Talk:Michael T. Sauer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been assessed as Low-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on May 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus, defaults to keep. |
Contents |
[edit] Comments
Delete. There is an arbitrary large number of judges in the United States justice system. Should it be acceptable for every single judge to have an article here on Wikipedia just because they ruled on a case? I think the answer is no. High profile cases such as the O.J. Simpson trials might warrant a page for Lance Ito. A page for Michael Sauer just because he sentenced Paris to jail doesn't really provide him any notoriety. Tigerman81 05:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Negatori. I came on to Wikipedia to find out about this guy because I was frustrated about all the news stories about his decision carefully skirting around his name, nevermind finding out about his actual office or any details about him. It's appropriate for Wikipedia to have an entry about him as he is part of a high-profile and noteworthy event. MKFreeberg 20:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Comments
His office number and email address should be posted in the wiki —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.76.82.89 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC).
- Why?WP 03:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- i disagree in the strongest terms. this would alost certainly invite people who feel very strongly about the hilton case. (which, by the way, is exaggerated out of proportion.) furthermore, personal contact information has no place in wikipedia, because it is no ecyclopedic information.--Nevrdull 13:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Let the entry remain
One event does make a moment, it becomes a snapshot in time of people and situations. This moment has become a pop news item that will need explaining to the public. that is the reason I cam to it and the reason other will as well. I wanted a pic of the judge - it was here ... that is why if for no other reason —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.109.75.155 (talk) 01:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC).
It definately should stick, for the time being. Maybe when the newstory isn't so fresh it could be removed.--Iamstillhiro1112 03:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- People, this was decided last month, see the archived discussion above. No need to comment again (the 1st comment was left in the wrong area). If someone thinks it should be deleted then they can AFD the article. Till then, let it be. Aboutmovies 03:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unsourced items
The following was removed as unsourced per WP:LIVING
==TV Personality== Sauer has previously admitted that he has always wanted to pursue a TV personality. "Appearing tough and causing headlines is how I want to be known" he said to Barbara Walters on Monday, June 18th, 2007 on The View. When asked why he was so harsh with Paris Hilton he commented, "Barbara, L.A. needs to show that we are strong on crime and we need to show that no celebrity is above the law. If I could I'd sentence her to two years in jail."
Feel free to re-add when sourced. Aboutmovies 20:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
No mention of the rumored homosexuality incident? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.147.166.87 (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
