User talk:Mercster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wat?


[edit] Arnold Murray

In regards to [1],

Please don't accuse editors of vandalism unless you're absolutely sure they have committed it. In particular, avoid using the word in edit summaries (such as "reverting vandalism"), and be very careful about posting vandalism warning templates on user's talkpages. Review the vandalism policy thoroughly before you do that, and see especially the section "What vandalism is not". Note that content disputes are not vandalism, and that good-faith edits of any kind, even if you think them misguided, are not to be considered vandalism. Vandalism accusations without any basis in policy are bad for the climate on the wiki and make constructive discussion more difficult. See WP:VAND: "If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as such, then it is he or she who is actually harming the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors." See also Wikipedia:Avoid the word "vandal".

.

That edit was not made in good faith, read it again. Thanks! Mercster (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Can you please cite from the Wikipedia:Vandalism policy how this fulfils the definition of vandalism, as far as I am concerned adding sourced content is not vandalism. Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

and [2], Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Arnold Murray. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Camaron | Chris (talk) 10:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll say whatever I like on talk pages. Thanks! Mercster (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but you should be aware of the consequences. Continues violations of policies such as WP:NPA and WP:3RR despite warnings is considered disruptive and could result in you been blocked from editing by me or another administrator - so I would you suggest you take advice carefully, and review relevant policies such as WP:OWN and WP:AGF to avoid problems. Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Arnold Murray

An article that you have been involved in editing, Arnold Murray, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Murray (2nd nomination). Thank you. Camaron | Chris (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Mom must be proud.Mercster (talk) 13:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Arnold Murray. Instead, assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. I am getting more concerned over your recent edits, your contributions are welcome, but some of your comments recently are not. The comments you left here are very close to a personal attack, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. There is nothing wrong with making and receiving constructive criticism, but personal attacks are not helpful and will not help your case in getting the article kept. Similar things can can be said about this and this. Camaron | Chris (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Leave me alone. I'm smart, you are not. Mercster (talk) 02:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This is the last chance saloon - you have been given multiple warnings to stop, you have either ignored them, stated that you refuse to follow behavioural guidelines, or made further personal attacks as a response (such as the above). Camaron | Chris (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Can I not put a stop to your incessant rambling, even on my own talk page? I'm not interested in anything you have to say that isnt directly related to the content of articles. Thanks! Mercster (talk) 18:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes indeed you can, by listening to the warnings, and following the WP:AGF and WP:NPA policies from now on please. You can remove comments from your talk page, and I will respect your preferences to keep chatter to the minimum, but it is not reasonable to expect to not receive standard warnings for policy violation issues. Camaron | Chris (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Arnold Murray Article

I must say, you all seem to be doing a bang up job for AM, he was deleted from wikipedia and now shepherd's chapel is deleted from google.65.87.184.50 (talk) 12:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)