User talk:Mind meal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Home
Talk
Sandboxes
Contribs
Good articles
Awards
Articles I've created












Archive 1: June 2007 – July 2007

Archive 2: July 2007 – November 2007

Archive 3: Decemer 2007 - April 2008

Contents

[edit] John Surman

Can you get one of John Surman blowing? Badagnani (talk) 03:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC) - done

And Hamiet Bluiett. Badagnani (talk) 03:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC) - done

Wow!!! Badagnani (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Wadada Leo Smith. Badagnani (talk) 03:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC) - done

George Lewis (trombonist). Badagnani (talk) 04:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC) - done

Are you using some sort of WikiProject to keep track of which jazz musicians still need photos? I think at the rate you're going, it's probably at least 60% finished (just a guess). Badagnani (talk) 04:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The smiling, non-blowing Surman was a free one but the blowing ones on Flickr are better, haha! Photos of Smith and Lewis are great; I have played with both of these guys. Badagnani (talk) 08:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

These might be hard:

Badagnani (talk) 08:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Photographer Credit on Caption

Re: [Rupert Jee]/ [Image:Rupert Gee.jpg] I would suggest that if you cannot post a picture without stroking your own ego putting your name in the caption, that you need to remove photo. Photogs are credited on the image page, this should be sufficient? Bwave (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not re-add your name to the photo caption. Despite your assertion, the CC licenses absolutely do not require the attribution be placed where the photographer requires it, simply that they are credited in the manner they request (i.e. the name or pseudonym they wish to use). Long standing consensus on Wikipedia has been to limit attribution to the image description pages except in cases of notable photographers. Shell babelfish 05:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Not my name Shell. The author's name, the one who asked it to be there. (Mind meal (talk) 06:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Village Pump - Photo attribution

Thanks for letting me know that this discussion has come up. I've posted a note in support of your proposal. Cheers - Easchiff(talk) 23:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kate Westbrook - photograph on flickr

You emailed me via flickr regarding a photograph of Kate Westbrook http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhythmaning/301771099/ . I am very happy to have this picture used by Wikipedia, and I have changed the licence to Creative Commons.

BTW Mike Westbrook used pictures from the same set on the cover of the last Village Band CD.

aka Rhythmaning PatrickHadfield (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi, Respect the Gerry Weil Picture...!

Hi, you wrote to me on my Flickr page to let u have one of my pictures, Gerry Weil Picture..!!

I just need one thing, Can you put my name (Credit) down on the picture?....

Thnks Elio Avila —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.142.157.187 (talk) 03:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppet?

I've replied to your accusation of sockpuppetry. BTW, why do you have a swastika at the top of your talk page? Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Not a swastika but rather the endless knot. (Mind meal (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Need photo

George Gruntz. Badagnani (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Cape Point WWII bunker.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Cape Point WWII bunker.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 03:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Dexter Memorial.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Dexter Memorial.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 04:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Falls Krohn Conservatory.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Falls Krohn Conservatory.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 15:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Greaters.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Greaters.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 20:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Jon Coutlangus.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Jon Coutlangus.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 21:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Mariemont Fountain.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Mariemont Fountain.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 22:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Mariemont Inn.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Mariemont Inn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [5], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 22:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Mariemont Square.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Mariemont Square.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [6], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 22:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Sammy Sosa Texas Rangers.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Sammy Sosa Texas Rangers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [7], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 02:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not the user identified as spamming. Why I have this trouble when logged in puzzles me."

Decline reason: "I'm not entirely sure what is going on, but there is not and never has been a block in your log. — Trusilver 16:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mmpubs". The reason given for Mmpubs's block is: " This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy. You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on your user talk page or emailing the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. ".

  • Decline reason:

Our tools indicate that this autoblock has been lifted already. If you still cannot edit, please wait 24 hours and try again. — Sandstein (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Need photo

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Tassajara zendo.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Tassajara zendo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [8], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 23:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


Please be more careful in the future when uploading images from Flickr. Any CC license with NC in its title is only allowed for non-commercial use; this licensing is not compatible with Wikipedia which allows commercial reuse. Shell babelfish 23:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
These are images Flickr users have changed the licenses on. Not my problem. (Mind meal (talk) 01:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC))
You could consider uploading these to Commons where a verification system exists so that you don't run in to problems with licenses getting changed later. There's no need to be rude to friendly messages by the way; there are a lot of people who don't realize the difference or don't know that commercial reuse is allowed by Wikipedia. Shell babelfish 02:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
I apologize, I wasn't trying to suggest you were careless, just trying to make sure that you were aware of that particular wrinkle in licensing. If you're already uploading to Commons and getting verification, thanks for the work :) Shell babelfish 17:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Valentin, Javier.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Valentin, Javier.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [9], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 23:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:A Song Is Born Screen Shot - Benny Goodman & Lionel Hampton.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:A Song Is Born Screen Shot - Benny Goodman & Lionel Hampton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BlueAzure (talk) 02:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You've been mentioned at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

You're welcome to join the discussion and give your opinion. I am puzzled by the report. EdJohnston (talk) 13:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rollins photo positions

Without wanting to get into edits back and forth on placing Brian McMillen's 1980 photo on Sonny Rollins, I'd think it better placed with Second sabbatical (in reality 1972 and beyond) rather than 2001 to present? AllyD (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shinto wedding picture

Hello. I was looking at the Shinto page recently, particularly at the wedding picture and noticed that it looks almost identical to one on the BBC site. The image page lists it for a particular photographer, with links to the Flickr, and notice of Creative Commons license, but these pictures seem identical and are copyrighted on the BBC page. This could all just be a misunderstanding though. Thanks for clearing this up. Sean_ODuibher (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

That makes perfect sense. I just wasn't able to find the credit on the BBC page. I wasn't trying to be some kind of rule nazi, but I figured you, of anybody, could straighten me out. Thanks. Sean_ODuibher (talk) 03:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Post-funk albums

Category:Post-funk albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Munci (talk) 13:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jazz footer

Nice work on jazz articles, but I don't think it is a good idea to put the jazz footer below biographies; strictly speaking, it's only supposed to be below articles which are contained in the template. I'm not gonna remove them, a bit of advise. Cosprings (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Little context in Category:Eric Dolphy avant-garde jazz albums

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Eric Dolphy avant-garde jazz albums, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Eric Dolphy avant-garde jazz albums is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Eric Dolphy avant-garde jazz albums, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Charlie_Byrd.PNG

An image that you uploaded, Image:Charlie_Byrd.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Ronnie_Laws.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Ronnie_Laws.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Roy_ayers.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Roy_ayers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ohio Cup #2

Mind Meal,
I'm not sure if you're aware or not, but the Reds are bringing back the Ohio Cup, with a new trophy, and MVP trophy going to the winner of the series. I'd like to turn the Ohio Cup page into a disambiguation, leading to Ohio Cup: First Incarnation or Ohio Cup: Preseason Tournament and Ohio Cup: Second Incarnation or Ohio Cup: Regular Season Tournament. Any thoughts?
Lesserm (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Arbors Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Arbors Logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Evocation of a Form Human, Lunar, Spectral.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Evocation of a Form Human, Lunar, Spectral.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BJTalk 14:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)