Talk:Mihrab
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
[edit] Not that it's extremely important, but why the revert?
A sentence in this article ("The sign was however just a sign on the wall, and the wall itself remained flat.") seems redundant, and, well, kind of a bad sentence in general. I changed it to "However, architecture of the mosque remained the same" as I was passing through. (Looking back, it'd be better if I had said "However, architecture of mosques remained the same", but oh well.) Was just wondering why the revert from someone (hopefully) more knowledgable about mosque architecture. 16:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Its a question of context continuity...
- Step 1. Sign hung on the wall. No change to wall itself.
- Step 2. Niche created in the wall to hang the sign in.
- Step 3. Everyone recognizes what the niche is for, so sign becomes redundant.
- Now change things to read what you wrote.
- Step 1. "architecture of mosques remained the same"
- Step 2. Niche created in the wall to hang the sign in.
- Step 3. Everyone recognizes what the niche is for, so sign becomes redundant.
- Not so good, right? -- Fullstop (talk) 03:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)