Talk:Michael Curtiz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Major sourcing effort needed
Here's just one section:
- Curtiz is often [for example, where?] used as an example of a director who was not an auteur - that is, an artist with a recognizable style; he worked in many different genres, and did not use unusual cinematography or editing. However, admirers of his work [such as?] argue [where?] that by the 1940s, Curtiz had developed an extremely sophisticated [a bit weaselly] visual style, marked by fluid camera movement, strong compositions and textured [come again?] lighting, that is recognizable to the perceptive viewer.
-- Hoary 14:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA nod
This is article is way too short to be a GA - needs more detail on just about ever aspect. Mad Jack 08:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)