Talk:Missed approach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Aviation Portal

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated projects or task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

[edit] VfD

On May 21, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Missed approach. The result was keep. —Xezbeth 06:55, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Status

I re-incarnated this article, as it was incorrectly redirected to go-around. I see a message here that it was trans-wikied to wikitionary, but I couldn't find it there. In any case, I don't think the important subject of 'missed approach' can be squeezed into a dictionary entry; it clearly merits its own article. If someone knows more about this, please comment. I copied the Talk-archive redirect to here. Crum375 19:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Missed approach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] VfD

[edit] Status

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search