Talk:Milford Sound
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Post office rock
I reckon this is worth including in the article. Milford's first post office was this tiny rock at the mouth of Milford Sound. A rum barrel was hung on a tree on the rock in which mail would be posted. A white flag was then raised and passing ships would stop and sift through the mail. If any were addressed to a location they were heading it would be taken along and posted.
- Would like to include this later on, as the article gets longer - currently, we are near the limit in terms of photos, before it startes getting too cluttered. MadMaxDog 09:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] External links, references
I have removed three external links to travel agent's websites. I could not see any encyclopedic content in them, and they appeared to be in the article only to promote those travel agents, thus failing the guidelines at WP:EL. The reference for the use of the sound in The Lord of the Rings would not normally pass WP:RS; isn't this information anywhere better, like a NZ newspaper or an official LOTR book/website? Mr Stephen 09:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gallery empty
I can't see any pictures in the photo gallery. Could someone fix this please? Truetyper (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- It works for me - I see four pictures there. Are picture galleries in other Wikipedia articles (e.g. Wikipedia:Picture tutorial#Photo gallery) visible to you? -- Avenue (talk) 01:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lead image caption
The caption for the first image says "Panorama of Milford Sound on a beautiful day.", recently reverted from "clear day". I want to remove the opinion as I feel it discredits the article, one of the first items people read is someone's comments on the weather. "Beautiful" is listed on peacock terms, sounding like a travel brochure. Suggested alternative is "Panorama of Milford Sound, looking northwest". If there is no dissent or better alternative in one week I plan to go ahead with this change. XLerate (talk) 01:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, although I think it would even better if we specify where it was taken - i.e. "looking northwest from ...". -- Avenue (talk) 05:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- I'd rather get consensus before making the change. Peacock is a guideline, but I feel this is a bad case that needs to be fixed - I think it is like labeling Hitlers lead image "The evil dictator", gives the reader a clear message about the credibility of the rest of the article. Looking at featured articles for geography, I don't see any photos similiarly labelled - take a look at Yosemite National Park or The Catlins for example. People can see in the photo the kind of day it is, not necessary to have the opinion.
-
-
-
-
- Oh please, invoking Godwin's law ALREADY? I said I would not revert it again, so go ahead. I just feel that it is way too minor an issue to merit using the rule on it. Ingolfson (talk) 04:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-