Wikipedia talk:Mirrors and forks/Abc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Biowiki

Biowiki is a definite mirror that should probably be contacted. all these sites are copies of wikipedia. I don't get it.

Stealthrabbit127, the RabbiN8r 00:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blogspot

Another example, probably from an unrelated blogspot user, is http://airlines-catalog.blogspot.com/2006/09/belgium-compilation-of-airlines-and.html. This opus contains text suspiciously similar to WP's SN Brussels Airlines, and may just be a concatenation of several WP articles. The page helpfully provides a list of links which show similar use of other WP articles to form a "comprehesive [sic] list of all known airlines". Certes (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Conservapedia deleted

I deleted the illiterate entry of Conservapedia on this list. The information is not only incorrect but Christophobic. Conservapedia does not state that they only want Christians. That is disingenuous. Also, the sample link of Flying Spaghetti Monster as a violation of GFDL is wrong. The article entry at Conservapedia is different enough from the Wikipedia article that there is no cause to suggest there is a violation of GFDL. Jtpaladin 23:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Christophobic? How so? The FSM article was a violation of the GFDL when this section was originally created. I re-added the section with a different example of a GFDL violation here: Al Sarant (conservapedia) vs Al Sarant (wp). ~a (user • talk • contribs) 02:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Conservapedia does violate the GFDL http://www.rationalwiki.com keeps tabs on them: here is an example. -Icewedge 16:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)