Talk:Megyn Kelly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Affair Rumors

Vandalism of Ms. Kelly's previous Wikipedia entry? [1] SUBWAYguy 19:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, they are untrue, but they have being widely reported on a variety of websites relating to the cable news industry, and an explanation of how the rumor began is justified being on this page. And the fact that the starter of the rumor began the rumor by vandalizing this very page is an interesting fact that gives it more credit that it should belong her. The article is already a stub, and needs to be expanded. --IvanKnight69 12:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The untrue Hume rumor is just unadulterated TRASH not worthy of further debate or publication, does nothing to expand the biography of Ms. Kelly. No real media has reported it, just trashy internet gossip blogs. If it was true then it would be notable and article worthy, but is not true and is thus unfounded gossip trash. -- CommunistBloc 14:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rape Controversy

The O'Reilly Factor rape comment violates undue weight, as well as WP:BLP guidelines. It was poorly sourced, and not a controversy of Megyn Kelly. Arzel 12:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

oh contraire mon frére, it is properly sourced, i.e. it was brodcast on the most popular US news network. Second, I doubt anybody would regard the comments as anything but controversial and insensitive. It is a matter of record and must stay. --86.42.34.95 (talk) 09:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)