User talk:Mikael Häggström

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive

Archives
1 - 2


Contents

[edit] Featured Picture Candidate

Hejsan Mikael -

Your picture "CT of brain of Mikael Häggström.png" is up for consideration for FP status. However, as such, it is too small. Do you have a larger version? If so, please upload it over the old one. Bästa hälsningar, --Janke | Talk 08:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej. There, now it's much larger. There are medium and small versions clickable from it's Commons place. Mvh Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

A comment on FPC: "I wish the uploader would remove those 'copyright free' notes from all images, composite and individual, as that really deters me from supporting." I agree... --Janke | Talk 08:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unencyclopedic article titles

Hi, thanks for all the work on all the hormone/mediator receptors and the cells that express them. I must mention my concern about hard belly and constantly fast dividing cells. Neither of these are particularly encyclopedic article titles, as they are not the accepted terms for the concepts they aim to describe. I have added a {{PROD}} to hard belly because I think the term is vague and non-standard; abdominal distension is much more suitable (and may be a good target for a redirect) because it is a widely recognised term. I have not taken action about constantly fast dividing cells, but I think the relevant information can easily be merged with mitosis, with all incoming links referring to the relevant section on the mitosis page. Let me know what you think about this. JFW | T@lk 11:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Compliments on creating this! ROFL. It is striking how people matching that description can also give a constant headache :-). JFW | T@lk 11:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree, the Hard belly article is vague and non standard. Nevertheless, the symptom deserves mentioning, and I'm not sure if it's enough with the appearances in each cause-article, as abdominal distension is one of many causes. As to Constantly fast dividing cells, I find it hard to choose if really Mitosis, or perhaps Cell division or Cell cycle is the most proper one. When specifically searching for the cells with this characteristic then it might be more complicated to find the way to it, since it looks strange having a See also link of e.g. Mitosis#Constantly fast dividing cells. But perhaps it's worth it. (As to that, I have no further comments!) Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Redirect of Featured images candidates

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Featured images candidates, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Featured images candidates is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Featured images candidates, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead, it was a mistake. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Future wikia

A tag has been placed on Future wikia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/CT of brain of Mikael Häggström.png
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:CT of brain of Mikael Häggström large.png, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Great! Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

== Transatlantic flight ==

Did you intend to do this? It might be considered vandalism. Trekphiler (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Just ignore that... 16:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Swedish

This is the English Wikipedia. Why should primary-topic dis-ambiguation be decided by a Swedish point of view?? Georgia guy (talk) 14:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't mean to have it completely Swedish POV, and I'm sorry if my statement could be interpreted that way. I rather want it international, and in that sense, the disambiguation page is a more suitable target. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 27% of what?

In Peacekeeping - Assessments there was the following comment on the peacekeeping scale:

and was projected to be near 27% in 2003

I moved that here, because it doesn't make any sense for anybody who doesn't know how the scale works, which also is the case for most readers, since there is no such article. Before reinsertion - what is this totality that the scale is 27% of? Mikael Häggström 12:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? THere should be no article for the following because the figure just represents a percentage. Nevertheless I'll check it again and get back to you... LOTRrules (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

It speaks for itself 27% of all UN peacekeeping forces available to the UN. Sorry for the late response. LOTRrules (talk) 01:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for explanation! Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of list of quackery works

I've nominated list of quackery works for deletion. You are invited to comment on the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of quackery works or update the article to address the concerns raised. Cheers, - Zeibura ( talk ) 16:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Facultative

A tag has been placed on Facultative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

When moving pages, please remember to fix any double redirects. These can create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of distinct cell types in the adult human body

Hi Mikael, I see you were one of the last non-IP contributors to this list, so I'm asking you some questions. I've wanted for a long time to see the list of all 210 human cell types and finally found it. I went through the list and added wiki-links where possible, for instance, I changed "Lacrimal gland cell" to "Lacrimal gland cell". My reasoning was that it was more useful to provide a link to a relevant article than show a red-link.

However in doing so, I have also taken away the red-link which shows that we still need an article on the specific cell-type in addition to the article on the gland or organ which contains the cell, and this is now bothering me. Which do you think is more important for this list, showing the articles not yet created, or providing a link to the closest alernative? Would another alternative be: Lacrimal gland -- Lacrimal gland cell ? or Lacrimal gland cell ?

Your comments are appreciated! Franamax (talk) 04:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions! I made an entry in that article's talk page. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pain and nociception

Hi,

You may not know it, but Pain and nociception is the medical collaboration of the week. I think you were interested in the page at one point, perhaps you'd like to re-visit? WLU (talk) 20:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Interesting subject indeed. I may have a look. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Space lens

Hi. I just wanted to apologize in advance for some of my edit summaries etc. When I first saw your line about a solar lens at Lens (optics), I took it as either patent nonsense designed to mislead, or as original research. I was mostly misled by the lack of citations, and the gross exaggeration in the image. It's hard to look at the image and not be led to believe the whole concept is ridiculous. The lens shown is larger in diameter than the Earth (and clearly much larger than necessary) and would probably weigh more than the Moon. By the time we can fabricate something like that, global warming will no longer be a problem (one way or another). A more realistic image would be beneficial. Leaving the Sun out of the picture would greatly simplify this. Then the lens and the Earth could be shown in reasonable scale. I'm not sure the current image is worthwhile. Its negatives may outweigh the benefits.

I agree with the deletion of this from Lens (optics). Including it there violates WP:CRYSTAL. This application is not likely enough to occur, to merit mention in a general article. Even where it is appropriate (like in Solar shade), speculative material such as this needs to be very rigidly tied to its sources. Wikipedia can't discuss the possibility of producing a solar lens, it can only discuss what other people have said or written on the subject. --Srleffler (talk) 03:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Very well, it may not be appropriate in Lens (optics). I thought it as a very interesting example for high school kids who didn't see any point of learning what a concave lens would be good for, but sure it might be a little too much of a crystal ball there. Mikael Häggström (talk) 04:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Antinatalism addition

Yo Mikael, did you have a reliable source for this addition? I don't doubt the information, but I do wonder where it's coming from. Thanks, Skomorokh 15:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually I have no source to that such people generally support population control etc., and on second thought I think it's better to leave that fact out. Therefore I did some rewording, keping it to the words and not the people. I hope there is consensus about linking antinatalism with population control and family planning - else I can accept removing the whole contribution. Anyhow, thanks for notification! Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
It is interpretation, but it is not controversial or in bad faith, so unless someone else objects to it, I am happy with your latest version. Best, Skomorokh 18:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Humanism (life stance)

Hello Mikael Häggström. How are you? I hope you are doing well! Thank you for your contributions to the article Humanism (life stance). Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

All well. I appreciate your contributions too! Best regards Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of List of ongoing conflicts 2007-current by world map

I have nominated List of ongoing conflicts 2007-current by world map, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ongoing conflicts 2007-current by world map. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sceptre (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:CT of Mikael Häggström's brain

Template:CT of Mikael Häggström's brain has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 20:22, May 13, 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of World development

I have nominated World development, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World development. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 19:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Revision history of Angiotensin receptor

I was wondering if you could explain why you removed the Gq/11 under mechanism in your 16:07, 17 December 2007 edit. The way it reads now it seems factually incorrect as Gi would not activate PLC. VanillaIcee (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

If you refer to this edit, it's not an edit of mine, and I agree it's incorrect, and I undid it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)