User talk:Messenger2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome.

Contents

[edit] Soybean editing

Hi, if a user is blatantly adding content which is not from a NPOV, consider adding the appropriate warning to their talk page. If they are not so blatant you may want to leave a custom message explaining the problem with the users edit.--Andeh 09:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Soy Bean page

The vandalism summary is gone from the history now and the bug that caused that fixed. Thanks.Voice-of-All 19:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

That is content dispute and not vandalism. Please do not report content disputes on WP:AIV, it might mislead the administrators. If you think a user has breached WP:3RR report it on the appropriate page. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 17:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Messenger2010 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Yankees76 03:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Lol

Sarcasam is so lameJohnpedia 05:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Something tells me you are not here to build a great encyclopaedia. You are now blocked indefinitely. To appeal this b lock use {{unblock}} on your talk page. Note that your past behaviour (including sockpuppetry) has influenced this decision, and your recent bogus warnings are also evidence of disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Guy (Help!) 11:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My warning were legitamte but you are entitled to your opinion. I was never told my warning were not legit. You should not block an editor just for issuing warnings. Request for unblock. --Messenger2010 16:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "On the contrary, your "warnings" could be seen as harassment to an extent + sock concerns-- Tawker 00:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.