User talk:Messedrocker/Stablepedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sectioning
Where are ecology, environmental science, glaciology, hydrology, limnology, palynology, soil science, and space science articles intended to go? I advocate renaming the "Geology, geophysics, and meteorology" section to the "Earth sciences" section (see category/article structure at Portal:Science) to accomodate the balance of earth sciences. Alternatively, if "geology" in the section title is intended to encompass the balance of earth sciences the section could be renamed "geosciences, geophysics, and meteorology" -- Paleorthid 02:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] There already is a Stablepedia
- You've seen that actual site called Stablepedia, right? Just to avoid confusion, you might want to avoid calling your project that. :) --ragesoss 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- I hadn't thought of that! Anyways, please suggest new names. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 03:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Stablepedia.org focusses on unvandalized versions. The "stablepedia-soon-to-be-renamed" articles will be the versions most recently assessed for the Project wikipedia:worklist or assessment, in that assessment is often preceeded by article clean-up: the assessment is often a call for collaboration for further improvement towards GA or FA. Rather than "stable" being the operative concept, the new name should evoke something like "benchmark", "clear-point", or "clean-point". -- Paleorthid 17:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I hadn't thought of that! Anyways, please suggest new names. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 03:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- stablepedia.org looks cool! admins should use it as the page to use for locking on for edit wars, instead of whatever happens to be the current page. Mathmo Talk 06:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Test Release Versions
I'm confused...what makes this different than the test release versions (0.5, 0.7, 1.0, etc.)? Is it the same basic idea? Why? → JARED (t) 04:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- This page will be working in conjunction with WikiProjects and the WP 1.0 crew to produce a list of acceptable versions of articles. ★TWO YEARS OF MESSEDROCKER★ 04:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:0.5 articles explicitly turned down (and why)
Please fix the listed problems, or find an earlier version that will work! ★MESSEDROCKER★ 23:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Anthropology - citations needed
- Leonardo da Vinci - citations needed
- Shoe polish - citations needed
- Atlantis - citations needed
- Claude Lévi-Strauss - no sources formally cited
- Science - "Wikipedia articles needing factual verification" category
- Toy - citations needed
- Love - citations needed
- Information - citations needed, again! c'mon guys, citing sources isn't that hard!
- Mail - citations needed, etc.