User talk:Milanmm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Milanmm.

Hi, please do not delete a paragraph because you consider them a mess. Thank you! --195.56.20.99 12:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello, Milanmm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  KissL 16:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

And let me add a Wikipedia saying with respect to your most recent edits on Kingdom of Hungary: "The 'Preview' button is your friend" :) KissL 16:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trianon

You are not what? Slovak or meatpuppet? My impression was that you are Slovak because of nickname Milan, but the more important thing is why I believe that you are meatpuppet. See you last edit:

Now compare your edit, with edits of known vandal (Bardwell):

It is evident that both of you using words "imposed on Hungary", thus the only logical conclusion is that you both are a same person. PANONIAN (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

"I copied it from a previous version, because I like it better"

LOL, tell that to somebody else please. And how interesting that nickname Bardwell appeared now again claiming same thing as you. Do you think that everybody here are stupid or what? PANONIAN (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] November 2007

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
  2. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Squash Racket (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.
    In fact, you've already broken the rule.Squash Racket (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
    1. [1]
    2. [2]
    3. [3]
    4. [4]
    Dear Michigan State University student, can you count? Squash Racket (talk) 17:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Squash Racket (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I did only 2 reverts, the other edits were no reverts so I did not break any rule"

Decline reason: "Four clear reverts. — Yamla 15:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Yamla acted based on Squash Racket's claims, probably did not read the definition of 3RR. Accoding to definition I did not break the 3RR rule."

Decline reason: "See the 4 reverts you made, directly below this message. — SQLQuery me! 15:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Other user's edit:
Undoing other user's edits: