Talk:Michael Henderson (writer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Can we have this semi-protected? It's obvious that it attracts vandalism, and for many reasons I can see why, but that is still no excuse. RobinCarmody (talk) 21:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed by subject
Henderson has disputed some of the facts of this article [1] and they need citation if they are to survive. I'd also question the claims of controversy; all blogs and comment sections attract crankiness, and unless RS observation that he is controversial is produced, those statements will have to go. Mangoe (talk) 01:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Warning - violators will be blocked
I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 15:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)