Talk:Milenko Stefanović
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Milenko Stefanović is part of the WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
|
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
 |
Milenko Stefanović is part of the WikiProject Serbia, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
|
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, set up to organize and expand entries on jazz and related subgenres, as well as other related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). |
 |
Milenko Stefanović was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: August 14, 2007 |
I agree. Both articles are about the same person. Andrija
- Merge. Gene Nygaard 22:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Was this a serious GA nomination?
Someone listed it on the WP:GAC page, but there was no template placed here. The article is so clearly deficient in my opinion that i'm thinking maybe someone was just making a mistake in nominating it, the reviews section is little more than a POV fluff section, there are no internal citations to demonstrate that the article actually uses its references, the lead clearly does not summarize the entire article, and even if I wanted to check the references for reliability I couldn't, as only one of them appears to be written in English. Homestarmy 05:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of August 14, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: No, there are many manual of style irregularities " ( violin, piano and, later, clarinet).". The lead section needs to be able to stand on its own as a mini-article per WP:LEAD. Selected recordings section needs to be formatted to look better.
- 2. Factually accurate?: No, there are no inline citations. Only one source is in English.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Education, Awards, Teaching career and Affiliation sections need to be expanded.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: The reviews section is unsourced bias in favor of the article subject.
- 5. Article stability? Yes
- 6. Images?: No
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — T Rex | talk 12:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
