User talk:Misodoctakleidist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't add false information to Wikipedia articles, especially not biographies of living people. The Times article you linked to discusses a Michael Dillon who is (a) a medical doctor rather than a professor of politics, and (b) dead since 1962. —Celithemis 06:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Bono 2 Tendentious editing 3 Inapproprate Editing 4 Warnings 4.1 April 2008 5 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Msurj cover page 0708.PNG)

[edit] Bono

While wikipedia is not censured, your heading here [1] is completely inappropirate and doesn't help the project. It doesn't help your point at all, in fact people are less likely to take you seriously. Thus, for your own benefit maybe reconsider your approach. Furthermore, if you believe this is notable and reliable sources for your point are indeed easily avaible, please find them. Merbabu 15:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tendentious editing

You've been making tendentious and unconstructive edits for some time -- most recently this one. You've mostly flown under the radar until now, but be aware that edits like these will get you blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. Wikipedia is not a soapbox; if you want to express your personal opinions of postmodernism, please start a blog instead. Thank you. —Celithemis 11:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Reid, you will be blocked from editing. —Celithemis 13:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The gender-neutral usage of the term actor is fully supported. Please do not use this public wiki to express your personal linguistic likes and dislikes. Gwen Gale 05:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I am not using this public wiki to express my "personal linguistic likes and dislikes." I am attempting to remove politically charged language from an article where it is not appropriate. Just because it is a synonym, that doesn't make it appropriate or non-political. We do not use the term "death duty" to refer to inheritance tax.Misodoctakleidist 05:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inapproprate Editing

There is no rule regarding the order of comments on the discussion page. They are comments. But if you are so convinced that order matters then why are you deleting my comment rather than moving it? Cut it out or I am going to report you! Play nice. Gkochanowsky (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You are violating the talk page guidelines. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Layout. Misodoctakleidist (talk) 00:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

It's a guidline not a rule. In any case your editing is extreme. If you are convinced that it should go to the bottom then move it there. Don't delete it! Gkochanowsky (talk) 13:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I archived the talk page and moved Gkochanowsky's thread to the bottom. However, there was nothing in his posts to justify removal of the section rather than moving them to the appropriate place, let alone doing so four times like you did.[2], [3], [4], [5] Please refrain from repeating that kind of thing. In such a case, moving the section to the bottom and giving a polite notice about our Talk page guidelines is enough. |dorftrottel |talk 14:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I have provided an explanation here [6]. Misodoctakleidist (talk) 02:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

You said you were afraid of making a mess of the talk page. Well, if that's the case — in spite of the fact that it's really just the simplest three-step thing of (i) marking the text in question, (ii) pressing ctrl-x, (iii) scrolling to the bottom of the page and klicking where you want to insert the text and pressing ctrl-v — why didn't you simply ask another user for help? Also, it doesn't explain your less than civil comments. Look, I think it best if you tried to stay away from Gkochanowsky for the time being. If there is another such issue, please contact someone else for assistance (e.g. myself or J-stan). |dorftrottel |talk 13:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

[edit] April 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to TalkTalk (telecommunications company). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 16:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to ICCF numeric notation. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 18:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Msurj cover page 0708.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Msurj cover page 0708.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)