User talk:Mihail ioniu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome! 2 Gjergj Arianit Komneni 3 Voicu 4 Louis XIV

[edit] Welcome!

Hi Mihail ioniu, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia. Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images. How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status. Manual of Style, how articles should be written.

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism. Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable. Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created. Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one. Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 19:40, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gjergj Arianit Komneni

Your article Gjergj Arianit Komneni has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 01:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Voicu

Pentru ca este o speculatie. O forma atestata nu se inlocuieste cu o presupunere, indiferent cat de plauzibila ar fi, cu atat mai mult cu cat niste utilizatori sarbi se apucasera sa "reconstituie numele" in sarbeste. Cred ca e de datoria oricarui wikipedist sa inlature speculatia, si sa ramana la surse. Restul demagogiei pe care ai exprimat-o pe pagina mea nu ma intereseaza foarte tare, dar as vrea sa te uiti prin urmatoarele articole: Begging the question, Argumentum ad baculum, No true Scotsman. Nici eu nu intentionez absolut nici o polemica, asa ca, daca vrei sa prelungesti discutia cu un discurs gen "fratii romani" si "confiscare", mai bine nu. Dahn 16:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Cu nevoie sau fara: cea ce am spus este ca numele este speculat intr-o anumita forma, neatestata de surse. Ceea ce nu are nici o legatura cu cine locuia in zona etc. Dahn 17:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

^De altfel, asta face ca afirmatiile despre "amatorism","dat cu parerea" si "informatii serioase" sa cat se poate de paradoxale. Dahn 00:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Louis XIV

I don't disagree that it may be true; I think it's tangential to the article, and debatable as to the menaing of "effective." Coemgenus 18:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

It might make sense to put it in a footnote. Coemgenus 19:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)