Talk:Men with Brooms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Sports icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Important Stuff

As long as we are making words like "town" and "coach" linked, I suggest we also make the following words linked just for people who might be reading this from, say, a 2nd grade classroom:

- successful

- English

- film

- sport

- skip (seriously!)

- offbeat

- struggle

- cameo appearance

- outdoor scenes

- accurate

- liberties

- novelization

At that point, we could just as well make all the words linked, and why not? Wikipedia is here to educate! (I myself did not know what a "town" was until I found this article!)


I edited the page to remove the unneccessary links for 'town' and 'coach' (as the anonymous person above suggested) and removed the following text from the first paragraph:

[The movie is] among the most successful English Canadian films on a Canadian subject ever.

This is too trivial in my opinion. The list of "succesful English Canadian films on a Canadian subject" is probably very short (if anyone keeps such a list, which I doubt, please enlighten us) so this movie being among them does not say much. With statements this specific, everything is the most something. This aside, the definition of "success" is unclear and probably arbitrary.

It is also the most successful curling movie, and the only major feature film which centres around the sport.

Again, this doesn't say much unless there are notable curling movies to compare to, which there aren't. The fact that it is the first move on this subject is mentioned later (if people feel this is important enough to put in the first paragraph, feel free to put it back in.)

130.89.167.52 23:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MenWithBroomsposter.jpg

Image:MenWithBroomsposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)