Talk:Michael D. Murphy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] State bar records

TX's state bar has a database that includes disbarred attorneys; I've linked to Murphy's entry since it's the most authoritative source of data on TX disbarments. LA's state bar online appears to list only "active" lawyers, so no link. rewinn 20:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About other scandals

This article is not about other officers. There may be some relevance to the fact that the Murphy scandal comes at around the time of other scandals involving other Air Force officers, but details about those other scandals should go on those other officers' pages. rewinn 17:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

That being said: a reference to another scandal was deleted with the reason given being that the other officer was not a JAG; however, the article did not assert that the other officer's a JAG, only that the other officer was a high Air Force officer, like the subject of the article. This may or may not be noteworthy; I've restored the content (accurately, and in its own section) and leave it for others to discuss its noteworthiness. rewinn 16:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sources required

An anonymous editor is trying to add information without providing sources, and in addition it consists largely of commentary. You can't do that, because wikipedia is not a blog. Why not simply PROVIDE a source for the additions, and refrain from the commentary. rewinn (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)