Talk:Michael Shellenberger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Vanity

Does anyone else believe that this is vanity before I apply CSD A1 to this article? Sydney Know It Alltalk 05:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

An edit seems reasonable but not deletion. Seems to me that entry is fair considering amount of debate and controversy over Nordhaus/Schellenberger death of environmentalism thesis, and new book. Note that entries exist for authors like William McKibben and Michael Pollan. There is discussion there, too, over sourcing, but entries still exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FairPlay1 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

CSD A1 refers to lack of context. I'm not seeing anything about using CSD for vanity.66.28.54.254 (talk) 05:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)FairPlay1

Dear Sydney, I tried my best to write this as NPOV. However, if you think it needs an edit, please go for it. I hardly think it merits a CSD A1, however! That would seem fairly extreme. I'd say the entry meets Wiki standards of Bios of Living Persons, especially in the context of other authors represented on Wiki. GreenExpert (talk) 23:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Could use an NPOV edit, but also an edit for length. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.1.213.162 (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)