Talk:Michail Aleksandrovich Sholokhov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Look to Russian page! --62.76.36.10 05:53, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
- Look at the recent addition by 68.159.176.191. I don't know for now, but when you posted your suggestion, I looked to the Russian page. Even image there was very biased, not speaking about the article itself. Solzhenitsyn is not the "last instance" for all questions. Cmapm 23:38, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Vodka, Vodka, mat' rodnaya!
Recently found soviet medical documents show the guy became a chronic drunkard rather early. Vodka is a sad fate hitting so many russian people and this is the reason for his rapid decline in later works' quality, not plagiarism!
There is a new film version of "And quiet flows the Don", by Sergei Bondarchuk, which started being shown on Channel One in Russia on November 7 2006. It has a number of well-know Western actors in it, including Rupert Everett.
Я английский плохо говорить :) Про "плагиат": уже давно доказано, что "Тихий дон" Шолохов написал сам. Читайте русскую статью на http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%2C_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BB_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 и эти ссылки:
- Феликс Кузнецов „НАЙДЕНА РУКОПИСЬ «ТИХОГО ДОНА»!“ (Из речи на Х Съезде писателей России) 1999 г.
- Феликс Кузнецов „Книга века. Рукопись «Тихого Дона» найдена и спасена.“
- Кузнецов Ф. „Рукопись «Тихого Дона» и проблема авторства.“ // Новое о Михаиле Шолохове: Исследования и материалы / РАН; Ин-т мировой лит. им. А. М. Горького. — М.: ИМЛИ РАН, 2003. — С. 96—206.
-
- Желательно английскую статью откорректировать.
-
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sholokov and Khrushchev 1959.jpg
Image:Sholokov and Khrushchev 1959.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sholokov and Khrushchev 1959.jpg
Image:Sholokov and Khrushchev 1959.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Veshenskaya
Sholokhov was born in the Kruzhilin khutor, which was part of the Cossack stanitsa Vyeshenskaya (Vyoshenskaya) and resided in the stanitsa for much of his life. It now hosts the Sholokhov museum. Kamenskaya is an obvious error. Even the Wiki entry for Veshenskaya lists it as the birthplace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AllenHansen (talk • contribs) 11:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Silent Don Manuscript
Should we add that the manuscript of the 1st volume has been found and copies placed in the Russian National Library?AllenHansen (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC) http://www.1tv.ru/owa/win/ort6_main.main?p_news_title_id=116182&p_news_razdel_id=6
[edit] Contradiction
In And Quiet Flows the Don#Literary significance and criticism it is said that: A statistical analysis by V. P. and T. G. Fomenko also came to the conclusion that the book was plagiarized while in this article it is sayd that A 1984 monograph by Geir Kjetsaa and others demonstrated through statistical analyses that Sholokhov was indeed the likely author of Don.
Besides this, the article And Quiet Flows the Don clearly "condemns" the Sholokhov, while in Michail Aleksandrovich Sholokhov the POV is the opposite, equilibrium is needed. Epinheiro (talk) 13:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)