Talk:Mikkel Kessler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Mikkel Kessler falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome!

Satellite Image of Denmark

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ).
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is part of WikiProject Boxing, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

Kessler can take all three of those names (Lacy, Calzaghe, Beyer).


I feel the same way. Kessler has the most potential (hopefully his back is okay though). He has power and great boxing skills, as well as a jackhammer jab. -- jorgekluney.

From the article: "Andrade even managed to win the 11th round"

Considering all three scorecards show Kessler winning the match 120-108, I fail to see how this claim is supported by evidence. Teral 13:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Content

The content reads more like a news article than an encyclopedic entry, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.236.25 (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

-True. This was obviously made by fan boys.