Talk:Mike Sweeney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Baseball / Players      (Rated B-Class) Portal Baseball Portal Mike Sweeney is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by Players task force. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Biography     (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Categories

Could someone correct whatever is keeping the categories from appearing at the bottom of the page? --Jackal4 (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Someone didn't close a couple of references, it's all fixed now though.--Borgarde^talk 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good source

SPRING TRAINING A's are for real, just ask SweeneyUser:calbear22 (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "Nice Guy"

I changed the title of "An All-Around Nice Guy" section to "Community Involvement." Describing him as a "nice guy," let alone making that the name of a section, is pretty flagrantly POV no matter how you look at it. Jcb9 (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)