Talk:Melissa Joan Hart/Archive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The discussion below was moved from Talk:Melissa Joan Hart by dcljr (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is dominated by a click
- Wikipedia is becoming dominated by a click
The three revert rule is NOT being violated, because friends at my school are helping me. It is 3 per person, not 3 per listing.
- It's "clique", not "click", and if you can't get any actual Wikipedians to agree with you about the merit of the link, perhaps you should be taking a lesson from that. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:51, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
-
- This is what I mean. We are all SUPPOSED to be equal on WIkipedia. Anyone can be a WIkipedians. You need to have respect for others
-
-
- Don't shift the issue from you to me. If you truly believed in that principle, you would start by honoring it yourself. You would say, "Gee, at least three Wikipedians who have substantial experience (including two who actually had to pass a vote indicating that the community thinks they have enough experience and have shown trustworthiness) are all opposed to my inclusion of this link. Maybe I should stop trying so hard to get my way on this and look at their view again with respect, to see why they think it's inappropriate to link this article. Instead of shifting into personal attacks against the people who are opposing me and recruiting my friends from offline to enforce the way I think things should be!" Yes, anyone can be a Wikipedian. That does not mean that everyone is just for showing up, particularly not those recruited just to get around the three-revert rule. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:25, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
-
Admin de facto control what is on WIkipeidia
A small group of admins de facto control what people can cany and read on WIkipedia. They are like the pigs in "Animal Farm" that took over. They say people cannot use other people to revert, yet they contact other admins to revert all the time. They often gang up in groups of three.
Yep, that sounds familiar. Ollieplatt 17:36, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. The old familiar "conspiracy" gambit. "Everyone is disagreeing with me! I must be right, and yet I can't find anyone to agree that I'm right and they're all saying that I'm wrong! Could... could I possibly be mistaken? No! It must be that they're in a conspiracy against me!" -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:01, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
The admins and the little people
The admins are no different than the 8th graders in our school that push us around just because we are 6th graders. They control Wikipedia by only allowing what they permit to be said or read.
- Just like your school, Wikipedia has rules. One of them is to sign your contributions to talk pages. Please get a username and sign your comments. Thanks -Willmcw 20:10, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
-
- You're making up the "rules" as you go along, dude. What's wrong? Afraid that you'll be wrong if you don't have a rule that says you're right?
- Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages -Willmcw 00:05, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- You're making up the "rules" as you go along, dude. What's wrong? Afraid that you'll be wrong if you don't have a rule that says you're right?
- I'm sure you'd like to believe that, just as you'd like to believe that your English teacher gives you bad marks on your research papers just because she doesn't like you. Unfortunately, it has far more to do with your unwillingness or inability to stick to facts, and not mingle them with personal opinions and conclusions you've jumped to.
- And there really isn't a need to create a brand-new page section every time you make another complaint. Especially not when it's the same complaint over and over. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:00, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
