User talk:Mike1d

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Regarding edits to NoAdware 2 Spylocked 3 Your comment on my talk page 4 You have been blocked

[edit] Regarding edits to NoAdware

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Mike1d! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bclickbank\.net\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spylocked

Please explain your reason to delete most external links at the talk page. Otto 18:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Do not add spam links to the spylocked article, this is vandalism and will result in your being blocked from wikipedia. Improbcat 20:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment on my talk page

No, I have no association with the XP-vista blog. I am removing your link because you do nothing but spam it to articles over and over, removing other links in the process. Even worse you add "recommended" to the link to make it look like wikipedia recommends your spam links. Spamming is against the guidelines of wikipedia. Improbcat 20:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

ok, i read more about yourself, really sorry for this. but I have not removed all those link first, someone removed my desire links, that's why i am doing so. ok i will not use recommends word again. but you will please keep watching on it because ES10 or something will remove that links.

[edit] You have been blocked

Since you're not using talk pages to make any of your points, and since you've apparently ignored both polite requests and warnings on the subject, I've seen little recourse but to block your account indefinitely. Please do note relevant policies and guidelines, in particular those dealing with conflicts of interest, external links, and possible spam. Users who are here primarily to advertise a particular website, service, or product are generally asked to contribute encyclopedic content, instead of links. If you'd like to do that, you can appeal this block by using the {{unblock}} template. Thank you for your time. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)