Talk:Michael Lohman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Unlisting from VfD

Except for the one vote which appears to be made by the VfD lister, the consesus has been to keep the page, so I'm removing the VfD listing, especially in light of new information as of April 24 that needs adding. Sirmob 04:24, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Are you allowed to just remove it? I thought that admins have to do that? Willowx 6 July 2005 08:10 (UTC)

You are correct - I'm making a comment to the effect of "I made a mistake" on the VfD page and listing it on today's VfD page, which was never done which is why no admin acted.

---

No consensus on vfd vote per Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Michael_Lohman. --Woohookitty 04:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New York Post Should not be Used as a Reference

It is a tabloid and is not the least bit reliable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Exit 0 (talk • contribs) .

But its not being used as a reference really, is it? It seems like it is being used to say "this was sensational - New York Post covered it which was part of that sensationalism" Sirmob 03:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lohman2.jpg

Image:Lohman2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)