User talk:Mike92591
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123 00:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] x86-64 vs. AMD64
- As far as I'm aware, "x86-64" is obsolete nomenclature; AMD renamed it "AMD64" in 2003 [1]. Intel have never referred to their EM64T architecture as "x86-64", AFAIK. I'm curious as to why you feel the need to substitute "x86-64" everywhere you see "AMD64"? Letdorf 23:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC).
Because the name for article is x86-64 now. Mike92591 01:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's what piped links are for (and besides, "AMD64" redirects to the same article). Letdorf 09:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC).
I know, I just figured that sense the name "x86-64" is preferred over "AMD64" in the title I thought that it would be preferred in any other case where the brand is not important.
[edit] Firefox TOC
Hi. Just wondering - did you know the link you added to the Firefox TOC is dead. Do you intend to create this page, else it might be worth removing until then, so that box is kept small. Widefox 18:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
No I didn't know, I had started an article but I guess it was deleted so there isn't a point in keeping it.Mike92591 18:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Munich
Would you like to help out at WikiProject Munich? I think you can really help the project. Kingjeff 20:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm pretty flattered that you think my German is good enough, sure I'll sign up.Mike92591 23:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking on an article for WikiProject Munich. It was about time to get the ball rolling on this project. I'll try and get a few more translators. Kingjeff 00:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Munich Barons
All I did was put that into an online translator and that's basically what I got. So that's what I got. Kingjeff 01:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I'll just translate as much of the weird stuff as I can from scratch then.Mike92591 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] EHC Munich and Munich Barons
Here is an example that you might want to follow for the 2 hockey clubs. I know it's a football manual of style but it's something you can work with. Kingjeff 03:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll see what I can do with it.Mike92591 03:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
How much has been completed of EHC Munich? Kingjeff 01:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
about 3/5 or so.Mike92591 01:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Want to give Unterhaching a try for translation? Kingjeff 02:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
sure Mike92591 02:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't want to sound like I'm dishing out orders. Only do it if you really want to. Kingjeff 02:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Don't worry, I'd honestly rather do this then the hockey ones.Mike92591 02:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:FX2nonOS specific.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:FX2nonOS specific.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Go ahead and delete it, there's no reason in keeping it.Mike92591 17:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Munich District
I put it back up. Don't worry about if you want to d oit or not. Someone else ca ndo it. Kingjeff 20:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Lage-taufkirchen-lkr-m.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Lage-taufkirchen-lkr-m.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Linux
Hello, Mike. I am hoping that Linux can be improved to Featured Article status. I would be grateful for your contribution here. Thanks. Axl 12:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP Munich
WikiProject Munich has over 20 members now which should make for a good WikiProject. To help organize the project, please put down some ideas at the talk page. Kingjeff 02:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP Munich membership
I'm giving WP Munich members a choice of being active members, semi-active members or inactive members. Please sign up for the correct one. Kingjeff 23:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Just started a KDE wikiproject
You seem to put in some effort to helping with KDE and especially Amarok articles. So would you be interested in joining the new KDE wikiproject?
Happysmileman 14:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Linux kernel history
Hi. Your last two edits to History of the Linux kernel gave me a good chuckle :-) I don't have enough time to counter all Thumperward's GNU-minimising efforts, and I've certainly ended up very frustrated at times while trying, but, do try to stay calm.
I would revert it but I don't know which version to revert to - can you pick which is the best starting point? For the Linux kernel history, I agree that describing the evironment that it was born into, and the situations that lead to it's launching, are certainly worth a paragraph or two. --Gronky 21:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked for incivility
I've blocked you for two days due to repeated incivility towards another editor at Talk:History_of_the_Linux_kernel#Pre-history. You're welcome to come back and discuss the issue civilly after the block expires. You may ask for review of the block with {{unblock|your reason here}}.--chaser - t 23:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Table merge
Hi. Please join the discussion on table merges at Talk:Comparison of Linux distributions#Table_merge. Thanks, Technobadger (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fixing "History of Linux"
Hello Mike29591. I see you have put "Finish fixing History of Linux" on your "to do" list. Can you please take a moment to fix the following errors that slipped into the paragraph you seem to have added last October 18th, entitled "Competition from Microsoft":
- Most members of the Linux Community took however left [incomprehensible] and stichelten [foreign word] the topic with jokes...
- Among other things the magazine [which magazine?] did not publish LinuxUser, a completely seriously meant review of Windows XP under the points of criticism of a typical Linux distribution [unclear passage].
- In the context of the Virtualisierung [foreign word] was agreed upon to improve the exchange from Office documents and to simplify the Virtualisierung [foreign word] of the Enterprise solutions in each case under the competition product as well as the integration of Linux and Windows machines into a common directory structure to simplify [incomprehensible sentence].
- The patent protection planned at the same time that customers of an offerer for the use its software of in each case different the offerer may not be sued because of infringement of a patent. This patent protection was expanded also since non-commercial free software developers. The straight last step harvested also criticism, since it included only non-commercial developers with. [This entire passage seems to have been produced by automatic translation software: the syntax is faulty and the sentences are incomprehensible.]
(Note that I've also posted this request on the article's talk page.) Thank you in advance, - Redeyed Treefrog (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Compressed air entry in Comparison of automotive fuel technologies
Could you add compressed air in this article (see Air car? Thanks,
Zippo (talk) 10:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Roman Catholic Church
There is a revote on the FA leave comments page of this article. You are invited to reexamine the article and either confirm or deny your previous vote by voting again. Thanks. NancyHeise (talk) 08:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comparison of programming languages (basic instructions)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Comparison of programming languages (basic instructions), without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Btx40 (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)