User talk:Michael042
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
However, the addition of the http://www.proto-english.org/ address to websites is a contravention of Wikipolicy. Please note that, while it is inordinately interesting, it fails the WP:SOURCE policy for original research and published works. Please do not continue to include it on articles. Thanks! CMacMillan 17:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Origin of the Franks
I'm looking at Origin of the Franks, which you just created. I'm wondering if this is an original creation of your own, or is it from somewhere else? The fact that it's in the style of a series of questions and answers makes it seem like it's a FAQ page. eaolson 15:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
The text is entirely mine. - Michael042
[edit] Anglo-Saxons - English?
Very interesting link to your ideas that England never was Celtic - conflicts with other websites such as englandandenglishhistory.com which argue the adventus saxonem brought the english to the british isles and that it was always Germanic. I couild agree with this. Some decriptions of 'Celts' are very teutonic. Celts were short and mediteranean looking. Like Basques. Gauls were partly Germanic to be reinforced by the Germanic Franks later. Celtism is a myth invented to keep the British 'illusion' going. It has just got very confused!
[edit] September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Franks. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Liverpool Scouse 15:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Franks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Why are you removing this content? If you don't have a VERY good reason, or haven't discussed it and reached a consensus for removal of the content ont he article's talk page, blanking of whole sections of content is considered vandalism. Liverpool Scouse 15:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
This was a mistake. It has been undone.
[edit] Morini
I noticed you were the main contributor to the page (thank you). I notice it needs references. Would you be so kind as to go to the page and list your references at the bottom of the page? Thanks Goldenrowley (talk) 05:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles, as you did to Celts. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. You have added your personal website to 4 articles today, despite being told that it is a contravention of WP:SOURCE as well as a conflict of interest. Please read the relevant Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
