User talk:Mipmip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Mipmip and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have not already created a account here, note that you do not have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial • How to edit a page • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Manual of Style • Be bold in editing • How to write a great article Getting your info out there Cite your sources • Neutral Point of View • Point of View • Verifiability • Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page • Where to ask a question • Help Desk • Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette • Civility • Sign your posts • Wikipedians • Conflict resolution • Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes(~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Bduke (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Since nobody has welcomed you although you been around for a while, I welcome you to Wikipedia. We need good editors on science subjects.

I noted your deletion of material from Ab initio quantum chemistry methods. Please see my reply on the talk page. I have not deleted it as I added it in the first place, but I do not agree with you. The idea that the Schaefer Group is not notable is clearly false. Pity he is sort of a creationist, though. The material has been on Wikipedia since April 2006, when it was added to computational chemistry. With a long history like that, you really should have discussed the removal of the example on the talk page before removing it. Please keep any further discussion on the article talk page, so it is in one place where everyone interested is likely to see it. Again, welcome. --Bduke (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)