Talk:Millî Görüş
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing! |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
 |
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Millî Görüş: |
|---|---|
|
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category |
|
[edit] notability established
The topic seems notable enough for an article - this prominent (and very controversial) religous movement has had a lot of coverage from secondary sources in Europe, in particular in Germany. Among others, they have been the subject of public debate in Germany since they were put on the observation list of German Verfassungsschutz (secret service). See the German version of this article, de:Islamische Gemeinschaft Milli Görüş, for more information and sources.
In fact my impression is that some relevant aspects, in particular regarding "critical reception", are missing from the article.
I will remove the notability tag, and change other tags accordingly. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
It is an ideology. We might need to change the stub templates. His parties are the organizations (that follow this ideology). DenizTC 13:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
