Talk:Military history of Mexico

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Military history of Mexico article.

Article policies
Peer review Military history of Mexico has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

[edit] Missing topics

Great article, I just realized it is still missing some topics. For future reference these are:

  1. The Yucatan Republic and the subsequent Caste War of Yucatan (a really long conflict, 80 years or so)
  2. Ayutla Revolution, just before the Reform War.
  3. The raising in arms of Porfirio Diaz against Lerdo de Tejada's intention of reelecting himself.

I should get around to help editing this article at some point... so many things to do... *sigh* -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 02:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

And of course, the drug patrolling. I have so many things to do in real life that I can barely start on this article like I need to. I really should have had this finished a long time ago. It is a misfortune that I still have not gotten this to FA standards. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 16:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
[1] Great website. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 16:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

This would also be helpful. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article in general

I will definitely look into to this article someday to get it to FA status. Unfortunately, the original writer, Enyclopedist, seems to be currently banned from the project, meaning I am not able to collaborate with him. He general did a very good job from what I can tell. This user also has a very nice sig! (One I will probably "steal") Thanks all, OMEN 19:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)