User talk:Mercury543210
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Leave a message
Section intended for quick notes left by others, which will be removed once acknowledged/dealt with. More substantial comments should
be added in the usual way. Thanks.
[edit] Historicity of Jesus:Talk - re unsigned post
Thanks for pointing that out, I've signed it now!
I think there used to be a bot that automatically signed unsigned posts - presumably it's either gone out of action or didn't work on that post for some reason. I wouldn't have minded, and I suspect that most other people wouldn't, due to the existence of the bot anyway, which no-one complained about!
Thanks for letting me know! TJ 11:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] P4
Good work with starting P4. I hope you don't mind that I expanded it and reformatted the references. I didn't realize you were still working on it at the exact same time as me, so I ran into some edit conflicts. Hopefully, nothing was lost in the shuffle.-Andrew c [talk] 23:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: UBX
No problemo :-) I certainly don't mind others building off of my work. That's what a wiki is all about, anyway ;-) -- P.B. Pilhet 03:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Second Epistle to the Thessalonians
Excellent work on this article - thorough, even handed, and informative. If only everybody who contributed took the same care! --Rbreen (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Thanks for your improvements.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 07:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] re:First Epistle to Timothy
I fixed the talk page issue. Apparently the talk page has been at Talk:1st Timothy for over a couple years, and just today someone deleted the redirect (but not the actual talk page). Moving Talk:1st Timothy to Talk:First Epistle to Timothy has restored the talk page. As for your second request, because an anonymous editor hasn't even edited the article since January 6th, I can't say that semi-protection would be helpful (in that the article is not currently under attack, nor does it seem to be frequently visited by vandals). But I will watchlist it now so another set of eyes will be on the look out for future vandals. Hope this helps, and thanks for contacting me regarding these issues.-Andrew c [talk] 00:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry I haven't been around more to give active input into these articles. I will say this about semi-protection, there has only been 1 or 2 anonymous or newly created users who have edited this page in the past month. And all of those edits have been in good faith, and not blatant vandalism. The anonymous user hasn't even edited in 4 days. Therefore, the status of the article does not meet any of the requirements for Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Semi-protection. Sorry. ;)-Andrew c [talk] 21:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
