User talk:Mikedow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mikedow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Brian 09:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)btball

Hi, I noticed that your first entry said that you didn't know how to cite sources or add boxes. It looks like you've done a pretty nice job of wikifying the article :-) Some of the links above should help with questions of how to do things in Wikipedia; please feel free to leave a note on my user talk page if you need any help Brian 10:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)btball

1 Henning A. Blomen
2 Your VandalProof Application
3 Recent Edits to WTCN-CA
4 Image copyright problem with Image:Genecotton.jpg
5 Kathleen Troia McFarland
6 Re: WEAT
7 License tagging for Image:Julius Heil.jpg
8 Fair use rationale for Image:Wrlx.png
9 Fair use rationale for Image:Weat.png
10 Non-free use disputed for Image:WPB Tropics.png
11 Fair use rationale for Image:WLVE.gif
12 Fair use rationale for Image:WJNO.png
13 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wrlx.png)
14 Speedy deletion of Adlai Stevenson IV
15 AfD nomination of Adlai Stevenson IV
16 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wftl.gif
17 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wldi.png
18 Image:Wldi.png

[edit] Henning A. Blomen

Hi Mike, I cleaned up your Henning A. Blomen article a bit and fixed the citation you had. I used {{cite news}} for your reference and if you need any more help with citations, see Wikipedia:Citing sources or just ask me. Thanks for all your help! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your VandalProof Application

Dear Mikedow,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen 12:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recent Edits to WTCN-CA

I noticed you added some refrences, on the bottom of the article, that cite some parts of the article. While this new information is helpful, it would be a good idea to link those refrences with real outside sources. You do cite where the information was found, but there are no links to confirm this. Adding links would help keep the article up to date with verified information. Sam 07:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Genecotton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Genecotton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kathleen Troia McFarland

Hi Mike. You recreated the above article that had been deleted through AfD because the subject was not notable. Your comment on the talk page indicated that you did not understand that it had been deleted through this process. If you disagree with this action you are free to bring it to WP:DRV. Best, JChap T/E 00:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I copied the comment you placed at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Troia McFarland to DRV. You might want to go there and make a case to overturn deletion after reading WP:BIO. You could also take a look at Wikipedia:Candidates and elections, but so far this is only a proposed policy. Best, JChap T/E 14:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: WEAT

No problem. I do listen to it almost every day so I noticed that. Flipping words around sometimes me to happens too. =) Copyediting is fun for me anyways. I was creating other Florida radio stations (WLDI-FM, WOLL-FM, and WRMF-FM) and just happened upon WEAT. On another note, I assume you live on the southern end of Florida? Just curious. --AndreniW 19:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Julius Heil.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Julius Heil.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Wrlx.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wrlx.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Weat.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Weat.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:WPB Tropics.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WPB Tropics.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WLVE.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WLVE.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WJNO.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WJNO.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wrlx.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wrlx.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Adlai Stevenson IV

A tag has been placed on Adlai Stevenson IV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 21:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Adlai Stevenson IV

An editor has nominated Adlai Stevenson IV, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adlai Stevenson IV and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wftl.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Wftl.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wldi.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Wldi.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Image:Wldi.png

I have tagged Image:Wldi.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)