Talk:Midge Hadley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Midge Hadley has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 11, 2007 Peer review Reviewed March 28, 2007 Good article nominee Listed Current Status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Midge Hadley article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Pass Good Article

I have passed this article as a Good Article. Some of the prose in the article could be improved to be slightly clearer and more interesting, but none of it was gramatically incorrect and I understood everything. Also, some of the references to collectability seem like they could be written to be based less on the collector's perspective. Perhaps instead of 'highly sought after by collectors', something like, 'is very rare'. Although, I think this is probably a preference issue. Good Job on the article.-Dekkanar 15:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)