User talk:Mertozoro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Awesome Express

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Awesome Express, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Awesome Express. Fritzpoll (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Use of sockpuppets

I suspect you are creating new accounts to argue with me on the talk page of Awesome Express. This is against policy WP:SSP and is unnecessary. To contest deletion, you only have to remove the template, as the template itself tells you to do! :) Fritzpoll (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Planet Express

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Planet Express, you will be blocked from editing. --EEMIV (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Old Freebie, you will be blocked from editing. Fritzpoll (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Old Freebie

Just please leave me alone, it's my article stop STOP redirecting it, you take away information from Wikipedia by doing that, and I have a mention about the episode A Taste Of Freedom.Can't you just give up?????Please.Mertozoro (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

It is not your article. I'm just doing what the consensus in the community is - that this is not a notable topic for an isolated article. I understand that you may be frustrated, but perhaps, rather than creating a new article on this, you can just add your material to the episode article, which will be much less controversial? Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 23:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mertozoro for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

[edit] Speedy deletion of You Do (Family Guy)

A tag has been placed on You Do (Family Guy) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fritzpoll (talk) 17:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nigel Pinchley

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nigel Pinchley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nigel Pinchley. Fritzpoll (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Ramon Artagaveytia

A tag has been placed on Ramon Artagaveytia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ramon Artagaveytia. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Specifically sections which were a cut and paste from http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/biography/10/ which is Copyright 1996-2007 encyclopedia titanica. These sections have been removed from the article, you are welcome to rewrite the sections in your own words but please do not replace the copyrighted material. nancy ^(talk) 17:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ramon Artagaveytia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ramon Artagaveytia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ramon Artagaveytia. Fritzpoll (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Bruce the Performance Artist (Family Guy), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Bruce the Performance Artist (Family Guy) is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Bruce the Performance Artist (Family Guy) saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. edg ☺ ☭ 05:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Olivia Fuller

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Olivia Fuller, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Olivia Fuller. edg ☺ ☭ 05:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You Do (Family Guy)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article You Do (Family Guy), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of You Do (Family Guy). edg ☺ ☭ 05:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Elisabeth Walton Allen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elisabeth Walton Allen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Elisabeth Walton Allen. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chicago Jazz Music → Music of Chicago

Thanks for creating the Chicago jazz article. This has lots of potential.

Per MOS:CAP#Section headings, "Chicago Jazz Music" is miscapitalized, and as a historical music article it would be better entitled Music of Chicago. I have detailed the reasons for this suggestion in Talk:Chicago Jazz Music. Would you be okay with this change? / edg ☺ ☭ 18:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure, you can change the title, im ok with that!!!!Mertozoro (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Great. I see you beat me to it. :-) / edg ☺ ☭ 20:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Minor character articles being deleted

I'm not the one who proposed Awesome Express for deletion, but in general you'll find that new articles on minor characters from fiction are quickly deleted from Wikipedia because of insufficient notability. I would recommend reading the following for suggestions on how to contribute to Wikipedia on this sort of subject:

Other wikis that may need character articles:

TV IV – site for practically all TV shows
Futurama Wiki – almost any TV show with a following has a wiki on Wikia

/ edg ☺ ☭ 19:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ismet Baba Fish Restaurant

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ismet Baba Fish Restaurant, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ismet Baba Fish Restaurant. Fritzpoll (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Nigel Pinchley

I have nominated Nigel Pinchley, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Pinchley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Fritzpoll (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Capitalization

Just to let you know, article titles on Wikipedia use minimal capitalization. "Hot jazz" gets a capital H at the beginning of a sentence, but other wise is "hot jazz". Relevant guidelines and policy:

Articles usually get an initial capital because the Wikimedia software defaults this way. Only recently has it become possible to force an initial lower-case, and even this is display-only; the article title (in the URL) still has an initial capital. (Example: gOS.)

One of the editors creating new animal articles has been insisting on his own capitalization, and edit warring over it, but these will eventually need to be moved to correct capitalization. You can reduce this eventual workload by using correct Wikipedia naming conventions.

Wrong: Black-chinned Emperor Tamarin‎
Correct: Black-chinned emperor tamarin‎

Wrong: Lesser Egyptian Jerboa
Correct: Lesser Egyptian jerboa – Egyptian is a proper noun, but jerboa is not

Wrong: Echimys Braziliensis
Correct: Echimys braziliensis – braziliensis is not a proper noun, but a taxonomic term derived from a proper noun

That might take some getting used to if you are used to liberal capitalization, but it is quite natural once one becomes used to it.

Thanks again for your contributions. / edg ☺ ☭ 22:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tawbon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tawbon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Hkachang. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Zayatgyi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zayatgyi, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Kyundaw. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.