Talk:Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is part of WikiProject Pakistan which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan and Pakistan-related topics. For guidelines see WikiProject Pakistan and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Khalidkhoso 21:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

 It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Pakistan may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Deletion of Talk page

As others have said, please don't. It preserves a record of discussions, and gives other editors a background to the issues and conflicts involved. Tearlach 17:50, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tone and deletions

The tone of this article is not acceptable, but the answer is not deletion of huge blocks of text without consensus. The answer is in citing sources, and trying to be impartial. More content is good for the reader, esp. when its verifiable and neutral. Sam Spade 00:29, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. However - I'd never bothered to look this up before - the Wikipedia:Verifiability#Checking verifiability guidelines do suggest that material that is persistently unverified should be moved to Talk page, and ultimately deleted if no verification is forthcoming.

All of the following quoted section needs sourcing, or it should go. Tearlach 12:08, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

For now, it has to go. But anything can be replaced if it is very carefully and fully sourced of course -- sannse (talk)

[edit] Deleted sections, please discuss

[Text removed by sannse]

Please do not replace this without discussing with me or a Wikimedia Foundation representative. Thanks -- sannse (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)