User talk:Mileshispaniae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews
A tag has been placed on O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of O'Neill of the Fews
A tag has been placed on O'Neill of the Fews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The O'Neill's in Puerto Rico
It is with deep regret that I had to delete your addition The O'Neill's in Puerto Rico in the article "Iris immigration to Puerto Rico" which I wrote. The reason behind this is that Wikipedia requires that all information added to articles msut be accompanied and cited by a "reliable" "verifiable" source. If you can provide such a source, come over to my "talk page" and I will work with you on this. Cheers! Tony the Marine (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews
An editor has nominated O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Neill's of Puerto Rico / O'Neill's of the Fews and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
