Talk:Metahistory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
[edit] Merge
It is certainly true that many notable books have their own page, but this is only necessary when there is so much information that the author's own page would become cluttered. In this instance, I was able to merge the entire content of this article into the article on Hayden White without any appreciable cluttering of that article. If the information on the book becomes so long that it takes over the other article, this article can certainly be restored, but as of now it is simply not needed. Indrian 19:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Article length has nothing to do with merger, just because you physically can fit it into the article doesn't mean it should be merged. Also how much do you know about the subject (Hayden White and metahistory?). Please follow up at Talk:Hayden White as that's where the proposed merge tags point for discussion. -- Stbalbach 20:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
The link to the page at Stanford is dead -- is there an updated one?
[edit] ==Expand to describe the different archetypes==
It would be valuable to know what are the different archetypes of historians that this book believes exist. --64.230.121.26 17:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
