Talk:Microsoft Robotics Studio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Microsoft Robotics Studio is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, an attempt to standardise coverage of Robotics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article or section is written like an advertisement. Please help rewrite this article from a neutral point of view. Mark blatant advertising which would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic for speedy deletion, using {{db-spam}}. (December 2007) |
[edit] Player Project
Player Project has its own wikipedia page, so information about player project belongs there, including external links. An entry in the see also section is more appropriate pcrtalk 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- It is relevant the good and bad thing of an article topic, for a NPOV. I.e. Esperanto, Biodiesel, Ethanol fuel and so on. One can do it in two ways. Include a criticism section or include a link to other robotics suites (the concurrency it is basic for full NPOV - i.e. see cars topics-). --Altermike 06:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Can you rephrase this in plain english please, I am having great difficulty following your argument. pcrtalk 00:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- A lot of articles includes criticism to the different topics and because of this, they are neutral. Non-neutrality would be not include the criticism to the article. (have you seen any article of the mentioned?)--Altermike 17:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can you rephrase this in plain english please, I am having great difficulty following your argument. pcrtalk 00:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Logo
The logo programming language has no direct relevance to Microsoft Robotics Studio. While Microsoft Visual Programming Language, as a dataflow language has some similarities to functional programming languages like logo, and while robotic turtles have been used in robotics education, there is not currently any work that I am aware of that makes this relevant pcrtalk 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- As in Player Project, one can include this in the criticism section (as in other products, it forgets this traditional and easy to use robotic language ) or as a link. --Altermike 06:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License
The License is listed as CTP, but Microsoft has a specific page on it with terms: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/robotics/bb332140.aspx. Should there be a link to this somewhere, or on the CTP page maybe? 68.163.238.177 01:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, if that is the CTP it should be linked to on the CTP page. If it isn't the CTP, this article should be changed so the license name is correct and the link added here. NicM 08:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC).
