Talk:Microprocessor Chronology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] To do list
This is a promising article, but it needs some work to bring up the quality:
- Specify clock frequency ranges: Instead of just specifying one speed, the range should be given. This is more informative and less biased. (Listing the max. for one chip and the min. for another is misleading and plain wrong!)
- Check facts: I had a quick look and found obvious mistakes, though more checking is required. A quick look at the charts for each processor should give plenty of information that can be used for checking.
- x86-centric: More architectures are needed to complete the list. The article is after all, 'Microprocessor Chronology', not 'x86 Chronology'
- Transistor counts: If anyone has a better looking and more elegant way of presenting this information, please make the required changes.
- Table appearance: If anyone can make the four tables uniform in column width, I think it will be better. Please do so if possible.
