Talk:Miss Mam'selle Hepzibah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] A more appropriate picture

If no one objects, I'm going to replace the pictures. These were actually drawn by Chuck Jones, and Walt Kelly was angry he'd redrawn her fact to be more human. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 07:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Redrawn her "face". Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 07:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mamselle4.jpg

Image:Mamselle4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Hum, yes. Well. Sigh. I didn't add that image, but I did go to a little effort to add the other, existing image (and the fair use rationale) to draw a comparison between the original and what Kelly found objectionable. Should I find a link to a site that continues to violate fair usage, which seems a little contrary to the exercise?

Think what I'm going to do here is contact Kelly Studios and ask them what to do.

Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)