza13, thanks for your comments on my page and happy editing to you, too! Shannon^{duck talk} 16:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Misza13: I try to AGF but I think that vote may be against the spirit of the RFA process (although I'm not expert, so I'm not sure). I heard that sometimes people asked 'crats if this was the case, and, if so, obtained permission to cross such votes out; maybe you should ask? On the other hand, maybe doing so would cause wikiStrife, and thus may not be worth it. Just something to think about. -- Where 20:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Totally not worth the potential fuss. I'll leave it be. BTW, the RfA is now 2.5 hrs after deadline. Where's the 'crats when you need one? :-P *Considers an RfB to speed it up...* Misza13 ^{T C} 20:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

 :) -- Where 21:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations

I saw your RfA just closed with a remarkable 132 supports. Congratulations! Welcome to the mop. Best, Gwernol 01:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Amazingly, one of the bots reported an extra 22 oppose votes, and yet you still would have passed if they were real . NoSeptember 01:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations

After an impressive showing of community support, you're now an admin. Use the new tools wisely, as questions whenever you may be in doubt, and re-read the policies before taking action. Have fun, and let me know if I can help with anything. And find 4 more good admin candidates! :) Anyway congrats again. - Taxman ^Talk 01:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Mazel tov! -- Where 01:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats!

Congrats, and I apologize for the lengthy speech on your RfA page in response to the oppose vote; I was trying to neutralize all the back and forth comments with a compromising point of view. — Deckiller 02:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! Make good use of your tools, and you will be a fantastic admin. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 04:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations and all the best. --Bhadani 09:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Michael 09:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats and well done! (happy I could squeak in a support before it closed) -- Samir धर्म 09:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

The mop is yours!

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian (T, C, @) 09:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Well done on your very successful RfA. Happy mopping!  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  11:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats!

You'll be a great admin! :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 09:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Choose a mop!!

Misza13, I'm really glad that you not only are now an admin, but you're also in WP:100! Seeing as you'll be needing them, why not choose from this fine selection of mops? I'm sure you'll continue to be as great an admin as you are a user. Cheers, Thε Halo ^Θ 09:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Oy! Hearty congratulations on your promotion, it was well deserved. As said above, I'm sure you'll make a great admin, and an abusive one too I don't doubt. :P Enjoy your new buttons! Oh, and happy edit day too! w00t my account is 4 days older than yours. (Sticks out tongue childishly.) -- Banes 10:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Well done! Seivad 12:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day (a day early)!

I'm going to be looking at colleges for the next few days, so I thought I'd post this now:

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Misza13/Archives/2006 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

More Congrats

Well done on your RfA, outstanding support across the board. Use the tools wisely and happy mopping. Best wishes. --Cactus.man ✍ 10:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Belated congratulations from me as well! I must have just missed it... CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 13:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats from me too: if I hadn't missed your RfA, I would have supported it :) Mushroom (Talk) 13:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

4.243.215.217

This is your first block and I feel it is wonderful. He have constantly stated that his link is legitamte link for infomation. Can you please watch him and if he gets out of the line can you do what administrators do best? -ScotchMB 12:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats and, perhaps, an apology.

My heartiest congratulations on a successful candidacy! My only regret is that it appears that my asking you the questions I did set off that user's diatribe which marred your perfect unopposed record. I do apologise for that (but won't stop asking the question, it's a good one...) All the best of luck and I look forward to working with you more! ++Lar: t/c 12:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I also regret that my RfA didn't finish spotless, but I don't blame you. That was indeed a very good question and some user's reaction is certainly not your fault. I believe it does take some time to understand that WikiPolitics and what you name them doesn't really matter, but rather the goal itself. Happy editing! Misza13 ^{T C} 13:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Awesome job!

How about some ice cream? ;) The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 13:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

My congrats.

I see your RFA passed successfully. I hope you have fun with your new tools. Remember, always use caution when you need to block. Mostly Rainy 14:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats on your RfA

I now realise that I shouldn't have supported at your RfA. As Shannon says, the fact that so many people support you clearly shows that you are not suitable for adminship. --David Mestel^(Talk) 16:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Could you please explain what in the world has the ammount of support votes to do with suitability for adminship? This is just beyond my understanding... Misza13 ^{T C} 16:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I think that he felt that the large number of supports showed that you had rigged the RfA. However, given the large number of entries on WP:100, this is patently false. --David Mestel^(Talk) 17:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I wish Shannon heeded my advice, since someone may use that voting issue against him in the future. — Deckiller 18:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Good point. --David Mestel^(Talk) 18:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Concerning User:Storminnorman789

There is no real pertinent information left on this user's talk page. I think we can clear it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.216.135.41 (talk • contribs) .

Let the user decide for himself if (s)he wants it archived/removed/whatever. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

typo

congrats on becoming an admin and thx for the thank you note, thought i'd mention there's a typo in it... the word "to" is missing in the first few words: "Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports" Themindset 16:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. That's not the only error in the message though. But it's also loaded with pranks of some kinds. ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 17:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Another typo ... you didn't get the support/oppose vote count correct. You used 0x, implying hexadecimal, but the number you gave in hexadecimal doesn't even come close to matching the actual number of support votes you got ... Cyde↔Weys 17:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

That's exactly what I had in mind above. When the RfA was about to close, it was 127 and then I made the error, writing 0xFF instead 0x7F when composing it. Then 5 more votes came in and you can figure the 0x0104 now. :) Misza13 ^{T C} 17:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

GeorgeMoney ^(talk) 18:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA and your vote

Hey Misha, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I was delighted to see you turn out to support--hopefully someday I'll live up to the user you are! You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page. Sincerely, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me)

Congrats!

Big congrats on receiving the mop! I know you will wield it wisely! Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 17:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

No need to thank me, you should thank yourself :) //Halibutt 14:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Protection

A few pointers:

• The article featured on the Main Page should not be protected. Many edits (and much vandalism) is to be expected, and protection is not the answer. Although opinions on this do vary, the consensus on Wikipedia:Protection policy is that we benefit more from people being able to edit these articles than we suffer from having them vandalized (past history consistently shows articles improving from their exposure on the Main Page, even if it also takes continuous reverting of vandalism).
• If you do protect an article, please follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Protection policy. In particular, add the page to the list of protected pages specifying a reason, and place the appropriate protection template at the top of the article. This helps editors to recognize what's going on, and it allows the wikignomes to find and unprotect pages that have been protected for too long.

Protection is a powerful tool; use it sparingly. It makes our lives easier, but that's not its primary purpose. JRM · Talk 21:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Cryptography was getting a hard beating for the last few hours with no good edits in sight (FA articles don't need much innovative edits anyway). I also didn't put the {{sprotected}} template, because it's too ugly for a Main Page article. (A pretty of a dilemma here, huh?) But thanks for the guidelines. I'll keep them in mind and will "revert till doomsday". ;-) Misza13 ^{T C} 21:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

The guideline isn't really what the ratio of good to bad edits is (because if that were the case, countless pages that are rarely edited would "deserve" protection), but how much trouble we have keeping up with them. The Main Page article will get hammered by vandals hard, but it will also be closely watched by the RC patrollers. When the smoke clears, the article is usually no worse for the wear, and has typically picked up a few improvements from casually visiting experts (yes, we get those too, not just 12-year-olds making asses of themselves :-) that our regular contributors simply missed. That "FA articles don't need much innovative edits" is quite correct, but nobody is asking for "innovative" edits. Any good edit will do! Don't think that a featured article is "finished"—it's a little more stable than a non-featured article, but that's all. FAs can be and are regularly improved, sometimes quite drastically (don't take my word for it; watch some for a longer time).

Basically, though, you can think of it as a PR issue. We advertise as "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit". Imagine new editors going to the first article they see, and finding out they can't edit it... Being "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit, if not too many people are actually doing it, because then we can't really be bothered to keep things in shape" doesn't sound half as impressive (and worse, it will make people think that Wikipedia doesn't work after all, since we apparently can't handle vandalism). Keeping the featured article unprotected is a kind of public service, one that we've had no trouble providing in the past. JRM · Talk 22:19, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Well Done!

Well done on getting admin status!!! -- Legolost 20:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 01:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou

For your help. please let him know that I will not tolerate any more. I have tried to be civil and it has gotten to me. I did get a little angry. Sorry for getting out of line so please let me know of what i can do to get back to a civilized community. >--Qho 16:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)<

Just drop it. It's really that simple. You drop it, he drops it and everyone's happy. If someone doesn't and pesists, I'll just block, because neither will I tolerate any more incivility by either side. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Toolserveraccount

Hello Misza13,
please write your prefered login-name, your real name and the public part of your ssh-key to . We plan to create your account in the near future. --DaB. 14:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!

A great administrator you will be! :) All the best! -Mike Judgesurreal777 00:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

I stole your RFA box

Hi, Misza13. I have an RFA that will close soon, so I took the liberty of using your html box as my thank you note because I can't code HTML to save my life. I hope you don't mind. Just for reference, here's the box I created:

Thank you so much for voting in my recent RFA. It passed on the relatively narrown vote of 36/8/7. It was also one of the least-participated-in RFA nominations in several months, so pat yourself on the back, and join the party on your left, but first, take your cookie! NOTE: I can't code HTML to save my life. I copied this from Misza13. I guess I should write him a thank you note as well. Cookies sold separately. Batteries not included. Offer not valid with other coupons. May contain peanuts or chicken. Keep out of the reach of small children, may present a choking hazard to children under the age of 3. Do not take with alcohol. This notice has a dark background and therefore may be eaten by a grue at any time. The receiver of this message, hereafter referred to as "Pudding Head" relinquishes all rights and abilities to file a lawsuit or any other litigious activities. RyanGerbil10, Jimbo Wales, and the states of Georgia, North Dakota and Wisconsin are not liable for any lost or stolen items or damage from errant shopping carts.

I hope it does your excellent sense of humor justice. Cheers, RyanGerbil10 (Drop on in!) 05:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Misza13/Archives/2006, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE*
	Wishing Misza13/Archives/2006 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Have a great day! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 13:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day! May you have many many more at Wikipedia. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 17:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

To make for First Edit Day bright and cheerfull a little sun Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 17:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I wish you happy wiki-birthday - a day late. Somehow, I could not come to the party yesterday. --Bhadani 15:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

My belated wiki-birthday wishes. All the best in the coming years ahead and make good use of your shiny tools. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 09:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Things that rock for a thousand, Alex

• What is a script that every wiki-n00b should know about, as it would have prevented several accidental edits? Thx! -- MrDolomite | Talk 16:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• You're welcome. I did't find it any useful, but I have created it by a request on WP:US. Misza13 ^{T C} 21:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Another RFA Congrats

I haven't had time to contribute lately, but I've been checking WP:RCA and a few other pages occasionally. I'm glad to see that you were approved for adminship. Please keep up the good work. --TantalumTelluride 19:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

On blocking users

Hi, the next time you block a user, could you remember to leave a note on their talk page telling them (and others) why? It's helpful documentation for both the blocked user and other admins. --Improv 20:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Which user in particular do you mean? I thought I did leave tags either on talks (in case of IPs - unless it's a 15' AOL block) or on User: (in the case of indef vandals-only accounts). If I have missed some though, I'll be more thorough then. Misza13 ^{T C} 20:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• My apologies. In digging through the user's talk page, I found the warning -- it was up higher than I thought it was due to considerable talk since. Take care. --Improv 04:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Please take care blocking User:Stefanalexei. It's an AOL dynamic ISP, so blocks should be kept very short (I've been blocked as collateral damage six times already today on this address. jimfbleak 12:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The problem with blocking users is that when a username is blocked, the IP behind it is autoblocked, and for privacy reasons we as administrators are not given the IP address so we can manually unblock it seperately. If you report the block # (it'll say #1246432 or something) and request that # unblocked, we can do that seperately. Thank you for your understanding. :) ~Kylu (u|t) 03:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

He

Why are you saying that I vandalized he removed all of my userboxes and I can't remove stuff from his page. --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 19:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I checked his edits and couldn't find where did he remove any userboxes. Show me the diffs, please. Misza13 ^{T C} 19:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Please

Please Can you just mind your business. Please, no offense, no disrespect. --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 20:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

It's not about minding my business. Your behaviour is disruptive and that's unacceptable, thus I'm intervening. Misza13 ^{T C} 20:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

I cannot thank you enough for helping me, and the rest of the WikiCommunity in battling the Kitten Vandal. You have repeatedly blocked sockpuppets of the vandal before I can even load the WP:AIV page! Just a side note: any sockpuppets that you see, please add them to WP:LTA, under 'Kitten Vandal', as that will aid the investigation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richard0612 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC).

I was watching the new new user log, so I was able to catch some of them before they even contributed. And in reporting them, you edit-conficted with me. :) And by the way, remember to sign your posts with ~~~~. Happy editing! Misza13 ^{T C} 21:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Request

Hi, i would like to vandalize both your user page and your user talk page but first i thought it would be civil to ask for your permission. so, is that ok?222.238.185.84 13:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Nice of you to ask, but no. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

GG?

It's nice to be able to keep in touch via GG in some cases. You can find my number at my user page, and most of our noticeboard users are active on that network.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk}  15:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

I used it in the past, but not anymore for a few months. Actually, I use Skype more often (but still very rarely). The best way to catch me real-time is IRC. I'm in about 10 WikiMedia-related channels. Misza13 ^{T C} 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Kitten Vandal

I have created a subpage on WP:LTA about the Kitten Vandal, after enquiring on the talk page, and feeling that it would be easier for users and admins to act if a MO and actions were listed. As you have helped a great deal on this issue, I thought it only polite to inform you of the new page. Any further information about the KV can be put here. ><Richard0612 12:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Archive

Why did u moved my archive? it is my right to choose where to put it as long as its content is available to everyone.89.32.1.82 18:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

That is not the case. It must be a subpage off of your userspace. --Yamla 18:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

IRC

How can a person get on IRC? I am too stupid to figure it out... GangstaEB help me improve! 20:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

You need an IRC client. The choice is varied, depending on your configuration. If you're using Firefox, then probably a best start would be to install the ChatZilla extension. You should be able to find some instructions (how to configure it, connect) on its website. A good tutorial site on IRC in general is available at http://www.irchelp.org Misza13 ^{T C} 21:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Just a quick thankyou for noticing that vandalism to my userpage. --ais523 11:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Just a quick you'rewelcome. :) Misza13 ^{T C} 15:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

AIV

Just a reminder - don't forget to remove an AIV listing after blocking. Thanks --Jay(Reply) 16:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually I have no idea which block you're talking about, but I didn't get to it via AIV. I'm working with pgkbot today. But I'll check it more often then. Cheers! Misza13 ^{T C} 16:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

My mistake then. It must have been a user who listed it not knowing you were on it already. --Jay(Reply) 16:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for help against vandals on Dead Rising Travb (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

You missed some vandalism, before it was protected: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dead_Rising&diff=67274492&oldid=67274360 Travb (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually it's only semi-protected - cleaning up should be easier now, but keep an eye on it. Misza13 ^{T C} 17:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. We will see what happens.... Travb (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Teh videogamer!

Please watch, as I expect you'll want to indefblock him as well. - CobaltBlueTony 17:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Greetings, Misza13. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Kylu for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here.

If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)

Ian Mannus

You will probably want to block 81.156.60.67 as well... vandal is editing from IP now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Isotope23 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 August 2006.

Thanks :)

Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism to my userpage. Fabricationary 21:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Moving Temporary Subpage

Hello, how are you? Would you please move the temporary subpage Talk:Fasy/Temp to Fasy, replacing the copyvio tag? Nobody seems to be objecting to Fasy's copyright status. Thank you! --Gray Porpoise 14:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Done. You're welcome. Misza13 ^{T C} 17:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks again. --Gray Porpoise 02:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

template migration

Since you decided to keep the template, will you move it out of the template name space?--JWSchmidt 23:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't think germanizing the template has anything to do with closing it's TfD discussion. All you need is a user willing to adopt it and someone to substitute all instances with the userfied version. Then you can notify me and I'll delete the unused {{User System Administrator}}. Misza13 ^{T C} 10:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi

I noticed you're an admin, and you're currently online. Could you help me move User:Chacor/Sandbox/Ewiniar 0603 to Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) over the redirect that is currently at the target article? (A move of the talk page is not required) Thank you! Chacor 10:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Done. I didn't touch the talk pages - if there's any info you want to salvage, you can just copy it yourself. Also, let me know if you want your "workshop" (now a redirect to the article) or it's talk deleted. Misza13 ^{T C} 10:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you re: Bobby Boulders Vandalism

Hey there! Thanks for your recent help combatting Bobby Boulders and his various sockpuppets. Watchful admins are always a welcome sight whenever he's around. For future reference, though, we at the CVU are currently attempting to catalogue all of Bobby's various sockpuppets as they appear. If you could be so kind as to tag his sockpuppets' user pages with the "BB" or "Bobby" tags from now on, that would be great. Thanks again! Dr Chatterjee 17:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Will do. My monobook auto-tagging script is getting overloaded with all those tags, though. Misza13 ^{T C} 20:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstarage

		The Original Barnstar
		I, JD, offer you, Misza13, this barnstar for using the correct terminology when referring to the television show Big Bogan. JD don't talk email me 20:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Misza13, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.

Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 08:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Toolserveraccount

Thanks :D -- Where 16:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Template work etc. from IRC

		The Minor Barnstar
		For quickly fixing {{wsproj}}, it's quite helpful! The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 17:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Misza13 ^{T C} 17:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Newsletter spammage

Hey there, Misza13! Are you still willing to use MiszaBot to send the Esperanza newsletter to all the Esperanzians? That would be most lovely; there should be a newsletter in the next day or two, and I wanted to check and see if you could still take of sending it out. Many thanks! -- Natalya 15:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure. Just signal me (via IRC would be best, if you catch me this evening) that's it's ready, where is it (like, User:Natalya/Sandbox) and what's the ==message header==. I'll take care of the rest. If not today then tommorow. Misza13 ^{T C} 18:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks! I'll let you know when it's ready. -- Natalya 00:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

One more question: we'd like to partially implement the opt-out list for the newsletter, so that if people don't want to recieve the entire newsletter, they can receive a link to it. Where is the most convinient location for you for us to have this list? Is there any particular way to format this list to make it easy for you? Thanks again, -- Natalya 02:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Makes no great difference to me. I'm using programs to parse the lists anyway, so I can adapt to whatever format you choose. Put it on whatever page you want, one user per line, be it with {{user}}, plain [[brackets]], whatever. It is the software that should adapt to our needs, not the other way round. :) Misza13 ^{T C} 10:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Great, thanks so much! :) The newsletter is ready to go out, it's located at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter (also at User:Natalya/Draft if you need it in the userspace). The message header can be "August Esperanza Newsletter".

For the future, the opt-out list (currently empty, so not applying to this newsletter) is located at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List. Everyone there will just get a link to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter instead.

Thanks again! Your help is much appreciated. -- Natalya 15:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Everything looks lovely. -- Natalya 22:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Status Switcher

Hi. I just would like to say great job on your user page! I was your Esperanza User Page award. Anyway, when I saw your page, I came across your Status switcher script. I tried using it on my page (sorry for not telling you), and it didn't work somehow. Can you help me? The pages I was instructed to create are here:

• User:Leroyencyclopediabrown/monobook.js
• User:Leroyencyclopediabrown/Status
• User:Leroyencyclopediabrown/StatusTemplate

--Ed^{talk c E} 21:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't have to be sorry - that's why I created it. :) And thanks for chosing my page. Anyway, to figure out why doesn't it work, I'll need more info. Specifically, let's start with this: do the status links show up? These should be 3 links named "in", "busy" and "out" that show up in the upper right corner of the screen (besides the "log out" link). Misza13 ^{T C} 21:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

No additional links show up, and everything I did is in the three links above. Do the pages look right?--Ed^{talk c E} 21:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I think I got it. You forgot to add the addlilink() function to your .js. Being an admin, I have taken the liberty to invade your monobook and fix that myself. Try purging your cache and see if it works. Misza13 ^{T C} 22:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Here, take this:

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		In recognition of his excellent contributions on making scripts and tools, I award this da Vinci Barnstar to Misza13. Edtalk c E 22:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! 2 rewards in one day, wow! :) Plus, I like the Vitruvian Barnstar image so much, I was hoping to receive one for quite a while. :-þ Thanks again and you're welcome! Misza13 ^{T C} 22:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Please fix your newsletter spamming system

It doesn't make much sense to deliver the newsletter to indefinitely banned users. --Cyde Weys 03:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Good point. However, the list I base the spam on is WP:ESP/M - if it's not up-to-date, it's not really my fault. And neither is Karmafist categorized as banned, so I can't even cross-check the list with anything. And going through it item by item manually would beat the whole point of using a bot, now wouldn't it? Any other ideas? Misza13 ^{T C} 17:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

WdefconBot

WdefconBot added a bunch of gibberish to the the Wdefcon template. Could it be a bug, or maybe someone on IRC made a mistake?--1568 03:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

It's a bug in my old IRC bot framework which sometimes causes lines received from the server to glue up. Given the bot's low activity, it's also an extremely rare one. An extra reading buffer should fix it... Misza13 ^{T C} 17:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Greetings, Misza13. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Buchanan-Hermit for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here.

If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 16:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page awhile ago. --  Netsnipe  ^(Talk)  06:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Template:User wikipedia/VCN

Just to give you headups. No more userboxes on main space. Please gusify it moving it to your userspace. I'll be removing it soon. -- Drini 22:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought Wikipedia-related boxen were exempt from it. Oh well, since I'm not the original author (I just made the .svg image), you should rather keep bugging Netsnipe about it. Misza13 06:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Dear Admin

Other Admins: Please do not delete this message until the admin whose talk page it's on has seen it. Admin: please sign your name on my talk page once you have seen it.

Dear Admin,

I am a sockpuppet of user:Crisspy. I will agree to stop vandalising wikipedia under any new accounts, on the conditions of:

• You put user:Crisspy and user:1028 on a long term abuse page.
• You do not give away the physical location and/or IP adress of either of these accounts.
• You distinguish that user:1028 and user:Crisspy were different people vandalising together.
• You do not make any records of this message and you delete it as soon as possible.

If you do this, I will agree to stop vandalising as I have said before. If I do, you may block me indefinitely.

Consider yourself warned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DJ Soupy (talk • contribs) 18:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC).

Blocked My Usage

Dear Misza13: I have been blocked from editing my page by your e-mail address because it says I sent you an e-mail but I did not. Please advise. How do I fix this? Angikay2 19:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

This is the message I get

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.

You were blocked by Misza13 for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "DCC SEND HELLOANDWELCOMETOLOLTOW„ 0 0 0". The reason given for DCC SEND HELLOANDWELCOMETOLOLTOW„ 0 0 0's block is Your IP address is 205.188.116.200.

You are not blocked from reading pages, only from editing them. If you were only intending to read a page and are seeing this message, you probably followed a red link. These are links to pages that do not exist, so they take users to an editing screen. You should have no problem if you follow only blue links.

If you would like to know when the block will expire, please search for your name or IP on the block list.

If the reason given is "username", "user...", or "contact an administrator for verification purposes", then you or someone with whom you share an IP address has most likely been blocked for choosing an inappropriate or suspicious username. Please read our username policy for more information. If you do not feel that the name is inappropriate, or if the name was registered by somebody other than yourself, please contact the blocking administrator, as described below.

Angikay2 19:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award

Misza13, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.

Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 15:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Revert on my userpage

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Much appreciated (as was the block on the offender), Gwernol 18:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. :-) Misza13 18:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

User:I took a Poop

Hi. Is there any reason to create a userpage and tag a nil-edit blocked account? The block logs shows the block - the name is obviously going to be blocked. In this case it seems pointless (although harmless) but stuff like this is encouraging people to tag nil-edit accounts with speculative tags categorizing by who might be creating it - and that justs to glorify the vandal. My ethos is block and forget - as the only way we'll drive these people away is to bore them by ignoring them. Just some thoughts... --Doc 22:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

It's just that this tagging is a long tradition on Wikipedia. I my early days as an admin I was even poked when I didn't do so; thus I figured out there's a general consensus for this practice. But since you point it out, I'll give it a thought. Misza13 22:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

It's good to tag a user with edits (especially if some are good)- in case someone follows an edit looking for the user. But the whole criminology ethos of taging and categorising vandals is increasingly being seen by experienced admins as at best useless and probably counter-productive. We've even had some users going around taging things just to up their edi count (groan). Anyway thanks for thinking. --Doc 22:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Imposter

Thanks for the block! -- Samir धर्म 00:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Cookie

		Administrative cookie
		I, Ryūlóng, give you this cookie, Misza13, for your efforts in clearing the backlog at WP:AIV. Ryūlóng 19:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for your help with the 'references' tag at Mills Mess. I really appreciate such a quick response. Let me know if you have some particularly onerous chore in the future, I'd love the opportunity to return the favor. User:Pedant 22:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

WDefcon

It'd probably be best if it had no default. The default bit is just a convienence. Some people apparently think this is a userbox, when itself is not. Kevin_b_er 19:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The default one doesn't look like a userbox at all to me. But anyway, what do you propose? A blank one? Misza13 19:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually. A better idea would be that the template not transclude unless a parameter is given. Since some may, I suppose, use the default one like a userbox. Personally I just glance at it on my watchlist to see if stupid stuff has happened (like some nutjob using aol proxy servers) that I know is likely not fully cleaned up. But since {{wdefcon}} could be used like a userbox, we could at least prevent that. If people want to make a userbox out of it(as a few have by putting it into a tiny box), they can use userpages to do it. Kevin_b_er 19:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Winner!

Congratulations Misza13! It is our honor to inform you that you've won Esperanza's Best User Page Award! Here's a token for your efforts. Petros471 Daniel.Bryant james(talk) Thε Halo Θ Natalya Celestianpower háblame Terence Ong (T | C) Wikiwoohoo

If you wish, you may use this as a barnstar to decorate your page: . Congrats :) Petros471 22:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Chris Frail (talk · contribs)

After reviewing this user's contribs, I feel I should ask before I override your block and indef as a vandal-only account. Thoughts? :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 01:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Wups, my mistake, your block was on 30 August. I can read... ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 01:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

A bit of fraud detected

How have you been? Hope adminship has been treating you well :) Let me know if you have any articles you want help with.

I wanted to let you know that someone, right before Palpatine became featured, [[12]] blanked their bid from the bounty board, and this may have been because it was very near succeeding. I was wondering if there was an administrative thing that could be done about this. All the best! Judgesurreal777 03:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello. I'm very fine, thanks. Not much can be done really, at least in my opinion. The Bounty board is an informal thing, so it's really a question of ethics. I guess you could query Marudubshinki directly. Misza13 17:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Named template parameters

No, my changes were borne out of a simple discovery that not naming the template parameters got me the same results and not out of any expertise wrt template attributes. I personally don't care for the font colouration within a template like this, but I'll self-revert given your information. --Deathphoenix ʕ 18:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Grrr, beaten to a run of reverts and blocks again...

➨ ЯEDVERS awards this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar to Misza13 for being far too quick at anti-vandalism work, leaving the rest of us gasping for breath in his dusty wake. Thanks!

Thanks too! I feed on vandals in freenode's #vandalism-en-* channels. I don't recall meeting you there - where are your hunting grounds? ;-) Misza13 19:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

• I can be found there on the odd occasion, but general just hang about with the manual tools... I'm a bit old-fashioned! :o) I still usually beat people to the punch: but not tonight, as you're clearly on fire! So far you've been ahead of me on 9 out of every 10 vandal-hunts. Hence the barnstar! I think I'll quit whilst I'm behind, as I'm on holiday for a week or so from tomorrow and need my beauty sleep tonight. Still: sir, I salute you! :o) Cheers ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Status Changer

Err... Yeah I'm having some problems getting the status changer to work. I did everything the page said. Can you help me? (and if you ask to edit/create new pages, the answer is yes as long as you don't vandalize) Thanks in advance, ҈Đǣţĥ ɱøťőŕ ☎ 23:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I tried it myself and it seems to work. Did the said buttons (in/busy/out) appear to the left of the "log out" button (upper right corner of the screen)? If not, you might need to bypass your browser's cache. If yes, what happens when you click one? Misza13 07:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I fixed it and it shows the 3 extra links, but when I click on them, it replaces the text after the | with nothing, rendering it blank. I tried this for all the links and they all produced the same result.--҈Đǣţĥ ɱøťőŕ ☎ 14:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

A very strange behavior. What does the address bar read after clicking one of the 3 links? And does it click the "Save" button automatically? Finally, what browser are you using? Misza13 18:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

First and foremost, it says http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Death motor/Status&action=edit&newstatus=in in the address bar. Second, it does click the save button automatically. Third, I am using the new IE7 RC1 administered by Microsoft to all Windows XP users.

status changer

Hi, I have a question and a compliment. Compliment first: I love your userpage. I actually am using the code as the basis for my own page! I'm still working on it, so it still looks a bit like yours, but I wanted to say how great it is! Okay, question. I am using your status changer script. It works great, but I'd like to add on some more status options. How do I do that? I tried just going in and adding it to my monobook but it didn't seem to work. If you could help me out with that, I would greatly appreciate it! Laurən^whisper 18:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'm flattered. :-) I've put some great effort to make my userpage stylish and functional (which was eventually rewarded by Esperanza's UserPage Award) and am happy that you like it. As of the status switcher, this shouldn't be too hard. I see your template has an extra option already. All you need is add this to your monobook:

addlilink(contribs, linkprefix+user+subpage+"&action=edit&newstatus=sleepy", "Sleepy", "pt-status-sleepy", "I'm sleepy", "");

this goes inside the // STATUS CHANGER function, together with other lines beginning with "addlilink". Misza13 19:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza newsletter

Hey Misza, it's that time again!  :) When you get a chance, could you have MiszaBot spam out the Esperanza newsletter? Thank you so much for being able to take care of this. The newsletter can be found at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter, as well as User:Natalya/Draft. The title of the post can simply be "September Esperanza Newsletter". And for everyone who is on the newsletter Opt Out list, if they could just get spammed with "For your reading pleasure, the new Esperanza newsletter can be found at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter." or something similar, that would be awesome. Many thanks again! -- Natalya 11:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay. Will do, but tommorow. I'm just back from a two-day trip and an too tired to write the program that would prepare the userlists, cross-check them with the opt-out etc. Misza13 19:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

No worries, and many thanks for whenever you get time to do it. I hope you had a lovely trip. :) -- Natalya 22:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Mission complete, ma'am! :-) Misza13 19:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again, Misza! -- Natalya 11:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza Newsletter

Hi. I was just wondering which version of the Esperanza newsletter you sent out...? To me it looks like a mix between these two versions, but I don't understand how the final draft didn't get sent out (which was previously copy-edited for spelling and grammar). It may be just me getting confused though. Thanks :) — FireFox ^(talk) _{19:24, 20 September 2006}

As Natalya pointed out in a thread right above, these two were supposed to be identical, so I'm sending out the Wikipedia: one. Oh, well... I'm just tech support here, sir. ;-) Misza13 19:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

=) Fair enough. Nobody should notice anyway ;) — FireFox ^(talk) _{19:28, 20 September 2006}

Experanzian

Hi, I'm no longer an ESP member and have no interest in the newsletter. Please remove me from your bot's mailing list. Thanks--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 19:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

There is no such list, actually. The bot is spamming along the member list located on WP:ESP/M. Please update your membership status and you won't receive one again. Misza13 19:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Done that for you. Misza13 20:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Status changer bug..

Hi - it may not be a bug in the status changer, but more likely in IE7 (in Vista), which means that it doesn't work (replaces "in" or whatever with nothing (same as problem above)). You probably already knew, but I thought I'd say anyways :) Martinp23 19:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, I just started to figure this has something to do with the evil M$ product. Having no copy of it, I can't work out the problem otherwise than make up a wholly different solution, keeping in mind that regular expressions in IE JavaScript are screwed. :-/ Misza13 20:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza Newsletter

I placed myself in the Opt-out list, and still got the newsletter, ? —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  21:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Simple reason - on the members' list, you are still listed as CliffHarris. There is no CliffHarris on the opt-out list, so CliffHarris was marked as "to be spammed with full version". Then the bot simply got redirected to User talk:Springeragh. To work this out, I suggest that you update your entry on WP:ESP/M and note CliffHarris as being your former account instead of the other way round as it is now. Cheers, Misza13 17:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Bot to notify about userboxes & category wp by language

Hi,

The oldest page on the merge list, I believe, is Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language, mainly because it would be a brace of bears to merge it with Category:Wikipedians by language. The former seems to require Wikipedians to manually enter their names according to language/proficiency; the latter is autogenerated by placing a relevant language userbox on one's user page.

The first page really needs to be deleted, since merger to an automated page is impossible. It has not yet even been AfD'd, tho.

Is there a bot that would:

1. Read the usernames on the page Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language.
2. Look on the associated user page for any language template userboxes. If they know of the existence of one, they know of them all, so no need to cross-verify whether the box they have is the language they manually listed on the above page.
3. If has a language userbox, skip this user.
4. If no language userbox, then pop a tiny little message on the user's talk page saying, hey, we're gonna delete Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language, you can get a language userbox, and get listed automagically on Category:Wikipedians by language.
5. Be sure not to put multiple messages on the same user's talk page. Some people are listed multiple times on Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language.

If the bot worked, then we could AfD Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language.

Thanks --Ling.Nut 06:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

As fas as I know, no such bot exists as of now. I guess I could develop one, but then I'm pretty low on free time lately. I'll give it a thought this weekend though. :) Cheers, Misza13 17:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for dropping by. That is a sign of a responsible administrator :-) --HappyCamper 18:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I, Shardsofmetal, offer you this barnstar for your Status switcher user script. This script saves me time updating my status, which allows me to spend more time improving Wikipedia. Shardsofmetal [ Talk • Contribs ] 03:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked - not me. System Failure!!

I have been blocked and it is not me. My user name is Wahiba and I have had nothing to do with an article "I am a negro".

There is a fault in the system that needs sorting.

I only post practical articles where everything, including pictures, is of my own creation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahiba (talk • contribs) 12:21, 25 September 2006

User:I am a negro is an account I have blocked. You must've shared his IP, hence the autoblock. I'd also appreciate if you signed your messages with ~~~~ - I don't fancy going through my page's history to see who left the message. Thank you. Misza13 16:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked - off the hook

Wahiba here - seems it is an AOL problem. Getting in through Mozilla solved it.

Not sure what everyone has against AOL, it always works fine for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahiba (talk • contribs) 12:27, 25 September 200

As I understand, the problem is now sorted out? Misza13 16:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The hacker (talk · contribs)

this is user:Adam34- user:the Hacker under the same IPaddress as me has been taken care of. expect no further problems, but please refer any new reports of vandalism to my discussion page, as you blocking them, also blocks me, being a member of the Counter-Vandalism unit. Please wtite back asap on my talk page.

Adam34, 20:04, 4 October 2006

The hacker (talk · contribs)

this is user:Adam34- user:the Hacker under the same IPaddress as me has been taken care of. expect no further problems, but please refer any new reports of vandalism to my discussion page, as you blocking them, also blocks me, being a member of the Counter-Vandalism unit. Please wtite back asap on my talk page.

Adam34, 20:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Good work

Here is the Vandal Stopper award, this award goes to the few who protect WIkipedia with great edits and stopping Vandals at the same time, Keep it up if Wikipedia did not have users like you who destroy vandalism, Wikipedia would be destoyed--Seadog

Thanks! :-) —Misza13 17:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks for fixing my userpage

Hi there, and thanks for fixing my userpage! I'll let Sango123 know (I had originally asked her help, but it's no longer needed). Thanks again! --Kyoko 20:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I just saw your comment on my watchlist (didn't even look at Sango's talkpage - just from the summary) and thought I'd take a look. :-) Misza13 21:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks

I hope your contribution holds its own. :) Ansell 10:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

So do I - it is sad that people are rather arguing/warring over one or the other version instead of thinking up something in-between, in the spirit of consensus. Misza13 10:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for unblocking me. The auto-blocker pretty much hates me. I swear, every time I come one, it's back on me. Well anyway, thanks a bunch! Infolithium 21:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, thanks for:

1. Banning that vandal
2. Correcting all the typos on User:Martinp23/AfC Closer

Thanks :) Martinp23 19:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Being a Linux user I couldn't really use it, so that's about a much as I could do. :-) Misza13 19:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Spaingy

Thanking you. Spaingy 22:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Okay, cheers - I'll bear that in mind :D SergeantBolt (t,c) 10:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

My talk page

Nope, I don't mind :D Thanks for helping me out with my talk page. SergeantBolt (t,c) 14:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for your wishes on my birthday, Misza! I really appreciate it :) --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 06:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Why did u delete my article?

Why did u delete my article? None of the website i got it from is copyrighted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Signor X (talk • contribs) 19:47, 22 October 2006.

The fact that they don't say anything about copyright doesn't equal a lack of it. Please paraphrase it creatively instead of copy-pasting POV statements such as "thriving village full of innovation and creativity". Also, please sign your messages using four tildes (~~~~). Misza13 19:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:UW

Hi Misza,

I see looking at the WikiProject user warnings page, that you have recently become a participant in this project. To bring you up to speed, I have recently started an undertaking to harmonise all user page warnings and templates. For this I would like your assistance. I have listed a number of ideas on the project template page here as a first draft. I fully appreciate that as with most editors and admins, that you are fairly busy. Therefore I am not looking for anyone to carry out the actual work, I am willing to do that myself, with help from a number of other RC Patrollers who have come forward. But what I am looking for is your invaluable input, on the draft ideas and also to suggest other ways you believe we may improve the templates. I do however require the services of a couple of administrators to put into effect some of the new templates, as they are currently protected. Please take 5 mins to look through the new templates page, and both the project and templates talk pages and leave any ideas or suggestions that you may have. Best regards Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 10:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Today's featured article

Just wanted to let you know a featured article you worked on, 0.999..., was featured today on the Main Page. Tobacman 00:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Jacknicholson

Can he be blocked for longer for blanking warnings on his talk page while being blocked? (wow, quite a sentence there). yandman 16:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Good work. I was going to do just the same and list it on WP:PP. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 16:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Extended to 2 weeks. But should probably be indef with {{usernameblock}}... Misza13 16:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright

I'm still thankful to you for replacing the copyvio Fasy with the new version. Would you please do this procedure again? Cloak of invisibility has been sitting with a copyright violation tag since October 19. I have written a new version at Talk:Cloak of invisibility/Temp. Please delete the current version and replace it with the temporary page's current content. Thank you! --Gray Porpoise^{Phocoenidae, not Delphinidae} 14:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Done. :) Misza13 15:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again! --Gray Porpoise^{Phocoenidae, not Delphinidae} 19:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Edit summaries in pywikipedia

Fixed. Thanks! -- Where 00:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Esperenza newsletter

I didn't notice anywhere else to post this and since your the owner of the bot I thought it best to post here. Anyway I noticed your bot is posting to this userpage User talk:Carbine. The user has been indefinitely blocked so I'm not sure whether that's necessary or a good idea (although I don't have strong feelings either way) Nil Einne 22:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

If Carbine got the newsletter, it means he was listed on WP:ESP/M under active/semi-active members. Since he's not there now, I figure he was removed since the spamming. All that it takes is just keeping the member list up-to-date. Cheers, Misza13 17:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

New message! (omg)

Luna Santin has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Newsletter spammage

Hey Misza, I hope all is well. When you get a chance, could you have MiszaBot spam out the Esperanza newsletter? It's been updated to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter, and the title of the post can be "November Esperanza Newsletter". And for those listed at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List, they just need a link to it (The November Esperanza Newsletter has been updated! Read all about it at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter), or something along those lines. Many thanks, it's much appreciated that you can do this. -- Natalya 19:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. Not without trouble (see global notice - someone changed the header titles on WP:ESP/M), but no serious blunders this time it seems. :) Cheers, Misza13 21:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

That's odd, thanks for pointing out he change. And thanks for getting it done so quickly! I wish there was a better way to thank you than by just saying "thanks", but I hope you catch the drift. :) -- Natalya 03:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

MiszaBot

Hi, I just noticed that your bot automatically sending wikipedian(who involved with Esperanza) the Esperanza Messages. Is your bot only sending messages for Esperanza News Letter? I'm very curious about that. But, Please respond in my talk pages. Best Regard. Daniel5127 (Talk) 20:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza newsletter

Hi Misza. I was just wondering why whenever the Esperanza Newsletter is sent out, why don't you just send it out in template format instead of sending people out the confusing codes on thier talk page. And instead erasing the past newsletter from Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter, why not archive it on a sub-page for later viewing if nessecary? semper fi — Moe 01:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I believe the Newsletter issues have been extensively discussed on WT:ESP in the past and this form was adopted. You're however welcome to propose new ideas there (rather than here - I merely execute the Council's will). Misza13 18:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Indiana University Kokomo

Hi. Clicking on the subject line above will show you what the problem is. It looks like you moved this article to revert some stupid vandalism the other day, but in the process you accidentally removed all the content. Hopefully it can be undeleted and restored. --Russ (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, such strange things seem to happen when reverting moves and being an administrator - the interface automatically proposes the target's deletion and error may result in deletion of the wrong page. I see that someone fixed that however. Misza13 18:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

you are user:Betacommand stock?

plese stop block bot...--Waxwax 07:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't understand you. Betacommand (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights) is an entirely different user - perhaps you should discuss it with him? Misza13 18:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Bad Misza!

Thanks

Thanks for the revert to my userpage :) Take care! riana_dzasta 14:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Thanks for the birthday greeting. Did you notice the cloak christel gave me? :D —Xyrael / 09:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, you're right about the watchlist. Excuse me if I miss yours; I don't have time to *check* my list. —Xyrael / 14:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Survey Q

Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere? Respond here Deadline for entries is December 15th, PST. AstroBoy 03:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. It is much appreciated. Keep up the great work! Chris Kreider 20:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Ummmmm, just need to confirm something....

I didn't know I was in Esperanza, still don't know that I am. But for some reason I received the Esperanza newsletter for November. If I am in Esperanza, I'd just like to be sure. Thanks! (hope it wasn't out of place to ask) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elfred (talk • contribs) 23:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC).

Yes, my bad. It seems that my bot for some reason didn't recognize and ommit the "Users who don't meet the requirements yet" secion of WP:ESP/M. Sorry. Misza13 16:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Ahem

In the future, if you are going to delete something, could you at least have the courtesy to leave a note on the person's talk page if they are an editor in good standing? You deleted {{Template:Sarcasm}}, which is your prerogative, but unfortunately I created it for a reason after being accused of bad faith. I do not plan to create on my userpages (I see that as trying to get around a delete) but I fail to see why you claim it is divisive or was created to make a point, and I fail to see why you could not have informed me of your action. --Elaragirl ||||||^Talk|Count 01:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Noted. Will do. Misza13 18:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. smile --Elaragirl ||||||^Talk|Count 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The Vandalism Box

How did you do that? Are you a programmer or something? Bearly541 05:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I am a "programmer or something". :) But it was actually Gurch's idea to put that on a userpage - the whole "trick" is {{Special:Recentchanges/1}} (you may substitute "1" for another number to display more items) and the colorful boxes are just some formatting stuff. You can see the full code at User:Misza13/Global Header. Misza13 09:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Cool. I always wanted to program a bot. Named Bearly541's bot, "or something." :-) Is it mainly C++? Bearly541 10:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

It's not a bot. You just put the code on you userpage/wherever and it shows just like that. It's just some WikiSyntax. Misza13 12:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

User talk:PleaseBlockMeNow

Err - he spammed everyone asking to be blocked. That username has no non-vandalistic contributions. Why have you unblocked? Secretlondon 19:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

For the very same reason he has requested the unblock. To request changing his username. If he follows the path of disruption, any admin has the full authority to reblock and deny any further requests. Misza13 19:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

But he can just make a new username - going through the change username procedure for an account with 10 edits, all vandalism, is a waste of a a bureaucrats time. As a bureaucrat I wouldn't touch it, sorry. Secretlondon 19:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

If you look at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats one of our criteria is "has no history of abuse". We don't rename vandals. Secretlondon 19:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I understand, but what is the purpose of the {{unblock-un}} template at all, then? Misza13 19:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't know - maybe to avoid biting newbies who have no edits but have banned for having a name with WoW in? Secretlondon 19:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Can you please take a look?

Can you please take a look at Special:Contributions/GiorgioOrsini and this article's history.

Also he keeps removing warning's and pleads made to him on his talk page. Thank you in advance. --Factanista 22:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: List of Croatians

Thanks for your kind note. If you thinks so - there will be no solution. I provided the facts confirming that a number of names of prominent Italians is 'translated' into Croatian and listed there. That way the integrity and credibility of Wikipedia is gravely undermined. I'll stop what you called 'edit war' and advise you to get valid information about people listed there. Moreover, the French actress Brigitte Bardot is listed as a Croatian. It is laughable to read that article. This time you are actually helping these 'editors' whose 'expertise' is to 'naturalize' foreign names.--GiorgioOrsini 02:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Unblocks

Oh, I've had much better denials than that! Still, I genuinely appreciate your 'star for it! Thanks, mate! :o) ➨ ЯEDVERS 21:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Anon vandal on Rod Blagojevich and Barack Obama

Hey I'm no fan of politics in Illinois, but I don't go around spreading lies and blanking articles - thanks for the timely block - we'd revert one and they'd go back and start vandalizing the other all over again. Much appreciated! --JohnDBuell 22:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks

With regards to your comments on User talk:Gurch: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. – Gurch 18:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

strange comments...

Hey there,

I noticed you protected User talk:M4URIZ. Before doing so the banned user has entered several comments on me. I have never had any issue with the user, if he is right on not being a suckpuppet. Could I kindly ask you to remove these comments - or maybe delete the entire page of the banned user. Bertilvidet 09:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I didn't see the comments as offensive in any way, but I figure you find them uneasy... So, I have practically blanked the page and added it to CAT:TEMP, which means the record will be deleted after a reasonable amount of time. Misza13 10:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. No, the comments were not offensive as such. But I find it disturbing that a user bothers to find out personal information about me and post it on their talk page - especially when it seems to be a suckpuppet of a user who has a long history of engaging in rude and obscene personal attacks. Bertilvidet 11:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

For you :)

		Glen's Anti-Vandalism Barnstar!
		Glen is thrilled to award Misza13 with this small token of appreciation and acknowledgement for exceptional performance in the art of troll extermination, cruft elimination and for ensuring Wikipedia is safe for public consumption.. And, smile!! You are a legend, please keep up the great work!  Glen  21:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

User:GiorgoOrsini again

Despite your warning he keeps vandalizing the article List of Croatians. He also now started reverting and removing content from article Giovanni Lupis, Benedetto Cotrugli and has also removed the tag from Travunia which makes me suspect that he now follows me around. --Factanista 10:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of School Spectacular Orchestra

Hi, that article was meant to be a link from another page, I understand that it probably shouldn't be an article, but is there anyway to create sub-pages in an article? for instance, i want to list the members of the orchestra but dont think it should be on the front page of the article as it would cause too much clutter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.215.7.43 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC).

Hi

Can you userfy Amr ibn Jamooh so i can fix it? Thanks. --Striver 23:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Recreated on User:Striver/Amr ibn Jamooh. Good luck working on it. Misza13 20:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. --Striver 02:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

User talk page deletion

Why did you delete Tsutsu's user talk page? A user talk page not being edited for a month is no reason to remove someone's talk page. What does "Temporary Wikipedian" mean? Why do you think he is only a Temporary Wikipedian? Angela. 09:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please see CAT:TEMP. It is a category filled mostly with usernames that violate WP:USERNAME and are blocked indefinitely - templates such as {{UsernameBlocked}} and {{indefblockeduser}} automatically put pages in this category. Such pages are not of any use to Wikipedia. Also, as far as I know, such pages are also indexed by Google (which is bad, I think - we wouldn't want such pages to turn up in searches) and deleting them prevents the search engine from doing so. Oh, and it's not "pages belonging to temporary Wikipedians", but rather "Wikipedians' temporary pages". Misza13 13:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

See here bud, for my somewhat goofball circular logic :)  Glen  13:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

You blocked my ip range at school

yea, you blocked our whole system ( about 60 computers) from editing posts that have typo's or rude coments. I feel that it is unfair that you block 500 good students from ones stupid actions, also, this stops my own private account from editing.

thank you,

dave (D.Doer)

19:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

First, I have no idea what IP range are you talking about. Second, I can't find any autoblocks in my log, which is not at all surprising, because all standard IP blocks I give are anonymous only and thus allow for registered users to edit via the IPs. Could you be more specific? Misza13 19:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Prasi90

Hello, I was looking through your talk page for the request that you delete the user pages for Prasi90. I can't find that specific request. Could you direct me to it? Thanks. Regards, Hamster Sandwich 20:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The user made the request by putting speedy deletion tags on both the userpage and talkpage. This qualifies under speedy deletion criterion U1 and upon examination, I didn't find any "administrative need to retain the pages". Misza13 20:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

IRC bot

I went to your userpage and clicked on Bob the Barman. Is your IRC bot now WineSteward? I'm very confused.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 21:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

No. Bob_the_Barman is inactive at the moment (they take turns with WineSteward, who is xyr's bot). Misza13 10:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 16:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)