User talk:Meodipt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Great edits on MDPV, I am glad to see someone with formal education editing these articles. I try to clean them up but my organic chemistry is still fairly sketchy. 3 more years of formal education for my BSc to go.

first, the boiler-plate welcome:

Welcome!

Hello, Meodipt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

i'd also like to extend an invitation to the WikiProject on Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants. Which isn't invitation only or anything, i just thought that you might be interested in checking it out.

welcome again, hope you enjoy editing here!

Contents

[edit] Hi,

I see you created an article on azaperone; do you know perhaps, of what neuroleptic potency (i.e., what chlorpomazine equivalency) it is? I would tend to presume it to be rather a highly potent (>10?) neuroleptic/antipsychotic, since it's a butyrophenone, but couldn't find any data on this. Thank you.--Spiperon 06:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Drugs from TiHKAL template

Good work with that template and the articles you made from TiHKAL. Also sorry it took me so long to respond... these days i can rarely get to a computer. Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 22:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving articles

I just wanted to let you know that it's better to use the move function, rather than cutting and pasting an article to a new title (see Help:Moving a page). This keeps the article history together. I think I have put things for CFT the way that they should be - I ended up moving the article twice because I didn't get it right the first time. Can you please double check me? Thanks for all your contributions. --Ed (Edgar181) 11:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi there

Just a quick note of thanks for your recent edits. Keep up the good work, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] J (psychedelic)

Thanks again on your work clarifying the sources for J after my last edit. Alvis 10:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ohmefentanyl pharmacology namespace

A while back you made the ohmefentanyl page much more encyclopedic - my props on cleaning it up! However, you replaced one section with a link to nuklear's userpage on ohmefentanyl. I am concerned about whether encyclopedic content really belongs in the user namespace (see Wikipedia:User_page#Copies_of_other_pages), especially since the casual browser is not informed of the crossover between regulated and (mostly) unregulated content. I think a section on ohmefentanyl pharmacology within the article itself would be a much better solution than linking to nuklear's page - especially since his doesn't currently have anything to do with the mess you were cleaning up. I'll work on it (although I'm totally unfamiliar with the relevant literature and pretty busy at the moment), but I would really appreciate your help if you've got the time and are so inclined. Thanks! St3vo 17:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] (Nor)pethidine page(s)

Thanks for finally making one. I cleaned up the pethidine page a while ago and intended to start a norpethidine page at some point whenever I got the time. In the process, I did manage to upload an image of the metabolic pathways of pethidine in man (available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Metabolism_of_pethidine.png; I can't figure out how to link to an image page instead of an image itself, forigve the inconvenience) before getting sidetracked with other business. You may find it useful. I've seen you've also cleaned up a lot of other accreted pharmacological gunk that collects on wikipedia as well. It's good to see another honest-to-god pharmacologist/medicinal chemist/practitioner of one of the allied specialties in the biological sciences.

And, re: pethidine — know how to get that confusing tag off the top? I'd do it myself but it seems kind of unseemly since I wrote what most of confused someone enough to get that tag up there. If you could give it a once-over for clarity (and maybe delete the "confusing" bit if it doesn't violate some arcane wikipedian dictate), it'd be appreciated. Porkchopmcmoose 09:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invention dates

Please don't just search for the first instance of a drugs generic name in a scientific database and report that as it's invention date. Often you will not find the original article as it hasn't been named yet (obviously). KarlHallon 20:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] (Belated) Happy New Year! spam

Here's hoping the new year brings you nothing but the best ;) Fvasconcellos* (t·c) 15:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The design of this almost completely impersonal (yet hopefully uplifting) message was ripped from Riana (talk · contribs).
Please feel free to archive it whenever you like.


[edit] 4-Methylmethcathinone

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article 4-Methylmethcathinone, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Aminoalkylindoles

Fantastic! I only just stumbled upon the aminoalkylindoles last week and hadn't had a chance to fully digest the Aung 2000 paper yet. These novel cannabinoids are quite intriguing. I'll try to add some more info if I get a chance this week. Thanks! St3vo (talk) 19:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nice work on new articles!

Hey MeODiPT I'm just dropping by to thank you for the new psychedelic articles (Purdue/Dr. Nichols et al.) you've created. Keep up the good work!--Astavats (talk) 01:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nabitan

Your knowledge of obscure cannabinoids and opioids is fantastic. You are quite right re: unwritten cannabinoid articles, I was mostly just curious about what happened to the drug after stumbling upon the Archer, 1978 paper. Turns out I already had Nabitan watched... I was planning on expanding Naloxazone and starting Naloxonazine and O-1624 next but things have been very busy here. Keep up your excellent work! St3vo (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Taranabant

Bah! I don't know how that happened, it's pretty obvious, too...thanks for the catch. In any case, taranabant is interesting indeed - Merck seems to have first mentioned it last April, and they're already finishing Phase III trials - it doesn't even have a Pubchem entry yet. Don't see it getting approved, though, it's got more or less the same nasty anxiety/depression side effects as rimonabant from what I read...I think CB1's just too widely distributed and multi-purposed to just indiscriminately inactivate, but maybe a neutral antagonist would prove more promising than inverse agonists like the 'bants? I guess we'll see. St3vo (talk) 05:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

St3vo, this drug is still under clinical trials. Carlo Banez (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Clevudine

Hello. Why did you not create a chemical structure yet for clevudine? :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Because it took me a minute to draw one...look now! Meodipt (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Good job. :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 12:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Epiboxidine

Hi,

Please don't just remove tags without reason; I didn't just put them there for fun. It *does* need a cleanup.

Feel free to discuss it on my talk page if you like, and if there's anything I could do to help.

--  Chzz  ►  09:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey there. I've made some changes (hopefully improvements) to the article. I replaced the drugbox with {{Chembox new}}, because I really don't think drugboxes should be in articles on compounds not actually used as medications (whether in humans or animals). I see Chzz was particularly bothered by the question marks in the drugbox, so I hope this is a good solution all around :) Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for your efforts. Personally, I think it looks much better now. --  Chzz  ►  00:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] HDMP-28

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of HDMP-28, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/307/1/356. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)