Talk:Mesh analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject on Electronics This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Peer review Mesh analysis has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

[edit] Discussion

The Mesh analysis and Node analysis are useful way to find the current and voltage across a certain branch of circuit. I don t think there is enough information on this subject. For a learner, I don' t think he can performa the analysis by just looking at the article. Can somebody help extent it with some details and examples, as well as some cross-reference?

Here are some details I suggest: - the inventor of the Mesh method - step by step examples

 identify the mesh loops
 forming the linear equations with mesh current as the variable
 solving the matrix

- limitations on applying Mesh analysis, such as a circuit in 3D space, etc.

[edit] Editing article

I have been editing this article and trying to make it better. Is there information that I am missing or am I including too much information? Does the structure of the article make sense. Is there anyway that I can make the article better? Any input would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Mrball25 (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for peer-review

I am new a Wikipedia and want this article to be complete and up to the standards of Wikipedia. Is there information that I am missing or am I including too much information? Does the structure of the article make sense. Is there anyway that I can make the article better?

RfCs aren't really set up for review, I'll submit this to our peer-review system instead. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)