Talk:Mick LaSalle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Restoring controversial review paragraph

I have restored the paragraph about the about the controversial review of Monsters House that a user (PEQUOTWARS contribs) has removed twice without any justification; the first removal also messed the rest of the article. The user has edited just this page. According to the biographies of living persons policy, i think that the paragraph about the controversial review of Monster's House, should be left. It is well sourced, with references to the original review and the comment of a renowed artist (look at the Jeff Pidgeon filmography on imdb). It tries to do not use weasel words, and hopefully it is sufficiently NPOV.

Probably some quotes of the review could help to better understand the controversy. From Mick LaSalle review, when talking about motion capture technologies:

[animated movies] ... never had the ability to show the human face. There was never any point to a close-up in an animated film -- there was never really anything to see... Imagine what Disney might have done with this in the creation of the Seven Dwarfs. Imagine all the things that will be done with this in the future. "Monster House" looks like the ground floor of something important.

It is easy to understand why many professional animators were upset from the above sentences... ALoopingIcon 05:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

An anonymous user has removed this paragraph again. Reverted. Twice. ALoopingIcon 21:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)