Minor v. Happersett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Minor v. Happersett | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued February 9, 1874 Decided March 29, 1874 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
The Court held that voting is not a privilege of citizenship. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Morrison Waite Associate Justices: Nathan Clifford, Noah Haynes Swayne, Samuel Freeman Miller, David Davis, Stephen Johnson Field, William Strong, Joseph Philo Bradley, Ward Hunt |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Waite Joined by: unanimous |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Minor v. Happersett, United States Supreme Court case appealed from the Supreme Court of Missouri concerning the Missouri law which ordained "Every male citizen of the United States shall be entitled to vote."
, was aVirginia Minor, a leader of the women's suffrage movement in Missouri, alleged that the refusal of Reese Happersett, a Missouri state registrar, to allow her to register to vote was an infringement of her civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
[edit] Decision
The Supreme Court of Missouri upheld the Missouri voting legislation saying that the limitation of suffrage to male citizens was not an infringement of Minor's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The United States Supreme Court affirmed and upheld the lower court's ruling on the basis that the Fourteenth Amendment does not add to the privileges and immunities of a citizen, and that historically "citizen" and "eligible voter" have not been synonymous. Since the United States Constitution did not proviand citizens. It rested solely on the lack of provisions within the Constitution for women's suffrage. ==
[edit] See also
- Nineteenth Amendment – Provided female citizens of the United States the right to vote.
- Women's Suffrage
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 88