User talk:Metsman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Johnson-Robert-King-of-the-Delta-Blues-Singers-vol-2-115049.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnson-Robert-King-of-the-Delta-Blues-Singers-vol-2-115049.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:King of the Blues Album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:King of the Blues Album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Let it Be

OK. Why do you think that 4.5/5 rating (90%) is a negative review? --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 20:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Its not actually 4.5/5 it is the user review. The actual review from 1970 was negative.

OK, that works. An edit summary would help to prevent heart attacks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 20:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)